Search published articles


Showing 6 results for Yousefvand

M Arab, M Yousefvand, M Zahavi,
Volume 12, Issue 1 (21 2013)
Abstract

Background: One of the most important advantages of calculating the cost and the bed-day expense is that the government can analyze and compare this cost among different centers and regions of the country and adjust an accurate plan and budget and require governmental units to perform it.
Materials and Methods: this research has been done using a descriptive-analytic with a temporary and retrospective approach. sample selection has been done regarding the question that "whether the orthopedic section is beneficial or not" -based on hospital chief`s demands and with experts
consultation. Related data has been gathered through studying documents, performing interviews and observing related checklists .initially all of the active centers were verified and then each activity`s cost was calculated using the ABC technique.
Results: in the year 1387, cost of each occupied bed for the orthopedic section of Imam Khomeini hospital has been 326818 rials per day. Considering the issue that this sector`s income is provided by selling services based on approved tariffs of ministry of health and medical education which has been 217500 rilas for a double-bed room of first grade hospitals in Tehran in the same year, we could conclude that the occupied Bed-Day cost is 109318 rials more compared to the approved tariff of the targeted year, which shows that the tariff's value is highly less than the bed-day cost.
Conclusion: The enormous variance between Bed-Day cost and the tariff approved by the iranian cabinet will result in forfeit of service providing centers and this could make them serious problems in providing quality services in long term. Therefore, it is essential to set the diagnostic and treatment service's tariffs based on the real cost of these kind of services.
Dr. Mahammad Arab, Pejman Hamouzadeh, Mani Yousefvand, Faroogh Namani, Mahsa Abdi,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (8-2016)
Abstract

Background: One of the main pillars of quality in health services is patient-centered that brings the best outcomes for patients. This study was aimed at comparing the patient-centered situation in selected hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) from the viewpoint of nurses and patients in 2014.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done among 220 nurses (n=103) and hospitalized patients (n=117) in selected hospitals of TUMS. The data gathering instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire which measured seven dimensions of the patient-centered. The validty was confirmed by the opinions of experts and its reliability was 0.96 by Cronbach's alpha. Data analyzes were performed by SPSS software and using one-way ANOVAtest.

Results: Mean score of patient-centered in the studied hospitals from the nurses and patients viewpoint was 2.79 (±0.50) and 2.87 (±0.58), respectively. From the viewpointof nurses and patients, the highest and the lowest mean score were related to the confidentiality and dignity dimension and the patient choice dimension, respectively. Based on ANOVA analysis, there was a significant difference between the mean scores of nurses and patients in quality of amenity and social support dimension (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Patient choice, quality of amenity and prompt attention were identified as priorities for action to improve patient-centered situation in studied hospitals. It is recommended that hospital authorities should be place in a matter of priority the dimensions of the patient-centered which are in poor condition in order to increase the level of patient satisfaction and loyalty.


Ali Akbarisari, Farhad Habibi, Bahman Khosravi, Pejman Hamouzadeh, Mani Yousefvand,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (4-2020)
Abstract

Background: Performance appraisal and quality evaluation of the services provided will achieve the organizational goals and improve the level of staff capability. In order to evaluate accurately and efficiently, we need to use standard indices, to compare the quality and quantity of work with standards, to know the current conditions and to solve its problems
 Methods: This study is an applied study. This was done through a combined method of reviewing the texts and consensus of experts. Initially, the literature review and emergency evaluation indices were extracted, then the duplicate indices were removed and similar indices were merged, then weighted experts and questionnaires were compiled with the indices. Content validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest were used to assess the validity, internal consistency and reproducibility of the questionnaire, respectively. Data were analyzed using Excel and SPSS 20 software.
 Finding: Final questionnaire with 105 questions in 8 areas including management and leadership (15); human resources (22); physical space and facilities (18); medicine and medical equipment (6); guidelines and policies (17); patient-centered (10); documentation of patient records (5); quality and time indices in the emergency department (12). The results showed that the final questionnaire was reliable (0.89) and repeatable (ICC = 0.98).
Conclusion: The Hospital Emergency Performance Assessment Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument and can be used to evaluate the performance of hospital emergency services.
Mani Yousefvand, Alireza Zali, Sajjad Razavi, Hojjat Rahmani, Saeed Manavi, Noureddin Sharifi, Elham Salehian, Ghasem Rajabi Vasoukolai, Bahman Khosravi,
Volume 19, Issue 3 (11-2020)
Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the income changes resulting from the implementation of this book in the hospitals of the University of Medical Sciences.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted based on retrospective information related to the first half of 1398 of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Data related to this study were collected from patients' records using hospital information system and hospital intelligent management system of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. In order to analyze the data, the average of Rials per service was used for each hospital and type of admission.
Results: The results showed that with the implementation of the book of relative value 2018, the total income of the studied hospitals will increase by 10.67%. In total, the share of total book codes included in the study is 41% of the total, of which 20% is the professional component, 19% is the technical component and 2.4% is anesthesia. After book codes, hoteling with 26% and consumer goods with 14% and medicine with 11% make up the rest.
Conclusion: The approach of the 2018 book is more towards temporary inpatient services and encourages providers not to admit patients to receive services. Also in this book, the proper growth of the technical component of services will occur, which in other words indicates the approach and encouragement of investment in the hospital sector.
Hojjat Rahmani, Ghasem Rajabi Vasoukola, Rajabali Daroudi, Mani Yousefvand, Zeinab Fakoorfard,
Volume 19, Issue 4 (12-2020)
Abstract

Background: Considering the importance and position of the health sector in socio-economic development programs, it is necessary to be aware of the current situation and to recognize its issues and problems. Determining costs and the amount of profit or even loss in the health sector helps in managing costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost of common laboratory services and compare them with the tariffs approved by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in the selected hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Materials and Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional and retrospective study. In this study, activity-based costing technique was used. The study population was the laboratory of the selected hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools were information forms, software, interviews and direct observation. The analysis was performed using Excel 2016 software and finally, the cost price was compared with the approved tariff.
Results: The findings indicated that the highest and lowest costs were related to the cost of manpower and energy carriers, respectively. The highest cost was related to the urine analysis test and the lowest was related to the sodium and potassium tests.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the cost of conventional laboratory services in the selected hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the tariffs approved by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2019 were different.
Pegah Salimi Pormehr, Mani Yousefvand, Mahnaz Mirsane, Naser Yousefzadeh Kandovani,
Volume 20, Issue 4 (12-2021)
Abstract

Background and Objectives: the  purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Yas Job Satisfaction Questionnaire in order to develop a useful tool for measuring and evaluating job satisfaction among Yas Hospital Complex staff.
Materials and Methods: Face validity, content validity ratio, and content validity index were used to evaluate the questionnaire's validity and reliability. Cronbach's alpha and the halving technique were used among 150 medical personnel in this cross-sectional study The key elements of the final questionnaire were four dimensions of leadership style, job nature, reward system, performance appraisal, and organizational climate.To report the mean of quantitative variables at different levels, qualitative factors were evaluated and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Results: There were 111 females and 39 males among the 150 participants. The content validity ratio and content validity index were both acceptable.Cronbach's alpha method reported a reliability of 0.92 for the questionnaire, indicating that the internal reliability is acceptable.The lowest level of satisfaction was in the leadership style dimension, with an average of 10.53 4.91, while the highest level of satisfaction was in the job nature dimension, with an average of 21.24 7.05.

Conclusion: The Yas Job Satisfaction Questionnaire has acceptable validity and reliability to assess the level of job satisfaction among medical staff, according to the findings of this study. Furthermore, job satisfaction was moderate in most of the dimentions surveyed.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb