Showing 2 results for Hospital Accreditation
Dr Ebrahim Jaafaripouyan, Dr Alimohammad Mosadeghrad, Abbas Salarvand,
Volume 17, Issue 3 (11-2018)
Abstract
Background: Accreditation is one of the health sector evaluation methods that used to promote healthcare quality. The study aimed to identifiy the strength and weakness of accreditation surveyors and the impact of their performances.
Materials and Methods: This study is a qualitative research which conducted between hospital accreditation stakeholders in 2016- 2017. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews and analyzed by a thematic analysis method.
Results: The findings of in strengthen were categorized in 7 themes. The main strengthen was acceptance of accreditation by surveyors, educational approach, reputation, personal effort to develop knowledge and skills, and existence of senior surveyors. Our results for weakness were classified in 8 themes. The main weaknesses were lack of sufficient knowledge, experience, skills and weakness in personal characteristics. Based on the findings, the accreditation surveyors’ performance was evaluated as under-moderate in past two periods of hospital accreditation. The interviewees announced that weakness of surveyors’ performances was one of the main effective factors of low stability of accreditation results.
Conclusion: Recruitment of surveyors based on main competence, education and empowerment of surveyors, and assessing the surveyors can lead to more validity of accreditation results and finally lead to increasing the commitment of hospitals to quality.
Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi Heydari Baghdad Abadi, Alireza Maetoofi, Ali Farhadi Mahali, Mojtaba Tabari,
Volume 23, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Hospitals play a critical role in promoting public health and well-being in social contexts. This necessitates codified standards aimed at maintaining treatment quality and enhancing social satisfaction. Hospital accreditation policy evaluation is considered a systematic process that can have significant social and functional implications for hospitals. This study aims to present an evaluation model of hospital accreditation policy based on the process of paradigmatic phenomenology.
Methods: Using Husserl's (1970) phenomenological approach, this study developed a paradigmatic evaluation model in five analytical steps. First, through interviews with experts and open coding, propositional themes related to the phenomenon under study were identified. A focus group was then formed to discuss and analyze these propositions. Each proposition was scored using the Q-method checklist, with scores ranging from +6 to -6, to identify paradigmatic clusters.
Results: During the qualitative analysis, 16 interviews resulted in 138 open codes. After eliminating redundancies and overlapping codes, 50 propositional themes were finalized. These themes were organized into conceptual clusters within the framework of paradigmatic phenomenology, following Husserl's methodological steps.
Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the formation of a hospital accreditation policy evaluation model structured around causal, intervening, contextual conditions, strategies, and outcomes. This model has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of healthcare service delivery and improve the overall quality of treatment in society.
