Journal of

---

Background: Hospitals are best places to provide preventive and health promotion services along with healthcare services. These studies aimed at determine the effect of establishing health promoting hospitals’ standards on hospitals indicators in Fatemieh hospital.

Materials and Methods: This is a comparative study which was conducted in Fatemieh (case) and Khatamolanbia (control) hospitals in 2013. The standards of health promoting hospitals as an independent variable were established in Fatemieh hospital. Data related to indicators of leaving hospital with personal satisfaction, Cardio pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and neonatal mortality were collected in both hospitals in second half of 2012 and first half of 2013. SPSS version 16 used for data analysis and Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were utilized. The results were shown by comparative tables.

Results: The neonatal mortality rate before and after the intervention was 7.28 and 14.03 in case hospital, while this rate was 5.26 and 10.83 in control hospital respectively. The percentage of leaving hospital with personal satisfaction before and after interventions was 3.43% and 2.93% respectively in case hospital and success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in this group was 56.1% and 61.3% correspondingly. There was no significant relation between establishing standards of health promoting hospitals and indicators of leaving hospital with personal satisfaction and neonatal mortality in Fatemieh hospital, while significant relation was obtained between promoting of cardiopulmonary resuscitation indicator and standards of health promoting hospital in mentioned hospital(P=0.001).

Conclusion: Initial results revealed that establishment of health promoting hospitals’ standards had positive effects in Fatemieh hospital and lead to improve a number of indicators. 

---

Background: The Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) initiative emphasizes on changes in traditional hospitals’ approach in care provision. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence required for successful planning and implementation of the HPH in the country’s educational hospitals.
 
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, opinions of 300 frontline health professionals working in the ten educational hospitals affiliated to the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences were examined using validated tools in 2016. Descriptive data analysis procedures and logistic regression analysis (using Enter method) were applied by SPSS software version 22. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05.
 
Results: The mean scores and SD for applicability of the HPH standards were 66.06±17.51. Gender (OR=3.19 95%CI: 1.33- 8.40), occupation type (OR= 1.50 95% CI: 0.65- 0.70), hospital type (general vs. specialized) (OR= 1.59 95%CI: 1.10- 1.25), number of active beds (OR=3.84 95% CI: 1.56-9.42) and having prior knowledge about the HPH program (OR=2.81 95% CI: 1.31-4.80) were identified as significant predictors of the HPH standards’ feasibility in the studied hospitals.
 
Conclusion: Given that study findings, at least the baseline subjective inclination to adapt the HPH standards in the educational hospitals do not exist through the Iranian health care providers’ points of view. As the first step in progress towards preparation for implementing the HPH standards, planning of tailor-made educational programs for hospitals’ staff in Iran is recommended.