Journal of

---

Background: Reporting of  medication errors  leads to saving Patients &apossafety and also is counted as a valuable information source for further prevention of mistake in future.  The aim of this study was to determine the reasons for refusing to report medication errors from the viewpoints of nurses.

Material and Methods:In this descriptive study, 140 of 200 nurses who were employees of Baharlo hospital of Tehran participated in the study (response rate = 70%). Data were collected through a questionnaire. Test- retest analysis conducted for measuring reliability of the questionnaire and content and face validity of the instrument confirmed by key statisticians and methodologists. . SPSS software and descriptive statistics were used for analyzing the collected data. 

Results:Our findings indicate that the reasons of not reporting medication errors were Management factors (3.68 ± 1.12), Fear of reporting outcomes (3.09 ± 1.68) and Process related to reporting (2.73± 1.26). Management factors domain was the major cause of refuse of reporting medication errors. 

Conclusion:Since medication errors seem to be unavoidable, suppression, decreasing medication error depends on using a systematic approach with emphasis on management and nursing care. 

---

Background: Hospital is the most expensive part of a health system. Manpower is the mainly valuable factor in productivity and service delivery. Since personnel costs make up more than 60% of hospital costs, increasing productivity and efficiency of human resources are significant. The most important ways to increase utilization of this valuable resource is to standardize the quantity and composition of the human distribution. This study determined the standardizing of nurses resources in a sample hospital.

Materials & Methods: The descriptive and cross-sectional study applied in 2008. Data of study collected by questionnaires and library studies by using descriptive statistics were analyzed. Sample of study is the private general hospital with 85 active beds, including gynecology, surgery, men and children, women, surgery, neonatal intensive care wards. Data collection tools were tables containing the number and composition of nurses and hospital performance indicators. After gathering data, it compared with the standards and recommendations were conducted. Using standard of job hours of nursing care required for each group of patients and protocols of Ministry of Health and Medical Education.

Findings: The numbers of nursing staff in the hospital were 96 people, including 38 nurses, 16 assistance nurses and 42 aid nurses. The optimum numbers based on average annual bed occupancy in different sectors were: 94 nurses, including 60 nurses, 34 assistance nurses and aid nurses.

Conclusion: A sample hospital uses healthcare workers as an aid nurses to assist in a wide range of patients' care. With regard to development of medical sciences and become more specialized nursing care industry and major changes in techniques and equipments, to move on from traditional invasive surgical procedures to non-invasive medical practices and the incidence of further complex cases, it will be effected to replace them with educated nurses to care of patients.

---

Background: Nurses are the largest group of health care providers and emergency department is known as a high risk ward in terms of occupational injuries. The aim of current study is to make out nursing occupational hazards in the emergency department among teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Materials and Methods: The study carried outed on 250 emergency department’s nursing staff of hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. A valid and reliable questionnare used for data gathering by Simple random sampling method. Data analysed using descriptive snd inferential statistics.

Results: The level of mean and SD of occupational injuries (2.87 ± 0.55) was assessed moderate. Among occupational hazzards, Psychosocial and institutional (3.58 ± 0.47) and Ergonomic (3.57 ± 0.71) ones were the most prevalent occupational hazards respectively and chemical hazards were the least important source of occupational injury. There was a statistical significant association of occupational injuries and variables such as hospital, years in practice, educational level, type of employment and training courses in occupational hazards (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Nurses exposes a range of risk factors in different domains regarding occupational injuries. With the purpose of eliminating the risk factors, it needs to run various strategies in different domains. Applying ergonomic approaches, developing appropriate educational programs, providing adequate training in this area, etc., can result in reduceing occupational injuries and increasing their productivity.

---

Background and Aim: Conflict between health workers is an important problem in health care units around the world. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups in the hospital.
 
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2018. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire was designed in two parts: demographic variables and causes of conflict between nursing and other occupational groups with a Likert scale of 5 points. 120 nursing staff of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences randomly selected were surveyed. Data were analyzed by SPSS software15 using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
 
Results: The highest rate of conflict reported by nurses was related to the conflict with the group of managers (4.17±0.94) and the lowest rate was with administrative, financial and support staff (3.55±1.13). The most important reasons for conflict between nursing staff and different groups were: imposing non-specialist roles (such as completing doctors' documentation); perceived inequality in workload distribution; insufficient understanding of nursing work conditions; unreasonable differences in salaries and other benefits, and unfair distribution of manpower. There was also a statistically significant correlation between the level of conflict with marital status, work experience, age group (p <0.05).
 
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the role of some factors causing conflict between nursing staff and other occupational groups. These findings could be a practical guide for hospital managers in making practical decisions and strategies for managing workplace conflicts.