Showing 2 results for Participation
Movahed Kor E, Arab M., Akbari Sari A, Hosseini M,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
Background: Focusing on making opportunities to participate of patients in all levels of health care system is important in order to develop of system capability that could make improving of patients’ safety and quality of care services. The aim of this study was to determine inpatient perceptions in general hospitals of Tehran medical university regarding patient participate in treatment decisions and safety.
Material and methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 1390. First, the list of eight general hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of medical sciences and all clinical wards were obtained through the university website. Then, stratified random sampling method applied to collect 300 patients as a sample size. Data were collected by using a structured questionnaire that validity and reliability were accepted. Descriptive statistical methods, linear regression and multivariate logistic regression were applied to analyze.
Results: From total of 300 patients, 60% of them were female. The level of participating by patients in cure decision making were at high level (59.7%) and 27% in low level. The range of patients’ safety was at high (60%) and low (26%). The level of participate in decision making of cure process had high rate among young people and employed participants. The patients who were unmarried, educated, and employed had lower score in patients’ safety. The participants’ perception had no effect on the patients’ safety perceptions.
Conclusion: The symptoms that might be interpreted as an abnormal could be interpreted in different ways by the others. These unusual results could come from dissimilarities in demographic features
Hassan Niroomand Sadabad, Ali Vafaee Najar, Elahe Houshmand, Jamshid Jamali, Zahra Keyvanloo, Mahdi Dehnavi,
Volume 21, Issue 4 (1-2023)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Considering the important role of doctors in the implementation of accreditation standards and the necessity of their involvement in this process, this study was conducted in order to identify the views of doctors regarding the challenges of participating in accreditation programs in social security hospitals in Mashhad.
Materials and methods: This study is a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical research that was conducted in two hospitals of the Social Security Organization of Mashhad, Iran. in 2022. The participants were 56 full-time working doctors with at least one year of work experience in the hospital. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 26 software.
Findings: Among the challenges of doctors' participation in accreditation programs , the dimensions of the motivational mechanism (3.96±0.63) , provision of suitable resources for the implementation of accreditation (3.83±0.78), physician empowerment programs (3.78±0.73) and the role of the quality improvement office in attracting doctors' participation (3.75±0.74) were more important from the doctors' point of view, and patients' demands (2.90±0.75) and role ambiguity 2.77±0.96), were less important in their opinion.
Conclusion: Managers should consider that employee motivation and resource allocation are necessary for the effective implementation of the accreditation standard. Empowering doctors in the implementation of accreditation standards as well as the participation of quality improvement offices to interact with doctors and attract their participation are very important factors.
