General users only can access the published articles
Showing 2 results for Subject:
Ali Ardalan, Arezu Najafi, Anita Sabzghabaie, Vahid Zonoobi, Saeed Ardalan, Hamidreza Khankeh, Gholamreza Masoumi , Mohsen Abbasi, Amir Nejati, Mehdi Zahabi,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (7 2011)
Abstract
Background: vulnerable events could damage structural, non structural and functional components of hospitals that might lead to community crisis, accordingly. Risk assessment is the first step to develop of a hospital disaster plan. In this study, a primary phase of developing a local tool for Iran's hospital disaster risk assessment entitled "Hospital Safety Index (HSI)" was conducted by World Health Organization originally.
Materials and Methods: First, the original index was translated into Farsi in five forms and 145 items. Then a group of four experts from the fields of medicine and engineering assessed the items one-by-one for their relevance and applicability. Revised edition tested three times at Shariati hospital in Tehran. An expert panel also evaluated the feature and content validity of the index. They also weighted the items as well.
Results: Test-retest of the index by two independent research groups found 93% of agreement. Furthermore, 244 points were revised or added to the original edition. The most important changes included: Combining instruction parts with related items for increasing educational properties, completing the list of hazards, developing a plan to analysis, and to present a quantitative and graphic of the model and finally to prepare an educational package as well.
Conclusion: Persian version of HSI, in response to needs of Iranian's health system, represents a rapid no-expensive tool for screening disaster risks at hospitals based on an international template that was tested in several countries. Based on this study, the Farsi index would be evaluated in more hospitals around the country. The assessment results will provide Iranian's health system with evidence-based information for more effective allocated resources and interventions evaluating.
Yahya Salimi, Ali Kazemi-Karyani, Shahin Soltani, Farid Najafi, Zhila Azimi, Bahman Roshani, Sina Ahmadi, Satar Rezaei,
Volume 21, Issue 1 (5-2022)
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of health sector evolution plan (HSEP) on the prevalence of cesarean section and vaginal delivery in public hospitals in Kermanshah province.
Methods: In the present study, cesarean section (C-section) and vaginal delivery data were collected and evaluated in 17 public hospitals from 2009 to 2019. The main variables of this study included the prevalence of C-section and the prevalence of vaginal delivery for 121 months, both were obtained by dividing the number of deliveries by C-section and vaginal delivery by the total number. Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine the effect of HSEP on the prevalence of cesarean and vaginal delivery rates.
Results: The prevalence of C-section before and after the HSEP was 42.5% and 43.2%, respectively. Months before the intervention, the rate of C-section was increasing by 0.13%, which was statistically significant. In the first month after the intervention, the prevalence of C-section decreased by 3.6% that was statistically significant. The share of C-section in the months after the implementation of the HSEP showed a monthly increase of 0.12% compared to before the intervention, which was statistically significant.
Conclusions: The results of the study showed that the HSEP has led to a significant reduction in C-section in short term, but in the months after the implementation of the plan, the prevalence of C-section has increased again.
