Showing 3 results for Care Quality
M Keshavarz, A Akbari Sari, A Rahimi Foroshani, M Arab,
Volume 13, Issue 1 (6-2014)
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Accreditation is a program that is designed for evaluation of health care organizations and measured processes and structures according to predetermined standards. The purpose of this study is to survey the safety situation and quality of care in selected hospitals of Tehran University of medical sciences based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) standards and determination of their strengths and weaknesses.
Materials and Method: This descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out in 5 hospitals. Translated Joint Commission International (JCI) questionnaire checklist with 14 standards was used as the study tool. Data entry and statistical analysis were performed using the SPSS.13 and K Independent Samples tests were used to compare hospitals.
Results: Highest quality and safety of care score belonged to the hospital B (84%) and then to hospitals C (83%), A (72.75%), E (72%) and D (70.5%). Central indices like patient and family rights, quality improvement and patient safety, infection prevention and control standards in the studied hospitals are completely different according to the statistical results.
Conclusion: Study results show that the status of hospitals in terms of safety and quality of care are almost appropriate but in some cases there is a large distance between JCI standards and their current status and the studied hospitals have to make appropriate and related policies in order to plan and implement proper programs to improve their situation in quality and safety of care.
Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi Heydari Baghdad Abadi, Alireza Maetoofi, Ali Farhadi Mahali, Mojtaba Tabari,
Volume 23, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Hospitals play a critical role in promoting public health and well-being in social contexts. This necessitates codified standards aimed at maintaining treatment quality and enhancing social satisfaction. Hospital accreditation policy evaluation is considered a systematic process that can have significant social and functional implications for hospitals. This study aims to present an evaluation model of hospital accreditation policy based on the process of paradigmatic phenomenology.
Methods: Using Husserl's (1970) phenomenological approach, this study developed a paradigmatic evaluation model in five analytical steps. First, through interviews with experts and open coding, propositional themes related to the phenomenon under study were identified. A focus group was then formed to discuss and analyze these propositions. Each proposition was scored using the Q-method checklist, with scores ranging from +6 to -6, to identify paradigmatic clusters.
Results: During the qualitative analysis, 16 interviews resulted in 138 open codes. After eliminating redundancies and overlapping codes, 50 propositional themes were finalized. These themes were organized into conceptual clusters within the framework of paradigmatic phenomenology, following Husserl's methodological steps.
Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the formation of a hospital accreditation policy evaluation model structured around causal, intervening, contextual conditions, strategies, and outcomes. This model has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare service delivery and improve the overall quality of treatment in society.
Ali Ghaffarian, Azam Cheraghi, Masoud Ferdosi,
Volume 23, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Accreditation is one of the most widely recognized and reliable methods for evaluating the quality of hospital services. However, its implementation is often accompanied by various challenges for hospitals. This study aimed to identify the challenges associated with accreditation in small and single-specialty hospitals from the perspective of those involved in the process.
Methods: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted with the participation of 30 individuals, including hospital staff, national accreditation evaluators, and experts from the Ministry of Health's Monitoring and Accreditation Office. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and individual sessions. Content analysis was used to process the data, which was analyzed using Max-QDA software (version 20).
Results: The accreditation challenges of small hospitals were categorized into four main themes: "accreditation process," "human resources," "structural issues," and "financial constraints." For single-specialty hospitals, challenges were grouped into three themes: "accreditation process," "human resources," and "uniformity of accreditation standards." Common challenges for both hospital types included low staff motivation, insufficient training in accreditation procedures, and issues related to evaluators.
Conclusion: In addition to general accreditation challenges, small and single-specialty hospitals face unique obstacles due to their specific conditions and inherent differences from other hospitals. To ensure the successful implementation of accreditation programs in Iran, policymakers should thoroughly examine the identified challenges and incorporate these insights into national hospital accreditation planning and implementation strategies.
