Showing 3 results for Amiri Ghale Rashidi
Niloufar Amiri Ghale Rashidi, Dr Alireza Namazi Shabestari, Alireza Arab Yarmohammadi, Maryam Mazinani, Sepideh Masoud Sinaki,
Volume 18, Issue 3 (10-2019)
Abstract
Background & Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the current organizational culture in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, which is to be considered in order to strengthen organizational culture.
Material & Method: The present study is a descriptive cross-sectional study and an applied research-based survey that was conducted in Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2019. The sample size was calculated and analyzed using Cochran's formula for 306 people. In this study, Denison's Organizational Culture Questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, descriptive statistical methods, one-sample mean and Pearson Correlation Tests.
Results: The average of organizational culture in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, in each component, culture of Involvement (2.29), culture of consistency (2.63), culture of adaptability (2.66) and culture of mission (2.58), Which represented a higher-than-average culture in all aspects of Denison's view.
Conclusion: The organization should do some corrective actions with respect to the components of adaptability (subculture of organizational learning) and Involvement (Capability Development), which has earned a lower score.
Hossein Alaie, Niloufar Amiri Ghale Rashidi, Mojtaba Amiri,
Volume 19, Issue 3 (11-2020)
Abstract
Background: The Family Physician Program, one of the most important efforts of the Iran health system to establish a referral system, was developed and implemented in several provinces, but it faced challenges due to several reasons that prevented the program's progress. So This study was conducted to analyze the family physician program to identify the causes and challenges of the program failure.
Materials & Methods: This retrospective study of policy analysis is a qualitative study with Purposive sampling. Semi-open interviews and document analysis were used for data collection. Data analysis was performed through thematic analysis in the policy triangle framework using MAXQDA software.
Results: According to the study framework, the challenges of the Family Physician Program in the context are conflict of interest, dependency of plans to oneself, instability in management and plans, insufficient attention to culture, resources, and infrastructure. In terms of content include disproportionate executive approach, Lack of localization, selection of inappropriate tools, insufficient transparency, and ambiguity in goals, tasks, and responsibilities; The challenges of the process were examined based on the policy cycle.
Conclusion: The implementation of the family physician program is influenced by cultural, social, political, managerial, and economic factors. As the Ministry of Health officials has re-introduced this crucial program, reviewing the content and methods of program implementation seems necessary.
Niloufar Amiri Ghale Rashidi, Farin Razaghi Kashani, Ramin Rahimnia, Ebrahim Jaafari Pooyan, Alireza Arab Yarmohammadi, Hadi Mokhtare, Masoud Rafati, Zohreh Jabari Moghadam,
Volume 23, Issue 4 (2-2025)
Abstract
Background and purpose: In Iran’s health system, the lack of a systematic process for selecting managers based on the specific competencies required in medical universities and the health sector has long been a challenge. To address this gap, Tehran University of Medical Sciences took the lead as the first institution to design a competency mapping framework for frontline and middle managers, aiming to align managerial selection with the strategic goals of the health system.
Methods: Firstly, a succession planning committee was formed in the university’s Vice-Chancellor for Management Development and Resource Planning. Following an extensive review of relevant models and strategies by several expert panels, this committee proposed guidelines for selecting selecting managers based on merit and developed a competency mapping process.
Results: The competency mapping process was structured into eight steps, including: candidate eligibility screening, assessment of general and technical competencies, 360-degree performance evaluation, review of prior experience, and participation in a mentoring-based empowerment program.
Conclusion: Using this merit-based selection model, top-performing candidates could be successfully appointed to managerial roles. A key achievement of this process is fostering a culture of meritocracy and advancing the organizational maturity of the university. Competency and talent mapping can serve as a robust framework for succession planning and managerial development in medical universities and the broader health system. This approach might significantly contribute to optimizing the selection and development of future leaders for critical positions via identifying skill gaps, assessing development needs, evaluating performance, and enhancing talent identification.