Showing 2 results for Rezaei-Hachesu
Vida Rezaei-Hachesu, Hassan Haddadzade Niri, Saeid Farahani, Mohammad Reza Monazzam Esmaeelpour,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (6-2023)
Abstract
Introduction: Colored noises with acoustic and psychoacoustic characteristics have several biological effects on human or animal health. While studies on auditory effects focus on noise’s physical aspects, its psychoacoustic aspects can also result in health and safety risks. Therefore, this study aims to investigate frequency-based damages due to exposure to colored noise in an animal model.
Material and Methods: Twenty-four male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups (6 in each group). The groups included the control (no exposure) and three exposure groups (white, pink, and violet). The rats were exposed to 110 dB SPL for 4 hr/day for 14 consecutive days. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) with click and tone-burst stimuli were recorded one day before (baseline), 7, and 14 days after exposure. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA.
Results: There was a statistically significant increase in ABR threshold values in exposure groups (p<0.05). Hearing threshold shifts in the white noise group showed a homogeneous pattern, violet noise showed an increasing pattern, and pink noise showed a decreasing pattern in low frequencies and a homogeneous pattern with increasing frequency. The highest shift in hearing threshold was observed in exposure groups from day 0 to 14. Additionally, the shift in hearing threshold in the second week was less than in the first one.
Conclusion: The current study observed that noise’s power spectral density affected hair cells’ damage severity. Accordingly, pink noise causes less damage to the cochlea compared to white and violet. Over time after noise exposure, cochlear pathogenesis gradually decreases and hair cell lesions become stable.
Vida Rezaei-Hachesu, Ali Jafari, Shadi Naderyan Fe’li,
Volume 15, Issue 4 (12-2025)
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational noise is considered as an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Although previous studies have mainly examined the auditory outcomes of noise exposure and estimated the relative risk of diabetes, there is insufficient evidence to estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Workers exposed to occupational noise. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes in workers exposed to occupational noise.
Material and Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Web of Science, Scopus, Medline (PubMed) databases and Google Scholar engine were searched up to May 2025. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The pooled prevalence was estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² index. The pooled prevalence was reported in subgroups based on the method of diabetes diagnosis and type of study.
Results: Out of 1,193 initially identified studies, 14 studies with a total of 94,975 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes among individuals exposed to occupational noise was estimated at 5.91% (95% CI: 4.85%–6.98%). Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed among studies (I² = 98%, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis indicated that the prevalence of diabetes in studies based on clinical or paraclinical diagnostics was higher than in studies based on self-report (7.31% and 3.73%, respectively). Moreover, the prevalence of diabetes in cross-sectional studies was higher than in cohort studies (6.45% and 5.67%, respectively).
Conclusion: The findings indicated a moderate prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to occupational noise. This prevalence was based on preliminary studies with an acceptable level of quality. The findings highlight the importance of recognizing metabolic consequences of occupational noise exposure alongside its well-known auditory effects.
