Journal of

Background: Strategic plan in hospitals will not be run spontaneously and managers encountered with some barriers in order to have a successful strategic planning implementation. This study aimed at recognizing the barriers of strategic plan implementation from hospital managers' perspective.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in all Kerman hospitals in 2014. Fifty three individuals including chairmen, internal administrators, quality improvement managers, matrons and strategic plan executers participated by census sampling method. Data was collected using a questionnaire including demographic information and human, processes, structures and institutions factors affecting the strategies implementation. Data analysis was performed by SPSS software version21.

Results:  Study results revealed that the barriers to strategic plan implementation were structural factors (27.71±6.68), process agents (19.54±10.06), human factors (19.09±5.37) and institutional factors (15.73±4.52) respectively. There was no significant association between management background and barriers of strategic plan implementation in hospitals (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In order to achieve desired results, chairmen and hospitals managers should be entirely conscious about barriers /failure factors of strategic decisions concerning foresight and appropriate managing or approaches change during strategic management process implementation. 

Background: Hospital managers' success depends not only on internal of the hospital environment, but also on the external. Considering the importance of the social responsibility of hospitals as an external organizational issue, this study aimed to assess the importance of social responsibility and the implementation status of hospitals.
Materials and Methods: This analytical descriptive study was conducted in Kermanshah educational hospitals in 2016. The study population consisted of management team of each hospital in middle and first-line level, of which 150 were selected using census sampling method. The data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. Validity and reliability of the instrument was confirmed. Data analysis was performed using SPSS20 software, descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The mean score of importance and status of social responsibility implementation were high (86.20 ± 9.98) and moderate (60.62 ± 12.41), respectively. Among the domains, the highest and the least attention were paid to environment (11.65 ± 88.30) and suppliers (13.47 ± 81.48) domains, respectively. The highest level of accountability in patients was (68.87 ± 26/14) and the least was found in organizational processes (14.47 ± 42.02). There was a significant statistically difference in social status according to organizational status and employment type (p <0.05).
Conclusion: The results revealed that the rate of social responsibility of hospitals was moderate. It seems that providing a systematic assessment of managers performance and authorities, functional feedback and using the successful experiences of organizations in the field of social responsibility are necessary.