Showing 2 results for Thematic Analysis
Seyed Rahim Safavi Mirmahalleh, Mohammad Rahim Ramazanian, Mahmoud Moradi, Mostafa Ebrahimpour Azbari,
Volume 22, Issue 4 (1-2024)
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Health status is undeniably one of the most critical indicators of social development and progress. Providing healthcare poses a significant challenge for human life, and managing the healthcare supply chain is of strategic importance. The aim of this research is to analyze and compare the results of meta-synthesis with thematic analysis in identifying the risks of the pharmaceutical industry's supply chain.
Methods: This research follows a qualitative approach, utilizing both meta-synthesis and thematic analysis to identify supply chain risks in the pharmaceutical industry. In the first step, a meta-synthesis and systematic review of related studies over the past twenty-three years were conducted, identifying one hundred articles, which were refined to twenty-six key articles for the research. In the next step, risks specific to Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain were identified through thematic analysis and semi-structured interviews with experts, using targeted sampling. Finally, the results from these two approaches were compared and analyzed.
Results: The meta-synthesis approach identified ten general supply chain risks in the global pharmaceutical industry. Similarly, the thematic analysis approach identified ten specific supply chain risks in Iran's pharmaceutical industry. Six risks were common to both approaches: low quality of raw materials, complexity and incompatibility of information systems, supply of foreign currency and financial payments, transportation and insurance issues, increase in the price of raw materials, and unavailability of medicines. These common risks are critical for both the global and Iranian pharmaceutical supply chains.
Conclusion: Stakeholders in Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain (including hospitals) should prioritize managing these six common risks to improve supply chain performance. Additionally, they should focus on the four unique risks identified through thematic analysis specific to Iran's pharmaceutical supply chain, applying appropriate control measures and activities.
Fateme Tavallaei, Fattah Sharifzade, Reza Vaezi, Seyed Jalalodin Faraji,
Volume 24, Issue 1 (5-2025)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for 76% of mortality in Iran, where effective management hinges on community empowerment and integrated service delivery. Co-production, an innovative strategy involving shared power between service users and providers, is a promising approach for addressing the multifaceted needs of patients with chronic conditions. This study aimed to develop a context-sensitive framework for implementing and evaluating co-produced NCD management programs. We achieved this by integrating the core principles of co-production with a realist evaluation lens, drawing on the perspectives of senior healthcare managers.
Methods: Employing a qualitative methodology, this study conducted a thematic analysis of data derived from a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews. A cohort of 17 senior healthcare managers, selected via purposive sampling in 2025, participated as key informants.
Results: The analysis yielded a hierarchical thematic structure comprising 71 basic themes, 20 organizing themes, and 6 overarching global themes. These global themes, which form the core of the proposed framework, are: (1) Developing Participatory Clinical Processes, (2) Establishing Equity-Oriented Support Services, (3) Recognizing Diverse User Groups, (4) Enhancing Provider Capabilities, (5) Understanding User Responses, and (6) Fostering Mutual Benefits among Stakeholders. The dynamic interplay of these themes is crucial for operationalizing effective NCD co-production.
Conclusion: By innovatively integrating co-production principles with a realist evaluation framework, this study offers a context-sensitive model that clarifies theoretical concepts for practical application in NCD management. A key implication is the necessity for monitoring systems that track both clinical and well-being outcomes, supported by multi-level incentive structures. This research provides a foundational model for policymakers to develop, implement, and evaluate more effective and equitable co-produced healthcare programs. Further longitudinal research is recommended to assess long-term outcomes and incorporate patient perspectives.
