Journal of

---

Abstract: Background: Today one of the main problems low or middle income families face is financing healthcare costs. This article studies the methods of of financing health care costs among hospitalized diabetic patients in different types of insurances. Materials & Methods: This is a causal-comparative study. The variables consist of comparative (health care costs) and categorical(different insurance types including: Iran health insurance , social security and others) variables. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect needed data . The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA , Duncan`s statistical test test of Danken and T-test. Results: The results indicated a significant statistical differences between all types of insurance assessed by cost variables. Also the significant differences between patient`s out of pocket expenses ratio of direct costs (p<0.01،F=19.37) and their ratio of total costs (F=25.36, p<0.01) were detected in three types of insurances . Patient`s out of pocket of total cost was 59.55%, 50.34% and 32% in Iran health insurance, social security and other types respectively. Conclusion: In spite of all invested deal of efforts to improve health indices and health care services availability ,health care system is still faces main challenges of providing financial resources and protecting against financial burden on families . Developing a public health insurance and improving health insurance coverage would be helpful for providing financial resources of health care system.

---

Background: One of the main goals of health sector evolution plan is reducing the amount of out of pocket payment by patients receiving hospital services in public sectors. This study aimed to assess the amount of out of pocket payment by inpatients in public hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science in Tehran city in 2015.
 
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 405 discharged patients from four public and teaching hospitals were selected using convenient sampling method. Data were collected using a researcher made checklist and investigating the hospital bills. In order to data analysis, descriptive statistics and regression analysis were utilized through SPSS Software version16.
 
Results:  The amount of out of pocket payment was 10.2 percent included 9.9 percent formal payment, 0.2 percent bought & brought goods and 0.1 percent informal payment. The most portion of the hospital costs was related to medical supplies and pharmaceuticals, surgeries services and hosteling with 32.6, 20.6 and 17.36, respectively. Type of hospital, having surgery, average length of stay, family size and gender had significant effect on the out of pocket payment amount (p ≤ 0.05).
 
Conclusion: The amount of out of pocket payment by inpatient in public hospitals was in accordance with goal of the health sector evolution plan, which reveals the appropriate government support. It is recommended to tailor and implement enormous plans regarding outpatients and private sector in national level to attain sustained reduction in out of pocket payment.

---

Background: Hospital, as the largest and most important health system unit, has the highest costs. Governments cannot finance all of the costs of this sector, so reforms are inevitable. In this regard, researchers have explained the underlying factors in financing policy and its commanding.
Materials & Methods: This study is a descriptive study done by qualitatively and quantitatively method in 2019. The statistical population included experts from the health sector, the capital market, and the Social Security Organization. A purposive sampling method was used. Data collection tools were receipts and a semi-structured questionnaire for interviews. MAXQDA 11 software was used to analyze the interviews, and the Delphi technique was used for validation. Walt Gilson and Kingdon models were used for policy analysis and commanding.
 Results: Underlying factors in policy-making and commanding the financing of hospitals from the capital market are macro-factors (governance and legal, political, social, and economic factors) and micro-factors (stewardship, financing, and technical factors). The financing problem stream of hospitals, the policy flow that includes public-private partnership models, and the political flow that began with sanctions open a window of opportunity to finance hospitals through the capital market.
 Conclusion: Upstream documents and development plans allow the privatization of governmental organizations; therefore, in addition to government budgets and dedicated revenues, hospitals can use private-sector financing strategies. In the meantime, easy and inexpensive financing, transparency, and accountability are the capital market characteristics that introduce it as an appropriate strategy. 

---

Background and purpose: One of the health system reform programs is the Family Physician and Referral System Program. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review how family physicians and referral systems are financed in selected countries and Iran.
Methods: This study was conducted as a comparative review in 1403. Information was extracted using related keywords and their English equivalents based on specific subject headings (Mesh) in various databases. In addition, data from the World Health Organization and health system reports of selected countries were also reviewed. Information was extracted based on a data extraction form (researcher-made). Finally, the information was categorized and analyzed by subject.
Results: The study results showed that the main source of financial resources was through the budget and public taxes, and the payment system in the family physician program in the majority of the countries studied was based on performance-based per capita payments. Finally, in addition to the weaknesses and challenges of the countries studied in implementing The family physician program, in Iran, lack of public awareness, poor supervision and management, incorrect policymaking, and challenges in implementing electronic health records were also identified as weaknesses of the family physician program.
Conclusion: Despite the many similarities in the implementation of the family physician program among the selected countries, there are differences in terms of policymaking, implementation methods, and funding methods. Based on the research findings, it is suggested that in order to successfully implement the family physician program, the successful experiences of other countries at the international level, as well as evidence and information in implementing this program, be used.