Showing 7 results for Moradi
Reza Safdari, Hussein Dargahi, Leila Shahmoradi,
Volume 9, Issue 1 (9 2010)
Abstract
Introduction: Evaluations of a system of information, without analyzing its users understand is impossible. User satisfaction is as key factor of success information system. It is essential to consider information system context (user, task, equipment and environment), user type and user experience in quality ergonomic computerized information systems. Therefore in this study HIS quality ergonomic of Iran compared with other software.
Methods: A comparative study in 1389 was conducted. In order to compare the evaluation results of hospital information system with other software, applications were selected that already were evaluated using isometric questionnaire. These software are a) IS-H * med (software evaluated by Hamburg and colleagues in 2004), b) SAP-HR (software evaluated by Gruber 2000) and c) Microsoft word for Windows (software evaluated by Gediga and colleagues in 1999). Users view analyzed through descriptive statistical and one sample t-test. Data analyzed through SPSS and Excel.
Results: HIS than IS-H * med of is significantly more usable. HIS than SAP-HR in terms of the IsoMetric Scales such as "suitable for task," "suitable for learning", "Error tolerance" and "learning ability" is significantly more usable. HIS vs. Microsoft's word is significantly less usable.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that hospital information system in Iran than the other software studied is average level in terms of ergonomic software quality. It is recommended regarding user expectations when designing and developing of information systems.
Dr. Khodakaram Salimifard, Leyla Keshtkar, Mohammadsadegh Moradi,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2014)
Abstract
Background: Emergency department performance can be evaluated in quantitative and qualitative criteria. Some quantitative criteria are considered such as length of stay, patient waiting time, the percentage of patients that treat in a specific time and etc. In this paper the performance of emergency department was evaluated in terms of these criteria. Then four scenarios by using simulations was proposed.
Materials & Methods: patient flow was modeled by discrete event simulation (DES) and the simulation was done by Arena software. Data was gathered randomly and patient waiting time, length of stay and the percentage of patients by noticing 6-hour boarding limit for EDs were performance criteria.
Result: The result show 70% of patients were hospitalized in ED over 6 hours and it is an important bottleneck. The fourth scenario is that best of the scenarios, that improve in waiting times for hospital admission (85%), total waiting time before hospitalization (63%) and the percentage of the beds utilization (15%).
Conclusion: the findings of this paper show that the fourth scenario has greatest improve in the process. In this scenario, to reduce waiting times for patients admitted to the emergency department as well as to reduce the high percentage of occupied beds, 3 beds and 1 nurse were added.
Mohammad Khammarnia, Dr Ramin Ravangard, Mohadeseh Ghanbari Jahromi, Asra Moradi,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2014)
Abstract
Background: Nowadays, Medical error as a major challenge has been attention of health authorities and community. The main purpose of this study was survey of medical errors in Shiraz public hospitals.
Materials & Methods: This study was a survey which conducted as analytical in 2013. Study population was Shiraz public hospitals which 10 hospitals were examined. Standard checklist was used for collecting data of medical error documentations. Data entered in SPSS software version 21 and used of descriptive, spearman and chi-square test for data analysis.
Results: the number of medical errors in hospitals during the one year was 4379 recorded and the most of error was related to larger hospitals. Nurses committed wrong more than other groups and systemic error had the highest frequency. There was a significant relationship between trespassing, time and type of error, (P=0.000). Moreover, there was a significant relationship between type of error with wards and hospitals). P=0.000, P=0.011 respectively)
Conclusion: The number of errors occurring in hospitals is symptoms of poor performance, therefore to prevent and reduce the medical errors and costs, managers should pay more attention to hospital performance and treatment guidelines are revised. Moreover, the hospital staff, especially nurses should pay more attention to their activities.
Abdolvahed Khodamoradi, Arash Rashidian, Siamak Aghlmand, Mohmad Arab,
Volume 14, Issue 3 (9-2015)
Abstract
Background: Informal payments are paid to individuals /health care providing organizations offering as cash or non-cash and are formed out of formal payment channels. This study aim at identifying the types of informal payments, causes, effects and policies to deal with them.
Materials and Methods: This study was a review one and relative published articles identified by searching valid database ( Medlib, SID, Pub Med, Science Direct and Google Scholar)using keywords with their equal in Persian (informal payment and unofficial payment) and 128 articles were extracted. The articles refined step by step. In conclusion, 20 articles were selected according to study aims.
Results: The study findings consist of five main sections including the definition and form of informal payments, the existent causes of informal payments, effects of informal payments, statistics of informal payments in Iran and the world and policies to dealing with this important issue.
