Journal of

---

Background: In the hospital setting, the potential for conflict is considerably high, because of the frequent and complicated interactions among nurses, physicians and other medical team staff and also the variety of their roles. With regards to the destructive conflict between physician and nurse which can negatively impact on the quality of health care delivery, this study aimed to investigate sources of conflict between physicians and nurses. Materials & Methods: The study population involved a total of physicians and nursing cadre employed in 4 hospitals affiliated to Ardebil University of Medical Sciences. 260 subjects were selected by both census and Simple random sampling methods. Data collection process was accomplished through questionnaire that its reliability and validity were confirmed. Data analysis was done using the Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Inequality in the social status between physicians and nurses from the perspective of patients and their attendants and also inequality in distribution of immaterial benefits between two forementioned groups (mean=3.23) were the most leading factors in arising conflict. The Social economic system (p<0.001), the health system (p=0.013), the hospital system (p<0.001) and interpersonal relations (p<0.001) variables had a significant relationship with the organizational position. Conclusion: creating appropriate social and cultural contexts in order to promote the social status of nursing profession as well as improving the organization and its management could be effective to prevent or at least mitigate conflict between physicians and nurses.

---

Abstract: Background: According to reports, the nurses frequently and directly are faced with the deaths, suffering and pain, thus a major mechanism for administrators is empowering of staff. With this approach, the object of study was examining the role of ethical leadership at promote nurses' psychological empowerment. Material and Methods: Considering the purpose of this study, it was applied & considering the data collection methods, it was descriptive –analytical. Statistical population was nurses in working in Sanandaj public hospitals (410 people) and 148 subjects were selected using random sampling. Data gathering tools were two questionnaires: Ethical Leadership (Salehnia: 2012) and psychological empowerment Questionnaire (Wooten & Cameron, 1998). Data analysis was performed by SPSS (Version 16) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Pearson correlation test and Multiple Regression (Method: Enter). Results: Results showed that the items of questionnaires can be reduced to the fundamental dimensions. Results also showed that there was a significant relationship between ethical leadership and psychological empowerment. Finally, it was found that components of Pattern and Pragmatism are predictive of psychological empowerment. Conclusion: According to study findings, hospital Administrators can by display appropriate ethical behaviors and efforts to strengthen interpersonal relationships and encourage such behaviors among members provide Contexts improving nurses' Psychological Empowerment

---

Background: Nurses are the largest group of health care providers and emergency department is known as a high risk ward in terms of occupational injuries. The aim of current study is to make out nursing occupational hazards in the emergency department among teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Materials and Methods: The study carried outed on 250 emergency department’s nursing staff of hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. A valid and reliable questionnare used for data gathering by Simple random sampling method. Data analysed using descriptive snd inferential statistics.

Results: The level of mean and SD of occupational injuries (2.87 ± 0.55) was assessed moderate. Among occupational hazzards, Psychosocial and institutional (3.58 ± 0.47) and Ergonomic (3.57 ± 0.71) ones were the most prevalent occupational hazards respectively and chemical hazards were the least important source of occupational injury. There was a statistical significant association of occupational injuries and variables such as hospital, years in practice, educational level, type of employment and training courses in occupational hazards (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Nurses exposes a range of risk factors in different domains regarding occupational injuries. With the purpose of eliminating the risk factors, it needs to run various strategies in different domains. Applying ergonomic approaches, developing appropriate educational programs, providing adequate training in this area, etc., can result in reduceing occupational injuries and increasing their productivity.

---

Background: Administrative violations are a person-centered behavior that violates the accepted organizational norms, and thus, can threaten the organization health. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the causes of prolonging the time of taken to deal with administrative violations were at the staff of Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
 
Materials and Methods: This study was a qualitative content analysis one. For sampling, convenience, purposeful and snowball sampling methods were used. The sample size continued to saturate the interview data with each group of people. Data collection was performed with open questions and interviews using semi-structured interviews. Finally, all interviews were analyzed using MAXQDA software.
 
Results: After implementing and data analysis, the causes for prolonging the time spent on administrative violations in primary and recruiting boards were divided into five main categories including "member characteristics"; "actual proceedings"; "Inevitable factors"; " legal factors "and" organizational factors".
 
Conclusion: According to the findings and experts’ opinions, the most problems in the process of handling administrative violations are related to the time lag in the notification process, investigation and expertise. Membership training, teamwork, and the use of members with different expertise can prevent employees from handling administrative offenses.
 

---

Background and Aim: Conflict between health workers is an important problem in health care units around the world. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups in the hospital.
 
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2018. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire was designed in two parts: demographic variables and causes of conflict between nursing and other occupational groups with a Likert scale of 5 points. 120 nursing staff of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences randomly selected were surveyed. Data were analyzed by SPSS software15 using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
 
Results: The highest rate of conflict reported by nurses was related to the conflict with the group of managers (4.17±0.94) and the lowest rate was with administrative, financial and support staff (3.55±1.13). The most important reasons for conflict between nursing staff and different groups were: imposing non-specialist roles (such as completing doctors' documentation); perceived inequality in workload distribution; insufficient understanding of nursing work conditions; unreasonable differences in salaries and other benefits, and unfair distribution of manpower. There was also a statistically significant correlation between the level of conflict with marital status, work experience, age group (p <0.05).
 
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the role of some factors causing conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups. These findings could be a practical guide for hospital managers in making practical decisions and strategies for managing workplace conflicts.