Ali Ardalan, Arezu Najafi, Anita Sabzghabaie, Vahid Zonoobi, Saeed Ardalan, Hamidreza Khankeh, Gholamreza Masoumi , Mohsen Abbasi, Amir Nejati, Mehdi Zahabi,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (7 2011)
Abstract
Background: vulnerable events could damage structural, non structural and functional components of hospitals that might lead to community crisis, accordingly. Risk assessment is the first step to develop of a hospital disaster plan. In this study, a primary phase of developing a local tool for Iran's hospital disaster risk assessment entitled "Hospital Safety Index (HSI)" was conducted by World Health Organization originally.
Materials and Methods: First, the original index was translated into Farsi in five forms and 145 items. Then a group of four experts from the fields of medicine and engineering assessed the items one-by-one for their relevance and applicability. Revised edition tested three times at Shariati hospital in Tehran. An expert panel also evaluated the feature and content validity of the index. They also weighted the items as well.
Results: Test-retest of the index by two independent research groups found 93% of agreement. Furthermore, 244 points were revised or added to the original edition. The most important changes included: Combining instruction parts with related items for increasing educational properties, completing the list of hazards, developing a plan to analysis, and to present a quantitative and graphic of the model and finally to prepare an educational package as well.
Conclusion: Persian version of HSI, in response to needs of Iranian's health system, represents a rapid no-expensive tool for screening disaster risks at hospitals based on an international template that was tested in several countries. Based on this study, the Farsi index would be evaluated in more hospitals around the country. The assessment results will provide Iranian's health system with evidence-based information for more effective allocated resources and interventions evaluating.
Neda Vaziri, Ali Ardalan, Elham Ahmadnezhad, Abbas Rahimi Foroshan,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (6-2015)
Abstract
Background: Emergency operation centers (EOC) have been established in recent years aimed to organize and coordinate through disasters. These centers are responsible for decision-making in response and recovery phases after events. This study is aimed to develop a standard function evaluation criteria for EOC.
Materials and Methods: This mixed method study with sequential triangulation approach had been conducted in 1391 among employees of EOCs which have been running experience for minimum of one year . validity and reliability of questionnaire had been confirmed by face and content validity and Cronbach's alpha respectively. The most important factors have been determined by an Explanatory factor analysis which also helped reducing number of questions.
Results: Final tool by six domains had 38 questions. All content validities were higher than +0.6 apart from one at +0.1. Only the activation domain had inappropriate Cronbach at 0.337 and all others were higher than 0.7. Factor analysis reduced number of questions in each domain. Explanatory factor analysis reduced number of questions from the views of information assessment, activation and coordination and other domains to 5 ,2 and 1 respectively.
Conclusion:It seems that mentioned questionnaire could be an appropriate criteria for assessing performance of EOCs due to its validity and reliability according . The high reliability was resulted from closed correlation of. Appropriate quantity of validity implied EOC personnel great depth of knowledge on all questions asked.
