Showing 5 results for Jahangiri
Abbas Jahangiri, Mohammad Ali Keramati,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2014)
Abstract
Background : All managers want to improve their organization 's efficiency . The purpose of this paper In addition to the asses the efficiency of Hospital during the time, is trying to answer to this question that, is the recruitment of new personnel able to increase hospital efficiency?
Materials & Methods : In this sectional study, the relative efficiency of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Arak during the thirty-one months Since April 2011 to November 2013 (16 months before and 15 months after the recruitment) by input-oriented DEA method with five inputs and five outputs and with considering each month as a decision making unit, was calculated by DEAP 2.1 software. Then, the efficiency scores during the two stages, once for sixteen months, and once for a total of thirty one month separately by Mann - Kendall test via Minitab 16 software was analyzed and the most important event in the hospital during the study period, was asked from hospital authorities.
Results: Most inputs and outputs of hospital have increased. The efficiency of the last eight months was equal to one . In addition, the efficiency of eleventh month was lower. The value of zs for first sixteen months and for a total of thirty-one months -0.55769 and 2.05318, respectively calculated .
Conclusion: Trend analysis of the efficiency Scores showed that simultaneously with the recruitment of new personnel without reports of other influential factors, Hospital efficiency has significantly improved.
Abbas Jahangiri,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (8-2016)
Abstract
Background: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical model that evaluates the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple input and output. The purpose of this paper was systematic study of applying this technique in Iranian hospitals.
Materials and Methods: In this systematic review which was conducted in September 2015 and February2016, attempted to search the research which conducted in Iranian hospitals regardless of the time of publication using searching keywords in six scientific databases and with the help of Google search engine. A total of 6,613 researches found. Then, 6,566 researches removed from the study because of the irrelevant, repetitive and Inaccessibility to the full text. Then, attempted to statistical analysis of 47 remaining researches via Excel 2010 software.
Results: 93.6 percent of the researches were published in 2009 onwards. The most research and least research have been conducted in three and eleven provinces respectively. The diversity of output indexes have been more than diversity of input indexes. In 81 percent of researches; input oriented model was used and in 74.5 percent of researches variable returns to scale is assumed. In most studies, referred to Iran's inefficient hospitals because of existence of excess resources.
Conclusions: In last seven years, the interest of Iranian researchers has increased about DEA application in hospitals especially in Tehran, Yazd and Khoozestan provinces. Scientific and rational use of resources is a proposal to the relevant authorities.
Somayeh Nouri, Dr Leila Riahi, Dr Kamran Hajinabi, Dr Katayuon Jahangiri ,
Volume 16, Issue 4 (2-2018)
Abstract
Background: Priority setting and resource allocation are assumed to be the most important issues of health-sector and fairness thereof requires considering various criteria. This study was performed to identify the criteria used for priority setting and resource allocation in the world health systems through comprehensive review.
Materials and Methods: Cochrane, PubMed and SCOPUS database were searched systematically from Jan.1,2005 to Oct.10,2016. The English articles with codified and specified qualitative and quantitative criteria in the resource allocation context in health sector were included in the study. The obtained data were synthetized thematically.
Results: Overall, 9162 papers were extracted. At the beginning of review of the included articles, 9089 papers were removed due to duplication and also based on the title. The abstracts of the remained papers were reviewed and 17 papers were removed. Full text of 59 remained papers were reviewed and based on matching with the inclusion criteria, 34 other papers were removed, too, and ultimately 25 papers were included in the final phase of the study. Extracted criteria were categorized into four dimentions based on economic, management, structural and contextual, out of which the most frequent ones were related to cost, health system goals, local capacity and disease status, respectively.
Conclusion: In this study, the most important criteria used by policy makers and decision makers of health system in the world were extracted for priority setting and resource allocation. The results indicated that in the world, priority setting and resource allocation in the health system is made mainly based on criteria such as cost-effectiveness, disease status, equity/equality and the need.
Abbas Jahangiri, Mohammad Jahangiri,
Volume 18, Issue 2 (8-2019)
Abstract
Background: One of the most important ways to promote the quality and attractiveness of the journal for readers is the accurate evaluation of the published articles research methodology in the journals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the research methods of the articles published in the Journal of Hospital.
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive study, the research methods of all articles published in the Journal of Hospital from Fall 2016 to Fall 2018 including qualitative or quantitative, field or library research , data collection methods, data analysis software, location of research, nature of the research (descriptive or analytical, etc.), topics, as well as the number of authors were investigated.
Results: Data of 55.29% of papers was qualitative that was turned to quantitative, 47.06% of articles had descriptive-analytical method, and 68.24% of papers had employed a field research method. In addition, 51.76% of articles had used questionnaire and the SPSS software was used in 52.08% of the articles. The location of 45.45% of researches was in Tehran province. Finally, the subject of 23.53% of papers was policy making, planning, leadership, and management in hospitals.
Conclusion: Most authors of the articles have followed a very similar research method during the mentioned period. So, creating diversity in the nature of the researches, using other methods of collecting information rather than questionnaires, doing more library research, and not limiting the researches to Tehran province are the most important suggestions for future researchers.
Abbas Jahangiri, Dr Hojjat Rahmani, Shiva Tolouei Rakhshan,
Volume 18, Issue 2 (8-2019)
Abstract
Background: Iranian health system transformation plan has been implemented since 2014 with the aim of financial protection of people, equity establishment in access to health services and quality improvement of hospital services. Hospital performance evaluation is essential in order to monitor the health system transformation plan. One of the tools for evaluating hospital performance is the dynamic multi-attribute decision-making method. The purpose of this study was to use the dynamic multi-attribute decision-making method to evaluate the performance of the hospital before and after the implementation of the health system transformation plan.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of Shariati Hospital in Tehran was evaluated for 48 consecutive months (24 months before and 24 months after the Health System Transformation plan, 2012-2016). Each month was addressed as an option in the decision-making matrix and ,with considering six important health indicators, the hospital performance was dynamically assessed using the weighted aggregated sum product assessment and through EXCEL software 2010.
Results: Hospital performance scores had some fluctuations over time; however, in general, it had an increasing trend over forty-eight months. The highest and lowest values were for months 42 and 13 (0.4932 and 0.9408, respectively). In addition, in the first month of the solar year, the hospital performance score declined significantly for each year.
Conclusion: Changes in hospital performance scores during the study period show improvement in hospital performance. Nevertheless, this incremental process cannot be considered as a positive outcome of the health system transformation plan. Therefore, while improving the current process, continuing the hospital performance evaluation can lead to the hospital's performance promotion.
