Showing 4 results for Jaafari Pooyan
F Akbari Haghighi, E Jaafari Pooyan,
Volume 8, Issue 3 (7 2010)
Abstract
Background: Various studies have highlighted the importance of accreditation as a ubiquitous performance measurement system of hospitals. However, the effectiveness of this mechanism has not been addressed, as much it deserves, in developing countries. Therefore, current study intends to investigate the performance of the system using the SERVQUAL model.
Material and Methods: This research is an applied and cross-sectional survey. Decision-making Board of Hamedan Hospitals (N= 200) constitutes the target group. A self-administered questionnaire including both structured and open-ended questions has been used for data collection. Analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data was conducted using SPSS and Thematic Content Analysis (TCA), respectively.
Results: Only 39 percent of the target group had high awareness of current accreditation programme.
The highest rate of gap, 55.8%, between the group's perceptions and expectations from accreditation system, belonged to the indicator of staff's satisfaction and the lowest rate, 17.3%, to structures and establishments.
Conclusion: The low score of the target group's perceptions towards the accreditation programme could be a sign of the low degree of their satisfaction, which might result in their poor cooperation. More and effective attention to hospital managers' views, recommendations and reactions might be an appropriate preventive solution.
Ebrahim Jaafari Pooyan, Hojjat Rahmani, Mohammadamin Mirshekari,
Volume 19, Issue 4 (12-2020)
Abstract
Introduction: Identifying the challenges of Quality Improvement Offices (QIOs) not only helps in planning the quality of hospital services and in trying to provide a suitable solution to solve the problems of these offices but also plays an important role in strengthening the offices and increasing the quality of clinical and non-clinical services of hospitals. This study aimed to investigate the challenges of quality improvement offices in hospitals and provide appropriate solutions.
Methods: The present qualitative research was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 40 managers and hospital boards, matrons, quality improvement experts of hospitals and accreditation offices experts of medical universities in Tehran. Content analysis method was used to analyze the data obtained from the interviews. Then, the collected data were analyzed and classified by MAXQDA10 software.
Results: By analyzing the interviews in the field of challenges and solutions, the extracted codes were classified into four areas of management, standards, evaluation and staff. The most codes were related to management with 5 themes and 21 sub-themes. In addition, most of the solutions were related to the field of management.
Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that most of the challenges and solutions were in the field of management. Focusing on this field could be helpful in improving the quality of offices performance.
Ebrahim Jaafari Pooyan, Riaz Alaei Kalajahi, Farhad Habibi, Shiva Toloui Rakhshan,
Volume 20, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Abstract
Niloufar Amiri Ghale Rashidi, Farin Razaghi Kashani, Ramin Rahimnia, Ebrahim Jaafari Pooyan, Alireza Arab Yarmohammadi, Hadi Mokhtare, Masoud Rafati, Zohreh Jabari Moghadam,
Volume 23, Issue 4 (2-2025)
Abstract
Background and purpose: In Iran’s health system, the lack of a systematic process for selecting managers based on the specific competencies required in medical universities and the health sector has long been a challenge. To address this gap, Tehran University of Medical Sciences took the lead as the first institution to design a competency mapping framework for frontline and middle managers, aiming to align managerial selection with the strategic goals of the health system.
Methods: Firstly, a succession planning committee was formed in the university’s Vice-Chancellor for Management Development and Resource Planning. Following an extensive review of relevant models and strategies by several expert panels, this committee proposed guidelines for selecting selecting managers based on merit and developed a competency mapping process.
Results: The competency mapping process was structured into eight steps, including: candidate eligibility screening, assessment of general and technical competencies, 360-degree performance evaluation, review of prior experience, and participation in a mentoring-based empowerment program.
Conclusion: Using this merit-based selection model, top-performing candidates could be successfully appointed to managerial roles. A key achievement of this process is fostering a culture of meritocracy and advancing the organizational maturity of the university. Competency and talent mapping can serve as a robust framework for succession planning and managerial development in medical universities and the broader health system. This approach might significantly contribute to optimizing the selection and development of future leaders for critical positions via identifying skill gaps, assessing development needs, evaluating performance, and enhancing talent identification.
