Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Performance Improvement

M Yaghoubi, S Karimi, A Hasanzadeh, M Javadi, Ha Mandegar, F Abedi,
Volume 8, Issue 3 (2-2010)
Abstract

Background: If a managers try for further income or productivity so they must attentive their staff incentive. One of the most issue in the management process is that managers can distinguish strength of staff but they can't determine their weakness . ACHIEVE model present seven factors ( ability, clarify, help, incentive , evaluation, validity , environment ) that effective to staff performance . and this model help manager to determine cause of performance problem. And create change strategy for solving those problem .
Material & Methods: It is descriptive , survey and inferential study , the population is university hospital managers in Esfahan university. data is gathered through achieve questionnaire that supported by member of management faculty.The reliability is supported based on α koren bakh . for analysis of data use spss soft ware .
Results: Finding show that : Average number of ability factor is (87/5+12/2) , clarify factor (82/3+14/8), help factor (82/6+15/7) , incentive factor ( 81/4+ 15/4), evaluation factor (77/2+15/6) , validity factor (82/7+ 17/3),and environment factor is (85/2+12/8). and base on Pierson test (p<0/05) all of the factor are effective on staff performance.
Conclusion: Today the important problem in health care organization is staff effectiveness . in fact , performance improvement is the most step for organization improvement.


Mohammadreza Tavakkoli, Dr. Saeed Karimi, Dr. Marzieh Javadi, Dr. Alireza Jabbaria,
Volume 16, Issue 1 (4-2017)
Abstract

Background: In year 1995, new system administration plan of hospitals (fee for service) was notified. This scheme was implemented in hospitals for 20 years. In the early September 2104, new guidelines of performance-based fee for service plan with the aim of deficiencies in the previous plan was reviewed and implemented in hospitals in Isfahan. This study aimed at investigating reform strategies to improve monitoring performance and infrastructure implementation development of the new scheme of fee guidelines in 2014.

Materials and Methods: This study was a qualitative one based of phenomenology. Depth interviews were used to collect data. Eleven individuals assessed including top and middle managers and professors of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences using content analysis method.

Results: In this study, eight main themes and ten sub-themes extracted including appropriate policy making, health management reform in health system, cultural building in monitoring, proper planning, physicians' motivation, infrastructure improvement, improving training, informatics and constructive interactions between senior managers and hospitals' directors.

Conclusion: With the aim of rationalizing the health system, new instructions and fee for service plan should be considered well to tackle weak points. It seems that coping with these weak spots in new fee for service plan, has feasibility to provide more satisfaction among physicians and staff. To achieve main goal of the project which defined as patients and staff satisfaction, using new reform strategies to facilitate plan implementation, continuing observation and stronger mentoring recommended.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb