Search published articles


Showing 9 results for Standards

R Khodayari, S Tourani, A Qaderi, M Salehi, H Jafari,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (2-2011)
Abstract

Background: Medical tourism is an increasing industry that patients travel to abroad for receiving health care services. The countries which are successful in this industry have global accrediting quality. This research is aimed to access capabilities of selected hospitals in Iran University of Medical Sciences in attracting medical tourists according to JCI patient-oriented standards. 

Materials & Methods: This research is a descriptive, cross-sectional study that carried out in Hasheminejad, Rajaie and Motahhari hospitals. To collect data patient-oriented checklist of JCI standard used. Data analyzed by using descriptive statistic techniques.

Results: The results showed the high rates of consideration is related to medication  manage­­ment and standards used (84/5%), and anesthesia and surgical care standards (80%) that both of them are related to Hashemi­­nejad hospital and also patient and family rights standards (47/5%) are low rates of considerations that are related to Motahhari hospital. Generally, the mean rates of consideration in Hasheminejad (71/8%) are more than Rajaie hospital (67%) and these hospitals are more than Motahhari hospital (62/3%).

Conclusion: Generally, the selected hospitals had rather readiness and possible and appropriate capabilities in attracting medical tourists. Some standards (access to care and continuity of care, patient and family education, assessment of patients, anesthesia and surgical care) were appropriate and some of them were insufficient (patient and family rights, care of patients and patient and family education). According to identify strengths and weaknesses of the hospitals in medical tourism, they could use SWOT analytical model to increase their capabilities.


Ma Rezaei , F Ghahramani, Gh Sadravi,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract

Background: Medical diagnostic laboratories play an important role in diagnosis, treatment and prevention of the diseases. Today’s without assisting of the laboratories, conserving of public health and outbreaks prevention of infectious and genetic diseases is impossible. In this research the cases determined by the department of health and medical education questionnaire in quality control of public and private laboratories. Materials and Methods: This study is a cross sectional (descriptive and analytic) in which 20 private medical diagnostic laboratories and 16 training centers were selected. The quality control standards were reviewed and compared. Results: From 12 items of the questionnaire the two following items, rules and regulations in both private and public laboratories gained the highest priorities with 100% private and 93% governmental laboratories respectively. The lowest score was related to testing quality control of the laboratories with that of public and private ones, 82% and 75.7 percent respectively. In all that cases, governmental laboratories and training centers were rated lower than private labs. Conclusion: This study showed that both private and public laboratories’ score were under below of standards. Governmental laboratories were rated lower than private labs. In private laboratories, identifying errors and in the governmental laboratories, testing quality control should be considered
F Ebadi Fard Azar, A Choopani , H Saberi Anari , N Mohammadi, Sh Arkian , F Choopani ,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract

Background: The existed difference statistical indicators is necessary to measure the efficiency of the health organization and as an exact strategy, could be removed the developed problems in heath services sectors. Materials and methods: This is a descriptive research as a cross sectional study throughout obstetric and gynecology wards in the general hospital of RASOOL. The questionnaires and statistical Forms applied for data gathering. The methods were completed questionnaires, statistical Forms, face to face interviews and observation. The Delphi technique, standardized questionnaires and references’ text books used to determining the reliability and validity. Data analysis was done by using likret ranking. results: The results showed that some indicators, such as inpatient bed occupied rate (63%), bed turnover interval(5) & mean length of stay(4), patient per nurse(19), meanwhile service education(10),staff per active bed(1for 12), midwife per delivery bed(0), staff(50.9%) and patient satisfaction(89%) were lower than expected. Some indicators such as rooming in technique(100%), breast feeding(100%), patient information access from HIS system(100%), emergency and hostelling medicine access(100%), round and morning reports(100%), the mean admitted time in the ward(30 minutes), Infant and maternal mortality rate per total deliveries(0), and the percentage of trained patient(100%) were as expected. Some indicators such as expert physician per active bed (1 for 7) and C/S per total delivery ratio (69%) which was higher than expected, and the necessary data for calculating book & papers per assistant professor & non colonial infection rate were not found. Conclusion: Hospital indicators showed the performance of hospitals in the various bases. Therefore,the broad attentions to these indicators are necessary. Meanwhile, it should be compared them and to distinct time periods.
J Sadeq Tabrizi, F Gharibi,
Volume 11, Issue 2 (8-2012)
Abstract

