Showing 5 results for Mohammadian
Athena Rafieepour, Parvin Nasiri, Omid Giahi, Mohammad Reza Monazzam Esmaeilpour, Abolfazl Zakerian, Farough Mohammadian,
Volume 7, Issue 4 (12-2017)
Abstract
Introduction: Exposure to vibration as one of the consequences of industrial noise or the use of vibration generators can cause discomfort, reduce the efficiency and level of safety in workplaces. Therefore, in this study, the effect of whole body vibration on individual’s mental performance and response time was investigated.
Material and Method: In this study, 40 male students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected randomly and divided into two 20 subjects groups. Each group participated in two Pegboard Board and Math Calculations tests. Subjects in each stage of test were exposed to whole body vibration with acceleration in 0.8 and 1.1 m/s2 as well as background mode without vibration and were investigated response time and mental performance.
Result: In the present study, the mean response time to the manual Purdue Pegboard test in the vibrational acceleration of 0.0, 0.8 and 1.1 m/s2 with a decreasing trend was 197.55 ± 2.7, 176.25 ± 5.38 and 177.58 ± 2.92, respectively, which results in a significant reduction in the accuracy of the test. Also, the results showed that whole body vibration does not affect mental performance in shallow levels. But, in the intermediate and deep levels, this difference is statistically significant (p <0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the results, whole body vibration is an effective factor in individual’s response time and mental performance, which can lead to a reduction in the accuracy of the work.
Esmaeil Karami, Mohammadreza Monazzam, Keykaous Azrah, Mehdi Mohammadian, Zahra Goodarzi,
Volume 12, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Abstract
Introduction: Over recent years, various programs have been conducted to reduce noise, indicating the increasing concerns of society over noise pollution. This study has been performed to enhance the performance of parallel barriers on two sides of a highway considering the surrounding buildings.
Material and Methods: The 2D boundary element simulation method was employed to predict the noise reduction in barriers. Regarding the effect of buildings and water canals, various kinds of models were investigated to compare the effectiveness of different boundary barriers in real conditions from a listener’s perspective.
Results: The use of a single YA model could improve the performance of parallel barriers by 3.5 dB compared to that of a TS model. Moreover, by using a pair of barriers, no significant change was observed in the performance of the second barrier. However, by using parallel barriers along the surrounding buildings, the TD model improved the efficiency by 3 dB compared to the TS model. The rise in the frequency resulted in remarkable adverse effects on the barrier performance, such that the surrounding buildings at a distance of 8 m had a negative effect on the performance of the parallel barriers by almost 8.34 dB.
Conclusion: In general, by ignoring the buildings, the use of a pair of TZ barriers showed a higher performance. Meanwhile, by considering the buildings in the design model, the TD model was found to be optimum. Therefore, it can be concluded that choosing an ideal barrier only based on the noise behind it cannot indicate its behavioral and acoustic characteristics in a real environment.
Farough Mohammadian, Mohsen Fallahati, Milad Abbasi, Mojtaba Zokaei,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (9-2023)
Abstract
Introduction: Many industries have multiple factors harmful to health, leading to simultaneous exposure of these factors to each other. Noise is one of the most common physical parameters in the work environment. On the other hand, heat is also increasing due to various energy processes in industries. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of determining changes in physiological parameters and visual-auditory attention in acute exposure to heat and noise.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, 72 individuals (36 men and 36 women) aged between 23 and 33 years participated according to the inclusion criteria. In total, 12 different test modes were performed (3 temperature levels and 4 noise pressure levels). The test was conducted for each person in 4 steps during a specific day. The duration of exposure to each condition was half an hour, and a half-hour rest was given between each test condition. Saliva samples of each subject were collected before and immediately after exposure to noise and heat. Also, The Integrated Visual and Auditory (IVA) was recorded by the participants simultaneously.
Results: The results of combined exposure to noise and heat on visual and auditory attention showed that only two modes of combined exposure, SPL95+WBGT34 and SPL95+WBGT29, caused a significant increase (P < 0.05) in mental workload and a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in visual and auditory attention. In addition, the results showed that independent exposure to noise at the levels of 85 and 95 dB and exposure to heat at higher temperature levels of 34 and 29 degrees Celsius cause a significant increase (P < 0.05) in salivary cortisol after exposure. The results of the effect of combined exposure to noise and heat on salivary cortisol showed that three experimental modes of combined exposure (SPL85+WBGT34, SPL95+WBGT29, and SPL95+WBGT34) caused a noticeable and significant (P<0.001) increase in salivary cortisol.
Conclusion: Indeed, salivary cortisol can be recommended as a physiological index to evaluate noise and heat exposure. It’s also noteworthy that salivary cortisol is more affected by noise and heat exposure than cognitive performance.
Yalda Torabi, Neda Gilani, Yousef Mohammadian, Ali Esmaeili,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Introduction: Acceptance of Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) rules plays a crucial role in determining the performance of employees in HSE-related areas at the workplace. This study aimed to design a questionnaire to investigate influential factors on acceptance of HSE rules among employees.
Material and Methods: The face validity of the survey was assessed by ten individuals from the target population, while content validity was evaluated by ten HSE experts using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The impact scores were calculated for the quantitative assessment of face validity, and the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) values were used to assess content validity. Construct validity was determined through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) involving 506 participants. The reliability of the survey was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Results: All items in the survey showed satisfactory levels of impact score (>1.5), CVR (>0.69), and CVI (>0.79). The mean values for the Impact score, CVI, CVR, and S-CVI-UA were 4.26, 0.963, 0.944, and 0.62, respectively. The survey and its dimensions demonstrated strong reliability, as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha and ICC values exceeding 0.70. Additionally, EFA successfully identified the structure of the questionnaire, and CFA confirmed its goodness of fit.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability. This instrument can be effectively used to assess the factors that influence the acceptance of HSE rules among employees in various workplace settings.
Parisa Farahmandian, Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdolmajid Fadaei, Ramezan Sadeghi,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world. Smoking occupational and environmental exposures are the most important causes of lung cancer. Cadmium is known as a human carcinogen due to its ability to increase lung cancer risk. This study estimates the general results of all studies on the relationship between cadmium and lung cancer.
Material and Methods: In the present study, studies that evaluated the relationship between cadmium and lung cancer until May 2022 were searched and retrieved. From the funnel plot to determine the existence of diffusion skew, from the statistical tests Chi-squared test (x2) and I2 to determine heterogeneity, from the meta-regression method to identify the root of heterogeneity, and from the sensitivity analysis approach to identify the effect of each study on the result, it was generally used. This study performed all analyses with Stata statistical software version 15.
Results: In this study, it was observed that the chance of developing lung cancer compared to the base group, in the people exposed to a higher dose than the base level of cadmium is equal to 1.31 (95% CI: 1.06-1.62; p-value = 0.024), which is statistically significant. Based on Egger’s test (p-value = 0.178) and Begg’s (p-value = 0.276), no diffusion bias was observed in this study.
Conclusion: ccording to the final results of this review research, exposure to cadmium leads to a 31% increase in lung cancer risk, which is statistically significant. Therefore, cadmium is a risk factor for lung cancer.
