Showing 3 results for Panahi Tosanloo
Dr Farhad Habibi Nodeh, Abolfazl Roozbeh, Serajedin Grey, Ghasem Rajabi Vasokolaee , Mohammad Panahi Tosanloo , Bahman Khosravi,
Volume 17, Issue 3 (11-2018)
Abstract
Background: Administrative violations are a person-centered behavior that violates the accepted organizational norms, and thus, can threaten the organization health. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the causes of prolonging the time of taken to deal with administrative violations were at the staff of Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Materials and Methods: This study was a qualitative content analysis one. For sampling, convenience, purposeful and snowball sampling methods were used. The sample size continued to saturate the interview data with each group of people. Data collection was performed with open questions and interviews using semi-structured interviews. Finally, all interviews were analyzed using MAXQDA software.
Results: After implementing and data analysis, the causes for prolonging the time spent on administrative violations in primary and recruiting boards were divided into five main categories including "member characteristics"; "actual proceedings"; "Inevitable factors"; " legal factors "and" organizational factors".
Conclusion: According to the findings and experts’ opinions, the most problems in the process of handling administrative violations are related to the time lag in the notification process, investigation and expertise. Membership training, teamwork, and the use of members with different expertise can prevent employees from handling administrative offenses.
Ziba Khalili, Mohammad Panahi Tosanloo, Bahman Khosravi, Naser Iravanimanesh, Rezvan Kazemi Dastjerdeei, Loghman Azmoudeh, Ramin Ahmadzadeh, Abolghasem Pourreza,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (4-2020)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Conflict between health workers is an important problem in health care units around the world. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups in the hospital.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2018. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire was designed in two parts: demographic variables and causes of conflict between nursing and other occupational groups with a Likert scale of 5 points. 120 nursing staff of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences randomly selected were surveyed. Data were analyzed by SPSS software15 using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
Results: The highest rate of conflict reported by nurses was related to the conflict with the group of managers (4.17±0.94) and the lowest rate was with administrative, financial and support staff (3.55±1.13). The most important reasons for conflict between nursing staff and different groups were: imposing non-specialist roles (such as completing doctors' documentation); perceived inequality in workload distribution; insufficient understanding of nursing work conditions; unreasonable differences in salaries and other benefits, and unfair distribution of manpower. There was also a statistically significant correlation between the level of conflict with marital status, work experience, age group (p <0.05).
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the role of some factors causing conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups. These findings could be a practical guide for hospital managers in making practical decisions and strategies for managing workplace conflicts.
Yousef Hamidzadeh Arbabi, Mohammad Panahi Tosanloo, Rohqayeh Farrokhi, Amin Ahmadi,
Volume 24, Issue 2 (9-2025)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Workplace Violence (WPV) is a significant occupational hazard and is increasingly recognized as a critical crisis within the healthcare sector. Due to the inherent nature of their services, healthcare organizations are more susceptible to this phenomenon than other sectors. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of workplace violence and its role in predicting the job satisfaction of healthcare workers in Ardabil.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024. A total of 300 employees working under the auspices of the Ardabil Health Center were selected using stratified random sampling. Data collection utilized two standardized instruments: the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) and the Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 20) via descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression analysis.
Results: The overall job satisfaction rate was calculated at 58.75%. In terms of prevalence, 63.8% of the participants reported experiencing workplace violence at least once during the past year. The mean score of experienced violence was 27.35%. Psychological violence was the most frequent form (51.5%), while physical violence was the least frequent (9.4%). Significant statistical relationships were observed between demographic characteristics, workplace violence, and job satisfaction (P<0.05). Linear regression analysis identified workplace violence (β = 0.181) as the third most influential predictor of job satisfaction, following the payment system (β = 0.482) and advancement opportunities (β = 0.312).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that healthcare workers may have normalized workplace violence as an inherent part of their professional environment. Consequently, their job satisfaction appears to be more heavily influenced by economic factors—specifically the compensation and payment system—than by the adverse effects of occupational violence.