Background: Accreditation is one of the evaluation systems which have numerous effects on the key indicators in health care system. To develop a suitable accreditation model, a best way could be the benchmark of the powerful and successful accreditation models in all over the world. By considering likely differences in the various countries health systems, this study aims to survey the compatibility of the best accreditation models and standards in Islamic Republic of Iran's health care system.
Materials & Methods: In this study, the expert's perspectives have been ascertained about standards of selected references accreditation models based on standards "importance" and "feasibility" using two rounds Delphi Technique. The experts selected among scientific and academic experts in the areas of accreditation and health services management. They were asked to fill up the Delphi questionnaire and send back it to the researchers in the designated time. Each standard scored in Likert scale from 1 to 9. Standards with mean score of ≤ 3 were rejected, standards with mean score between 4 and 6 send to the second round and standards with mean score ≥ 7 included in the national model.
Results: In the first round, 20 out of 27 questionnaires have been obtained from experts. After data analyses all the standards have been accepted except 31 with mean score between 4 and 6. Remained 31 standards with achieved mean scores in first round, send back to the study experts through the second round. In the second round, 17 out of 20 questionnaires collected and finally 18 standards were rejected.
Conclusion: According to the variety of standards, comprehensive categories and richness of necessary details of standards, the resulted model in this study could be a rich and suitable model for Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, using this model could empower evaluation system and improve the quality of health care system.


Seyed Hadi Hosseini , Siavash Fazelian , Javad Heshmati , Mahdi Sepidarkish , Reza Pakzad , Abolghasem Pourreza ,
Volume 14, Issue 2 (8-2015)
Abstract

Background: nutrition department is one of the most important sectors of hospital to improve the patients' health and satisfaction. Lack of standards obsevance causes nosocomial infections and develops health risks. Establishing HACCP standards, many existing shortcomings will be omitted in the hospital nutrition department. This study aimed at assessing the mentioned nutritional standards system in the hospital nutrition department.

Materials and Methods:  This cross - departmental study was conducted at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences' teaching hospitals in 2013. HACCP questionnaire was used. Data collection performed using observation, interviews and questionnaire filling in from hospitals' nutrition department.5-point likert scale used which rating scale was from 1(lowest) to 5(highest).in order to data entry and analysis SPSS software version 18 utilized using tables, graphs and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results:  The mean score and percentage of five areas of HACCP standards were 3.58 and 70.23% respectively which were desirable in seven studied hospitals. There was no significant statistical relation between the mean scores of hospitals in the standards.

Conclusion: Although, the situation was assessed desirable, because of the importance of nutrition department, observance of optimum standards and quality improvement can prevent potential infections in food preparation and distribution and result in patients and staff satisfaction.


Mr Hojat , , ,
Volume 14, Issue 4 (1-2016)
Abstract

Background: providing human resources is one of the most important factors to achieve the organization goals. Human resources are the most valuable aspect in production and service delivery. Staff shortages and excesses can be effective in reducing quality of services.This study aimed at assessing the hospitals' human resources condition from 2001 to 2014.

Materials and Methods: This review article extracted required information from ISI, Pubmed, Scopus, Wiley, Proquest, Emerald, Magiran, SID ,Iranmedex, Google, Google scholar and other related database considering keywords Human resource, Human resource management, Staff, Workforce, Hospital ,Iran, staff nursing, medical, physician personnel with Persian equation.  Searched Articles Search Based on article objectives analyzed step to step with arrangement with study title, abstract and full text.

Results: Findings revealed that the majority of hospitals faced to lack and inappropriate distribution of human resources especially in medicine and nursing but there was no shortage in logistic, financial, paramedics and allied professional human resources.

