Journal of Health and Safety at Work

---

Introduction: Manual dexterity impairment due to wearing latex and nitrile gloves among health care employees and laboratory personnel can be a remarkable problem because of its adverse outcomes. The present study was conducted to “compare the effect of using latex and nitrile laboratory gloves on hand dexterity”.

.

Material and Method: In a semi experimental study design, 30 university were students randomly selected from Urmia University of medical sciences. Subjects assigned in three experimental conditions, such as the control condition (without gloves), with latex glove and with nitrile gloves. Then, dexterity level of fine finger and gross of the subjects were calculated using the Purdue pegboard test. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA test and T-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis.

.

Results: The result showed that the differences between three groups of laboratory conditions from the level of gross and fine finger dexterity were statistically significant (p‹0.05). As the latex gloves showed significant and positive effect on gross and fine finger dexterity comparable with nitrile gloves and control group but there was no significant difference between the gross and fine finger dexterity of nitrile gloves when comparing with the control group. In other words, the nitrile gloves had not negative effect on gross and fine finger dexterity.

.

Conclusion: Considering that there was no significant difference in the score of both fine finger and gross hand dexterity while using nitrile gloves as compared to the control condition (without gloves), means that use of nitrile gloves has no adverse effect on hand dexterity therefore, using nitrile gloves is recommended as a alternative for the latex gloves, considering the additional advantage of no allergic reaction in this gloves.

---

Introduction: In all societies, tools and equipment are generally designed for right-handed people, who make up approximately 90% of the population, but left-handed and ambidextrous people (those who use both hands in manual activities) also live among us. Even in delicate and sensitive jobs. This research investigated the relationship between the spectral effect of the dominant hand and grip strength and hand dexterity.
Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to measure the power and precision grip of 182 adult participants (56% female and 44% male). The dominant hand of the participants was determined using the Edinburgh Dominant Hand Questionnaire. Power grip strength was measured using the Constant 14192-709E. Pinch grip test was performed using Saehan Hydraulic Pinch Gauge SH5005 for both hands separately. Dexterity of both hands was also measured using the Pegboard 32020A tool.
Results: Power and precision grips were more common in men than in women (P<0.001). Power grip differed between right- and left-handed women (P=0.019), with right-handed women having greater grip strength. The Precision grip of left-handed men was significantly (P<0.001) greater than that of right-handed men. