Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: Covid-19 pandemic has imposed a significant effect on mental health of the health care workers. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining the pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression among Iranian health care workers during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Material and Methods: To conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline (PubMed), Embase, SID, Magiran databases and Google Scholar search engine were investigated to find studies over the prevalence of anxiety and depression among health care workers during the Covid-19 pandemic from December 2019 to June 10, 2021. Quality of the primary studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool and the random effects model was applied to estimate the pooled prevalence. Furthermore, χ2 test and I2 index were used to evaluate the degree of heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression in different subgroups was reported based on the severity of anxiety and depression, assessment tools, and staff jobs.
Results: Of 488 articles obtained as a result of the initial search, 10 related studies were identified and entered into the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 42% (95% CI: 25-75) and the pooled prevalence of depression was 35% (95% CI: 19-55). The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 54% (95% CI: 39-70) in the occupational group of nurses and 29% (95% CI: 17-44) among all health care workers. The pooled prevalence of depression was 46% (95% CI: 30 to 63) and 17% (95% CI: 10 to 26) among nurses and all health workers, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the findings, a high prevalence of anxiety and depression was observed among the health care workers of Iran during the Covid-19 epidemic. The authorities are required to plan for preventive and therapeutic interventions to reduce the psychological burden of the epidemic.

---

Introduction: Occupational noise is considered as an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Although previous studies have mainly examined the auditory outcomes of noise exposure and estimated the relative risk of diabetes, there is insufficient evidence to estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Workers exposed to occupational noise. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes in workers exposed to occupational noise.
Material and Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Web of Science, Scopus, Medline (PubMed) databases and Google Scholar engine were searched up to May 2025. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The pooled prevalence was estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² index. The pooled prevalence was reported in subgroups based on the method of diabetes diagnosis and type of study.
Results: Out of 1,193 initially identified studies, 14 studies with a total of 94,975 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes among individuals exposed to occupational noise was estimated at 5.91% (95% CI: 4.85%–6.98%). Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed among studies (I² = 98%, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis indicated that the prevalence of diabetes in studies based on clinical or paraclinical diagnostics was higher than in studies based on self-report (7.31% and 3.73%, respectively). Moreover, the prevalence of diabetes in cross-sectional studies was higher than in cohort studies (6.45% and 5.67%, respectively).
Conclusion: The findings indicated a moderate prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to occupational noise. This prevalence was based on preliminary studies with an acceptable level of quality. The findings highlight the importance of recognizing metabolic consequences of occupational noise exposure alongside its well-known auditory effects.