Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: In all societies, tools and equipment are generally designed for right-handed people, who make up approximately 90% of the population, but left-handed and ambidextrous people (those who use both hands in manual activities) also live among us. Even in delicate and sensitive jobs. This research investigated the relationship between the spectral effect of the dominant hand and grip strength and hand dexterity.
Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to measure the power and precision grip of 182 adult participants (56% female and 44% male). The dominant hand of the participants was determined using the Edinburgh Dominant Hand Questionnaire. Power grip strength was measured using the Constant 14192-709E. Pinch grip test was performed using Saehan Hydraulic Pinch Gauge SH5005 for both hands separately. Dexterity of both hands was also measured using the Pegboard 32020A tool.
Results: Power and precision grips were more common in men than in women (P<0.001). Power grip differed between right- and left-handed women (P=0.019), with right-handed women having greater grip strength. The Precision grip of left-handed men was significantly (P<0.001) greater than that of right-handed men. Hand dexterity of left-handed men was significantly (P<0.001) higher than that of right-handed men. Two-handed agility (P<0.001) and assembly dexterity (P<0.001) are significantly higher in ambidextrous people than in right- and left-handed people.
Conclusion: The power, precision grip and dexterity are different between women and men. The grip strength of men is stronger than that of women. Ambidextrous people have more dexterity and assembly agility, so in jobs that require the use of two hands, they perform better and will be recommended for employment in this category of jobs. 

---

Introduction: Surgical technologists encounter a challenging work environment, and therefore, they require well-organized workplaces and appropriate health-related training. This study aimed to determine the effect of a participatory ergonomics program on musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and general health among surgical technologists
Material and Methods: This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2023-2024 in operating rooms of teaching hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. The study population comprised 88 surgical technologists meeting the inclusion criteria. One hospital was randomly selected as the intervention site, while the remaining hospitals served as the control group. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), and the 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Initially, all participants in both groups completed baseline assessments. The intervention group received a participatory ergonomics program. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3 and 6 months post-intervention in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 employing both descriptive and inferential statistical methods, with a significance level set at 0.05.
Results: Before the intervention, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups in terms of mean scores for general health and MSDs (p=0.55). Three months post-intervention, a significant difference was found in the mean score of lower extremity MSDs between the groups (p=0.033). Six months post-intervention, a significant difference was observed in the mean score of Trunk region MSDs between the groups (p=0.038). Significant differences in mean general health scores were observed between the groups at 3 months (p=0.001) and 6 months (p=0.001) post-intervention, with the intervention group reporting better general health compared to the control group.
Conclusion: The implementation of a participatory ergonomics program can improve general health and reduce MSDs among surgical technologists.