Conclusion: Due to the high prevalence of informal payments and severe negative effects on justice and respectable governance, policy-makers should focus on this issue and reduce its effects. Although, strategies to control informal payments are limited but strategies including regulation payment and medical tariffs, regulating power abuse, providing incentives and increasing responsibility of healthcare professionals, and changes in public perception are proposed.
Ali Moradi, Khaled Rahmani, Dr Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan, Rasoul Yarahmadi,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (5-2018)
Abstract
Introduction: Since incorrect selection of a manager might lead to incorrect choices of other members, organizations need to consider this important issue and use well-sought mechanisms for managers’ selection process. Accordingly, this study aims to rank the key factors associated with the selection of operational managers in Tehran University of Medical Sciences
.
Materials and Methods: This research employed a logical and systematic trend to develop and rank the indicators using fuzzy TOPSIS method. In order for prioritization of key indicators of qualification of operational-level; after reviewing the literature and using experts’ viewpoints , the dimensions of performance have been selected and using, the SMART technique the key criteria were weighted. A validated and reliable questionnaire was used for data collection
.
Results: Fifty individuals participated in this study. 37 (74%) and 13 (26%) were male and female respectively. The mean and standard deviation of age of participants were 41.68 and 7.06 years. Literature reviews and related studies indicated 48 indices for choosing qualified managers. Among these, according to the expert’s opinion in management science and managers, 36 indices were selected as key indicators. Based on the FTOPSIS analysis, indicators of higher education in the field of management, compliance time, power of expression, adornment and belief in law and order achieved coefficients as 0.205, 0.204, 0.203, 0.202 and 0.197, rank first to fifth
.
Conclusion: According to the results management related education and expertise in technical aspects of organizational management control were at the top of ranking . Results of this study can help medical universities and health service organizations to develop guidelines for selecting their managers
.
Ali Ebraze, Fahimeh Rabbanikhah, Amir Kazemi-Bolboloy, Reza Moradi, Amin Aghili,
Volume 18, Issue 1 (5-2019)
Abstract
Background: Organizational culture is one of the important predictor of organizational effectiveness, and a key factor success of the organization as a competitive advantage. Todays, a continuous assessment of organizational culture status is considered essential; therefore, this study aimed to identify and measure organizational culture of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on the headquarters of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2018. The study population consisted of all employees of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (N=2200), 327 personals were selected through Cochran formula and stratified sampling method. The data collection instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity and reliability were confirmed (Cronbach's alpha =86.5%). In order to data analysis SPSS24 using descriptive and inferential statistics tests were utilized.
Results: The mean score of total organizational culture was 3.30 ± 0.70 from 5 which was higher than the theoretical average. Also, there was also a significant difference in partnership dimension in terms of employment type and in participation dimensions, accountability to the upstream institutions as well as total organizational culture score in terms of deputy. There was a direct statistical association between dimensions of organizational culture.
Conclusion: According to study results, strong organizational culture will lead to improved performance in the organization and alignment of individuals and activities. Given the importance of specific role of culture in each organization, plans success and change strategies, human resources managers should take appropriate actions to improve internal and external communication and increase teamwork and accountability.
Seyed Rahim Safavi Mirmahalleh, Mohammad Rahim Ramazanian, Mahmoud Moradi, Mostafa Ebrahimpour Azbari,
Volume 22, Issue 4 (1-2024)
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Health status is undeniably one of the most critical indicators of social development and progress. Providing healthcare poses a significant challenge for human life, and managing the healthcare supply chain is of strategic importance. The aim of this research is to analyze and compare the results of meta-synthesis with thematic analysis in identifying the risks of the pharmaceutical industry's supply chain.
Methods: This research follows a qualitative approach, utilizing both meta-synthesis and thematic analysis to identify supply chain risks in the pharmaceutical industry. In the first step, a meta-synthesis and systematic review of related studies over the past twenty-three years were conducted, identifying one hundred articles, which were refined to twenty-six key articles for the research. In the next step, risks specific to Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain were identified through thematic analysis and semi-structured interviews with experts, using targeted sampling. Finally, the results from these two approaches were compared and analyzed.
Results: The meta-synthesis approach identified ten general supply chain risks in the global pharmaceutical industry. Similarly, the thematic analysis approach identified ten specific supply chain risks in Iran's pharmaceutical industry. Six risks were common to both approaches: low quality of raw materials, complexity and incompatibility of information systems, supply of foreign currency and financial payments, transportation and insurance issues, increase in the price of raw materials, and unavailability of medicines. These common risks are critical for both the global and Iranian pharmaceutical supply chains.
Conclusion: Stakeholders in Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain (including hospitals) should prioritize managing these six common risks to improve supply chain performance. Additionally, they should focus on the four unique risks identified through thematic analysis specific to Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain, applying appropriate control measures and activities.
