Journal of

Background:  hospital is one of the most key institutions in the modern health care system and accountability is the most essential organizational functions. Accountability strengthens the main factors to responsibility regarding functions by pushing them up. This study aimed at assessing the situation analysis of  performance accountability in teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Materials and Methods: This descriptive and analytical study performed at 12 teaching hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2013. Data collection performed by performance accountability checklist. Analysis was done by SPSS software version 19 using descriptive and analytical statistics test (Pearson correlation coefficient).

Results: In general, the condition of accountability for hospitals' performance (Mean =1.5 from 2) measured "good"(moderate to high). Strategic planning dimension achieved the highest score (Mean±SD:1.85±0.21) and Stakeholder Participation had the lowest score (Mean±SD: 1.12±0.46). There was a positive significant correlation between all variables (except Motivation) and performance accountability.

Conclusion: Weakness in any part of performance can affect other parts and have negative impact on total hospital performance. Mentioning the current situation of accountability for hospitals' performance and its importance, reinforcing weak dimensions and addressing deficiencies in  performance accountability should be consider as managers' top priority.

Background: Today, due to the diversity of organizational structure and culture, the diversity is one of the basic principle in crisis management.Crisis management consists of six components including flexibility, inclusion, trust, risk perception, adaptability and equity.This study aimed at investigating the managers' perception about components of crisis management in hospitals affiliated to Tehran and Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional one. A questionnaire was used to collect data using five likert scale. Validity and reliability of questionnaire assessed by content validity and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Sixty six questionnaire were collected. Data analysis was performed by SPSS software using ANOVA and independent t-test.

Results: The highest and the lowest level of managers' perception were inclusion and equity(3.19 ± 0.51) and adaptability(2.73 ± 0.75), respectively. There was a statistical significant difference between crisis management components with gender and job type. The highest level of importance was regarded to inclusion and mutual trust between personnel and managers, and  the lowest level was related to flexibility in hospital crisis management .

Conclusion: Employees in diverse positions have different definitions of adaptability in crisis. It is necessary to perform further research and educate hospital manager’s duties.