Journal of

---

In many countries, different methods and tools for improving the quality of health cares have been used. Among these methods, the NHS clinical governance provided by the NHS British government as a strategy to enhance the quality of clinical cares was introduced in 1998. Clinical governance both responsibilities for maintain the current level of cares and improving the quality of future care are emphasized. Materials & Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinical governance and organizational performance of hospitals in Ardabil. The research is an applied one questionnaire is used to collecting data. The population comprises patients, doctors employees and hospitals managers of Ardabil 180 were selected as the sample. To investigate the hypothesis test, correlation and regression analysis were used. Results: According to data, there is a significant relationship between organizational performance and clinical governance. On the other hand, the results of F test showed meaningful level for the components of %99, so we can use linear regression. Furthermore, the coefficient of all the components of clinical governance has a positive and significant effect on performance. Among the components of clinical governance, clinical audit component has %163 of the minimum amount, and staff management component 908 percent has the most effect on hospital performance. Conclusion: According to the results, are considered essential patient’s engagement in treatment, the use of information and patients' family’s experiences to provide more services to patients, credit allocation for staff training and staff expertise in the field of employees training.

---

Background: consideration of hand hygiene can reduce health care infections effectively. Prevalence of poor hand hygiene consideration will lead to enhance morbidity, mortality and costs. This study aimed at assessing hand hygiene process of nurses by clinical audit method in a selected general hospital in Tabriz.

Materials and Methods: this study was an interventional one using clinical audit method which  was conducted during seven months in surgery, internal, child and women units in a selected general hospital in Tabriz in 2013-2014. The study was carried out on nurses in all shifts (morning, evening and night). Study instrument were monitoring performance checklist and hand washing observation. Checklist was developed by WHO and Ministry of Health guideline.

Results: the total number of situation in pre-intervention was 252 which increased to 336 by the interventions implementation. The overall rate of compatibility of hand hygiene process with standards was 59.94% in pre-intervention which promoted to 80.56% after intervention implementation.

Conclusion: This study reveals using clinical audit is a method to improve quality of hand hygiene process. 

---

Background: Medication administration is an important part of care process. Correct medication administration and its accordance with standards are essential concerning the significant effects on patients’ health. Hence, this study was designed and carried out to determine Medication administration process using “clinical audit”.

Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional one which carried out with “clinical audit” in a hospital of Tabriz city in 2014. This audit conducted in six steps as followed: 1) selecting topic of clinical audit, 2) determining the criteria and standards, 3) assessment of current status, 4) comparing current situation with standards( Standards of Ministry of Health, Medication safety handbook, medication administration curriculum and NHS guideline in medication management), 5) designing and implementing intervention and 6) re-audit. In order to organize process evaluation, a valid instrument used via observation and checklist.

Results: Results of this audit study revealed that 11 out of 25 assessed steps had very low accordance with standards (less than 15%) and the average accordance of total process was 47 percent before intervention. However, the average of standard adherence rate increased to 78 percent after intervention implementation.

Conclusions: The results indicated the effectiveness of educational intervention programs in using kardex instead of medication card on improving medication administration process generally. In spite of the occurred improvement, it is necessary to have an ongoing assessment and intervention in order to quality improvement. 

---

Background: The present research aimed to assess the readiness of selected hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences to implement quality improvement programs and clinical audits from the viewpoint of managers.
Materials and Methods: A descriptive-analytic study was conducted in May 2017 in four selected hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The study population of this study was 20 managers of selected hospitals who were selected by census sampling method and entered the study. The data gathering tool was a two-part questionnaire whose validity and reliability were confirmed. In this study, we used SPSS software version 23 and statistical tests to analyze the data.
Results: The effectiveness and readiness of hospitals to implement a clinical audit program was equal to 60% in the field of data and information, cardiology and feedback; 55% in resources, design and implementation, clinical audit management, and evidence and standards; 50% in illness and education; and 45% in manpower. Also, with increasing frequency of clinical audits, hospital readiness for quality improvement processes increases.
Conclusion: Due to the effectiveness and low readiness of hospitals in implementing a clinical audit program, especially in the field of human resources (45%), it is necessary that managers and planners of clinical audit programs in hospitals have a precise knowledge of these factors in order to control the organizational environment and help improve the effectiveness of audit programs.