Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: Mental health in the workplace is a critical factor influencing both employee well-being and organizational productivity. However, issues such as stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout can significantly impair job performance and overall quality of life. While numerous tools have been developed to assess mental health, many are not specifically designed or updated for work environments. As the complexity of the workplace continues to increase, accurate identification and evaluation of these conditions become increasingly essential. This study aims to review available tools and identify the most proper methods for screening and assessing mental health issues in the workplace.
Material and method:  A scoping review approach was used to identify mental health assessment tools applicable to workplace settings. The PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched using keywords related to mental health at work. Studies published after 2020 were included, focusing on tools developed and validated in work environments. Two authors independently extracted and reviewed data from selected studies. Tools were categorized based on their aims and specific characteristics.
Results: After screening, 12 studies were selected from a primary set of 746 papers.. The extracted tools were designed to assess stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout. While most tools were developed for general settings or the public, some were appropriated to specific occupational groups, such as military personnel and healthcare workers. Burnout assessment tools were the most frequently referenced category.
Conclusion: Newer tools, such as the Work Stress Screener, Occupational Depression Inventory, and Burnout Assessment Tool, offer potential advantages over older instruments. Shorter, specialized tools are recommended to assess job anxiety effectively. Organizations should prioritize selecting tools that align with their employees' specific working conditions to promote mental health and productivity.

---

Introduction: Computer-based systems have become integral to every aspect of daily life, with the successful performance of such systems heavily reliant on error-free software. Given the significance of these systems, tools are essential for evaluating their usability. One such tool is the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The present study aimed to localize and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the third edition of the PSSUQ and assess the usability of the library website at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.
Material and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study employed the Backward-Forward method for translating the questionnaire. The study population included 314 participants for cultural adaptation of the scale and 147 postgraduate students for evaluating the library website, all from Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Reliability was determined via Cronbach’s alpha, and exploratory factor analysis was performed. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 16, adhering to ethical guidelines at all stages of the study.
Results: The overall content validity index (CVI) of the questionnaire was 0.96, while the overall content validity ratio (CVR) was satisfactory, with clarity and simplicity both scoring 0.91 and necessity at 0.75. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.95, with correlations between items exceeding 0.30. No significant differences in the usability of the library website were observed based on age, gender, field of study, educational level, or year of admission.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the third edition of the PSSUQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating system usability and user satisfaction with digital systems. It holds substantial potential for identifying system weaknesses and areas requiring improvement.