Conclusions: Correct and appropriate human resources management, planning due to compensated inadequate human resources and raising them to a standard level can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of hospital activities. 


Dr Abdolreza Shaghaghi, Hassan Mahmoodi, Hossein Shahriari,
Volume 17, Issue 3 (11-2018)
Abstract

Background: The Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) initiative emphasizes on changes in traditional hospitals’ approach in care provision. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence required for successful planning and implementation of the HPH in the country’s educational hospitals.
 
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, opinions of 300 frontline health professionals working in the ten educational hospitals affiliated to the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences were examined using validated tools in 2016. Descriptive data analysis procedures and logistic regression analysis (using Enter method) were applied by SPSS software version 22. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05.
 
Results: The mean scores and SD for applicability of the HPH standards were 66.06±17.51. Gender (OR=3.19 95%CI: 1.33- 8.40), occupation type (OR= 1.50 95% CI: 0.65- 0.70), hospital type (general vs. specialized) (OR= 1.59 95%CI: 1.10- 1.25), number of active beds (OR=3.84 95% CI: 1.56-9.42) and having prior knowledge about the HPH program (OR=2.81 95% CI: 1.31-4.80) were identified as significant predictors of the HPH standards’ feasibility in the studied hospitals.
 
Conclusion: Given that study findings, at least the baseline subjective inclination to adapt the HPH standards in the educational hospitals do not exist through the Iranian health care providers’ points of view. As the first step in progress towards preparation for implementing the HPH standards, planning of tailor-made educational programs for hospitals’ staff in Iran is recommended.
 
Beheshteh Jebelli, Mohammad Varahram, Mehdi Kazempour-Dizaji, Shirin Esmaeili, Habib Emami, Elham Ghazanchaei,
Volume 20, Issue 4 (12-2021)
Abstract

Introduction: After the increase in the incidence and global spread of Covid-19 virus, medical centers faced a number of problems and challenges following this crisis. In order to increase the quality and safety of medical services and their optimal management, both in critical and non-critical situations, health care providers in different countries of the world have used various methods that increase the organizational commitment to improve quality.
Method: This study is a cross-sectional analytical research. Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire based on 903 accreditation standards notified by the Ministry of Health by available sampling method from 326 employees of Masih Daneshvari Center in 2021. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22.
Results: The results showed that out of an average of 8 areas related to accreditation standards, participants in the areas of professional ethics and compliance with the recipient of services, infection control, environmental health and waste management mentioned the most compliance in the emergency situation caused by Covid-19 and areas of clinical management and patient safety were ranked next.
Discussion and conclusion: According to the participants, observing the areas of environmental health and waste, service recipients and infection control has been more practical during Corona pandemic. The principles of accreditation seem to be accepted as quality improvement standards and can be an effective guide in preparing medical centers for emergency conditions.


Mehran Lak, Farnaz Vosough, Kianoush Saberi, Shahnaz Sharifi, Hadi Pashapour,
Volume 22, Issue 4 (1-2024)
Abstract

Background and Purpose: Infections related to inadequate healthcare practices can have adverse effects on healthcare systems. This study aims to identify the gap between the current handwashing practices and standard levels by determining the frequency of handwashing among staff at Shahid Modares Hospital in Tehran.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the wards of Shahid Modares Hospital between 2018 and 2019. The tool comprised two parts: job information and hand hygiene practices at different times and specific actions. Observers directly monitored all staff in each shift using a headcount method. Each column represented the hand hygiene compliance score of a specific professional group, allowing simultaneous performance evaluation.
Results: Out of 640 observed instances, 202 involved the use of disinfectants, 255 involved handwashing, 111 involved glove use, and in 71 instances, hand hygiene was not observed. The highest compliance occurred when staff intended to contact the patient's body, while the lowest compliance was observed after performing surgery on the patient.
Conclusion: Given the significant role of nurses in therapeutic interventions, multifaceted training interventions, the drafting of hand hygiene policies, and increasing awareness among department officials should prioritize this group of employees. These measures aim to bring practices closer to desired standards and prevent unwanted consequences.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb