Showing 5 results for Operating Room
Mohammad Arab, Farugh Mohammadian, Abdolrasoul Rahmani, Abbas Rahimi, Leyla Omidi, Parvin Abbasi Brojeni, Mehdi Asghari,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2014)
Abstract
Background and Objective: The operating room is one of the main units in hospital, where the most important phase of patient treatment is performed. This study aimed to investigate the safety attitude among the staff of operating room in selected hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: In this descriptive - analytical study, 230 staff of operating room of hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of medical sciences were selected by Random cluster sampling. Research tool was a safety attitude questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha 0.854) that classified in 3 categories: demographic questions (11questions), quality of communications (14questions) and safety attitude questions (58 questions). All data collected were analyzed using SPSS18. T-test, Spearman correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square have been used for data analyzing.
Results: The results indicated that 90.9% of staffs had moderate safety attitude and the average of the safety attitude score was 188.52(± 22.4). As the results showed, there was a positive and significant relationship between the safety attitude score and age, total work experience and work experience at hospital (p 046/0=, r =±0.141). There were significant differences between: average of the safety attitude score among men and women (P=0.047) average of the safety attitude score among staffs who have been trained and untrained safety (P=0.004).
Conclusion: The safety attitude score among the staff. It is therefore necessary to implement the effective interventions to improve safety attitude among operating room staff in understudy hospitals.
Keywords: Safety attitude, Operating Room, Hospital, Staff
Dr Zahra Kavosi, Fateme Setoodehzadeh, Mozhgan Fardid, Maryam Gholami, Marzie Khojastefar, Mahbube Hatam, Zahra Tahiati, Gholamreza Fardid,
Volume 16, Issue 3 (11-2017)
Abstract
Background: Reduction of errors is necessary to improve the quality of healthcare, promoting communication between the hospital staff and patients, and decreasing the patient's complaints in hospitals. Due to the high probability of error in the operating room (OR), this study aimed to detect the potential errors in the OR of Nemazee hospital using FMEA.
Materials and Methods: This study was a qualitative one which assessed Failure Mode and effects of OR in six steps using FMEA technique. At First, the OR activities were listed, then the failure modes were recognized. Next, the Risk Priority Number (RPN) of each error was calculated according to the indicators of Occurrence (O), Severity (S) and Detectability (D).
Results: Totally,204 failure modes in 36 activities in five process in surgery ward were recognized.15.7 percent of failure modes classified as high risk factors (RPN ≥ 100). The most and the least distribution of origin factors were related to human and organization and technical errors, respectively.
Conclusion: The majority of errors in OR was set in of human skills category. Besides, the most and the least failure modes were belonged to “patient anesthesia by circular activity number 20, RPN=1795.23)” and “not to oxygenation for patients (the activity number 36, RPN=99.33) respectively. Identification of 36 activities and 204 errors in the 5 processes of Operating Room represents the comprehensiveness of HFMEA method in the identification, classification, evaluation and analysis of the health system errors.
Soodabeh Khosravi, Dr Sayed Abolfazl Zakerian , Dr Khadijeh Adabi Bavil Aliaei , Dr Kamal Azam, Abolfazl Aliari,
Volume 16, Issue 4 (2-2018)
Abstract
Background:Human reliability assessment consists ofusing quantitative and qualitative methods to predict human contribution to the occurrence of error;so, using reliability assessment techniques is necessary to prevent and limit the consequences of errors in sensitive work environments.Healthcare considers as the high-risk areas.With due attention to the high rates of cesarean section in Iran, this study aimed at evaluating human reliability during this operation.
Materials and Methods:This was a qualitative-descriptive study which was performed as a cross-sectional one using the EMEA technique. At first, the process of operation was divided in to tasks and sub-tasks using the method of hierarchical task analysis. Then, according to the EMEA instructions, the work sheet was completed for all personnel in the operating room.
Results: A total of 126 errors, including 40 errors (31.75%) related to circular nurse activities, 34 errors (26.98%) related to anesthesia activities, 33 errors (26.19%) related to scrub nurse activities and 19 errors (15.08%) related to the activities of the surgeon, were identified.In general, skill-based errors (51.59%) and judgment-based errors (1.59%) were the highest and the lowest amount, respectively.
Conclusion:According to the study results, among three working groups, skill-based errors forcircularand scrub nurses and anesthesiology expert with the most frequency, and knowledge-based errorsfor surgeon tasks, with the highest frequency should be considered as priorities tocontrol errors.
Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad, Fatemeh Khalaj,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (4-2020)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Electrocautery is a very important tool in surgery. Electrocautery burn is a common side effect of operation surgeries. Quality management is a useful strategy for improving the quality and safety of hospital services. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of quality management on reducing electrocautery burns.
Materials and methods: A participatory action research was conducted in the operating theatre of a hospital in Tehran, Iran, in 2013 and 2014. A quality improvement team was established in the hospital operating theatre. The quality improvement team using an 8-step quality management model, standardized working processes, identified quality goals for the processes and improved them until achieved the quality goals. Data on electrocautery burns was collected before and after the intervention and compared.
Results: Electrocautery burn rate was 0.40% in 2012. A wet patient due to sweating or washing during the surgery, in-appropriate patient position, faulty earth well, faulty anti-static mattress and long usage of electrocautery devices were the main reasons of electrocautery burn injuries. Accordingly an action plan was developed and implemented for preventing and reducing electrocautery burns. Consequently, electrocautery burn rate was reduced to 0.21% and 0.02% in 2013 and 2014. Electrocautery burn was significantly reduced by 95% in two years.
Conclusion: Electrocautery burns can be easily prevented using the quality management strategy. Implementing an appropriate quality management model appropriately in a supportive environment enhances the safety of hospital services.
Elham Ramezan Pour, Hojjat Rahmani, Mehdi Raadabadi, Ghasem Rajabi Vasokolaei, Neda Rashidi,
Volume 19, Issue 2 (8-2020)
Abstract
Introduction: The operating room is one of the most sophisticated workplaces, consisting of a vast array of electrical, gas and radiation equipment that are more susceptible to accident than other hospital departments. Therefore it is important to observe safety tips in this section. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the standard of safety in operating rooms of hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2019.
Method: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The statistical population consisted of all operating rooms of hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. The tool used was a checklist that was completed by researchers by observation and interviewing on-site. Safety standards have been evaluated in terms of the physical space of the operating room, fire safety, personnel safety, patient safety, infection control. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21.
Results: The operating rooms of university-affiliated hospitals were 80.10% secure in overall safety. The patient's safety area, with 83.34%, had the shortest distance from the standards and the infection control safety area, with 74.24%, had the highest distance from the standards. The highest and lowest scores were related to the safety standard related to the operating room of hospitals (2) and (1).
Conclusion: According to the findings, the operating rooms of the studied hospitals are generally in desirable compliance with safety standards. However, it is essential to pay attention to problem areas to increase the safety factor for staff and patients in the operating room, so appropriate remedial measures should be taken to ensure complete safety of the operating room for all components.
