Showing 2 results for Fazaeli
Arash Mofarahzat, Ali Akbar Fazaeli, Yadollah Hamidi,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (4-2020)
Abstract
Background and Objective: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease and is the leading cause of death from single-agent infectious diseases. The purpose of this study was to estimate the economic costs of this disease and its effective factors in Hamadan province.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on a cross-sectional (two-year time scale) study in 2014 and 2015. The population of this study is tuberculosis patients in Hamadan province. Data extraction was performed by examining the file of patients with tuberculosis in urban and rural health centers and patients of hospital in Hamadan. Also, using a logistic model and Stata 15, social factors and households that are more likely to be exposed to this disease were studied.
Results: A total of 173 tuberculosis patients were identified, with an estimated cost of treatment of 8307 million IRR. Also, the results of the Logit model showed that people living in the city over 65, low educated, and people with HIV The order of 22, 14, 18, and 6 percent would be greater than the likelihood of exposure to tuberculosis.
Conclusion: The cost of tuberculosis, in addition to allocating a significant amount of health resources in the province, also imposes a high burden on households. The social and economic consequences of these costs lead to many abnormalities such as the exclusion of women with a family or the abandonment of the children of affected people.
Yusef Eivazi, Yadollah Hamidi, Ali Akbar Fazaeli,
Volume 20, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Abstract
Introduction: Inappropriate admission and inappropriate hospital days are two undesirable indicators in terms of controlling hospital costs. This study was conducted to determine the rate of inappropriate admission and hospital days and related factors in Shohada Hospital in Kermanshah.
Methods: This is descriptive-analytical study.The statistical population included patients admitted of Kermanshah shohada Hospital in 1397. 245 Inpatient records were selected using Cochran's formula and stratified random sampling. Appropriateness evaluation protocol was used to evaluate the inappropriate admission and inappropriate hospital days. The relationship between age, sex, type of admission, type of ward, type of treatment, coverage of cost hospitalization, place of residence, with rate of inappropriate admissions and inappropriate hospital days was assessed using spss16 software.
Results: 5.7% of admissions and 21.4% of hospital days were inappropriate. Inadequate admission was significantly related to gender, type of surgical or medical treatment, type of hospital ward in chi-square test in contingency tables with 95% confidence. Inappropriate hospital days were related to the type of hospitalization ward in kruskal-Wallis test , type of treatment and place of residence in Mann-Whitney test.
Conclusion: By determining the amount of inappropriate admissions and inappropriate hospital days and related factors for policy makers and managers of hospitals and insurance organizations, it is possible to avoid unnecessary costs without reducing the quality of hospital services.