Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are prevalent in work settings and are associated with high rate of prevalence and costs. Musculoskeletal conditions have multifaceted nature, and occupational factors play an important role in their development. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the working population in Iran during 2000 to 2015.
Material and Methods: Using the appropriate search terms, articles published in the journals, student thesis, and those presented at the conferences were searched through authentic English databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed) and Farsi ones (Magiran, SID, IranMedex, Irandoc). Following removal of duplicate citations and irrelevant studies, the full texts of the remaining publications were prepared and assessed for more detail.
Results: Perceived discomfort in low back region obtained the highest score in workers of industrial, administrative, service, and agricultural settings. However, in the handicraft and educational groups, the highest percentage of discomfort was belonged to neck (66.7%). Findings showed that the most commonly used techniques for evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders and risk factors were, respectively, Nordic questionnaire (NMQ) (76%) and REBA (13.9%). Moreover, all identified risk factors were classified into eleven groups including: biomechanical, work environment design, tools, equipment, temporal aspects of job design, job content, organizational aspects, economic and financial issues, social aspects, individual characteristics, and training.
Conclusion: Overall, a wide range of risk factors reported in the previous studies were categorized in the present review. The results are suggested to be considered by managers and decision makers as a framework to take measures for controlling musculoskeletal disorders to accomplish the goal of ergonomics, which is productivity and well-being.

---

Introduction: Usability has been defined as the extent to which specific users can efficiently use a product to achieve specific goals. Along with the increased number of the elderly population, there is a need for user-centered products for this group of people. Smartphones are widely used products in modern society. USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) questionnaire is an easy-to-use, quick, and accurate instrument to assess product/service usability. Thus, this study was done to determine the validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the USE questionnaire to evaluate the usability of smartphones for elderly users.
Material and Methods: The USE questionnaire was developed by Lund (2001) to assess usability, considering four separate dimensions: usefulness, satisfaction, ease of use, and ease of learning. This is a 30-item questionnaire that evaluates usability on a 7-point Likert scale. In order to assess the face and content validity of the questionnaire, a panel of nine experts was asked to rate the relevancy, clarity, simplicity, and necessity of each question using the Likert scale. Subsequently, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were computed. In order to confirm the reliability of the questionnaire, two methods of internal reliability and test-retest reliability were used. In this sense, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as the measure of internal reliability. Cronbach’s alpha equal to and above 0.7 was considered the minimum acceptable value. To measure the test-retest, 50 old adults (aged 60 years old and above) were asked to answer the questionnaire twice at a two-week interval. Then, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the two sets of scores. Also, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized for specifying its sensitivity, specificity, and cut -off point
Results: Based on the comments of the expert panel, CVI scores of all questionnaire items were above 0.78, whereas four items rated less than 0.78 in terms of CVR scores; and, consequently, were removed from the questionnaire. Moreover, according to the reliability assessment results, both internal correlation and test-retest scores obtained acceptable values. Specifically, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for usefulness, satisfaction, ease of use, and ease of learning were 0.771, 0.862, 0.756, and 0.798, respectively. In the ROC curve, the cut-off point was reported as 4.88 with the sensitivity and specificity of 97.8% and 75%, respectively, and area under the ROC curve at this cut-off point was obtained 81%.
Conclusion: Comparing a product’s characteristics with standards is a prerequisite to determining the level of usability of that product. The Farsi version of the USE questionnaire is a reliable tool for measuring usability with satisfactory validity and reliability. This questionnaire can be used in future studies in smartphone usability.