General users only can access the published articles
Showing 253 results for Subject:
M Arab, M Hosseini, M Ranjbar, A Rashidian, A Pourreza, M Varmaghani, M Tajvar,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (7 2011)
Abstract
Background: The elderly population in Iran is increasing . The aim of this study is the survey of satisfaction rate and the effective factors on the elderly - aged peoples satisfaction regarding to the given services in the hospitals affiliated to the Tehran university of medical sciences.
Materials & Methods: This research is a descriptive - analytical study with applied results. It shows the problems cross - section ally.The research society involves the whole elderly - aged people whit 65 years old and more than that used the bedridden services of the hospitals affiliated to the Tehran university of medical sciences. The sample involves 360 elderly. For collecting the data, a questionnaire with three parts was used. The validity of questionnaire by the content measurement and the reliability of questionnaire by test re test (r = 0.84) were achieved. And also we used SPSS software for data analysis.
Results: : Results showed that 25/6%patients from management type, 41/9%from facilities ,17/2% from behavior personality and 30/3% from public services are dissatisfaction. A total of 12 variable were analyzed, and the results showed that: The education level, age, sex, type of refer, dealing with the bed shortage and occupations have the meaningful relation with their satisfaction rate. The one - variable - analyzers in the logistic regration model showed that among the whole meaningful variables, the education level has the strongest relation with satisfaction. With increasing the education level, the satisfaction rate have been decreased.
Conclusion: Due to results satisfaction rate among participant of this study is good and accepted. Using of results is effective step in increase productivity services and further evaluation needed to be done for functional styles patient elderly satisfaction.
F Akbari, F Kokabi, Sh Yousefian,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (7 2011)
Abstract
Background: Hospital is the most expensive part of a health system. Manpower is the mainly valuable factor in productivity and service delivery. Since personnel costs make up more than 60% of hospital costs, increasing productivity and efficiency of human resources are significant. The most important ways to increase utilization of this valuable resource is to standardize the quantity and composition of the human distribution. This study determined the standardizing of nurses resources in a sample hospital.
Materials & Methods: The descriptive and cross-sectional study applied in 2008. Data of study collected by questionnaires and library studies by using descriptive statistics were analyzed. Sample of study is the private general hospital with 85 active beds, including gynecology, surgery, men and children, women, surgery, neonatal intensive care wards. Data collection tools were tables containing the number and composition of nurses and hospital performance indicators. After gathering data, it compared with the standards and recommendations were conducted. Using standard of job hours of nursing care required for each group of patients and protocols of Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Findings: The numbers of nursing staff in the hospital were 96 people, including 38 nurses, 16 assistance nurses and 42 aid nurses. The optimum numbers based on average annual bed occupancy in different sectors were: 94 nurses, including 60 nurses, 34 assistance nurses and aid nurses.
Conclusion: A sample hospital uses healthcare workers as an aid nurses to assist in a wide range of patients' care. With regard to development of medical sciences and become more specialized nursing care industry and major changes in techniques and equipments, to move on from traditional invasive surgical procedures to non-invasive medical practices and the incidence of further complex cases, it will be effected to replace them with educated nurses to care of patients.
, , , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , ,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (21 2011)
Abstract
, , , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (23 2011)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 4 (20 2012)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 4 (20 2012)
Abstract
, , , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 4 (20 2012)
Abstract
, , , ,
Volume 10, Issue 4 (20 2012)
Abstract