Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: Heat stress is one of the Hazardous physical agents in the workplace, which can cause impairment of cognitive performance. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of different levels of heat stress on attention and reaction time in a laboratory condition.

Material and Method: This experimental study was done among 33 students included 17 males and 16 females. Mean age of the participants was 22.1(SD=2.3). Attention and reaction time parameters were evaluated using the continuous performance test and  reaction time measurement device respectivlely, after exposure to different heat levels (22°C and 37°C). Data were analyzed using ANOVA test and SPSS 20 software.  

Result: The results of tests attention and reaction time showed that the average of attention percentage was decreased and the average of reaction time increased by increasing the heat level, with a  statistical differences of  (P˂0.001) in both cases. Attention percent in terms of exposure to 22°C temperature was significantly higher than 37°C (P˂0.001). But, reaction time was significantly higher than with the exposure to 37°C temperature than 22°C (P˂0.001).

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that, heat by increasing reaction time and decreasing attention leading to an impairment  in the individual’s cognitive performances. Therefore, in jobs such as control rooms and various industries that need attention, concentration and quick reaction, it is necessary to consider and optimize the heat conditions in order to increase the level of attention and decrease of reaction time.

---

Introduction: Risk identification and investigation is an appropriate and practical approach for the occupational health professionals. This paper aims to determine exposure to the gases and metal fumes and to perform risk analysis in three common types of welding activities in a shipbuilding industry.
Material and method: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in a shipbuilding industry and three types of welding were considered including SMAW, MIG and MAG welding. Sampling of Mn and Cr fumes was carried out using NIOSH 7300 standard method, and NIOSH 6014 method NO2 sampling, and also direct reading devices for CO and O3 gases. Moreover, SQCRA risk assessment method was adopted to specify the level of exposure risk.
Results: The results of risk analysis showed that among gas pollutants, O3 and NO2 in all welding processes had a very high-risk level, while among the metal pollutants; Mn metal showed a high and very high risk level in MIG and SMAW welding.
Conclusion: According to the both sampling results and risk analysis, MIG process welders are more dangerous position than other types of welding.