Journal of

---

Background: In the hospital setting, the potential for conflict is considerably high, because of the frequent and complicated interactions among nurses, physicians and other medical team staff and also the variety of their roles. With regards to the destructive conflict between physician and nurse which can negatively impact on the quality of health care delivery, this study aimed to investigate sources of conflict between physicians and nurses. Materials & Methods: The study population involved a total of physicians and nursing cadre employed in 4 hospitals affiliated to Ardebil University of Medical Sciences. 260 subjects were selected by both census and Simple random sampling methods. Data collection process was accomplished through questionnaire that its reliability and validity were confirmed. Data analysis was done using the Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Inequality in the social status between physicians and nurses from the perspective of patients and their attendants and also inequality in distribution of immaterial benefits between two forementioned groups (mean=3.23) were the most leading factors in arising conflict. The Social economic system (p<0.001), the health system (p=0.013), the hospital system (p<0.001) and interpersonal relations (p<0.001) variables had a significant relationship with the organizational position. Conclusion: creating appropriate social and cultural contexts in order to promote the social status of nursing profession as well as improving the organization and its management could be effective to prevent or at least mitigate conflict between physicians and nurses.

---

Introduction: In the present era, the implementation of open innovation process is necessary for any organization, and hospitals as the main medical centers are no exception. In fact, hospitals, as health operational units, are always directly exposed to changes in the field of health services. Therefore, the present study has investigated the factors affecting open innovation in public hospitals in Guilan province.
Methods: From the point of view of purpose, this research is an applied study and in terms of data collection, it is in the category of descriptive research, which was conducted cross-sectionally in 1400. The statistical population of the study was 1600 senior managers and staff of public hospitals in Guilan province. For sampling, a non-randomized judgmental sampling method was used to access community members (senior managers and employees with at least a bachelor's degree). 250 questionnaires were used to perform the test. Data collection tools are standard questionnaires. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha, and the validity of the questionnaires was confirmed through the face and content validity, convergent and divergent validity. The structural equation modeling method has been used to test the research hypotheses. The software used in this research is SPSS 26 and Smart PLS3.
Results: The results of the structural equation modeling test showed that among the external factors, cooperation with partners and the user, among the internal organizational factors, organizational structure, exploratory learning, and organizational culture, and finally among the individual internal factors, organizational motivation affects the open innovation of public hospitals in Guilan province. The impact of trust between partners, technology, personality traits, and knowledge on hospital open innovation has been rejected.
Conclusion: In collaboration with other health care services, universities, and users, hospitals should develop appropriate policies to transition from a closed innovation system to open innovation, and support effective measures in this regard.

---

Background and purpose: In response to evolving external environments, organizations must renew their valuable resources to sustain competitive advantage. Dynamic capabilities empower organizations to effectively navigate these continual changes. Essentially, dynamic capabilities foster a stable behavioral orientation within organizations, facilitating integration, reformulation, renewal, and reconstruction of resources and capabilities, particularly enhancing and revitalizing core capabilities in response to dynamic environments to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. This study explores the influence of dynamic capabilities on constructive collaboration and supply chain performance within healthcare centers. Dynamic capabilities are categorized into four perspectives: sensitivity, learning, coordination, and integration. Constructive collaboration serves as a mediating variable, while technological orientation acts as a moderating variable in the model.
Methods: This study adopts an applied purpose and descriptive-survey method. The statistical population comprises employees at Ayatollah Taleghani Gonbadkavus Hospital. Using a questionnaire adapted from Mandal's (2022) study, the research establishes relationships between variables, categorized as descriptive-analytical. The questionnaire's validity was assessed using convergence and divergence methods, and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. Data analysis employed structural equation modeling and Smart-PLS software.
Results: Data analysis reveals a significant relationship between the learning, coordination, and integration perspectives of the hospital and constructive collaboration. However, no significant relationship is observed between the sensitivity perspective and constructive collaboration, nor between constructive collaboration and the performance of the healthcare system's supply chain. A significant relationship exists, and technological orientation does not moderate the relationship between the sensitivity perspective and learning with constructive collaboration, but it moderates the relationship between the coordination and integration perspective with constructive collaboration.
Conclusion: Improvements in collaborative efforts across various hospital departments, decreased risks of medical errors, enhanced service quality, and elevated professional status of staff are among the outcomes of assessing the performance of hospitals' sustainable supply chains.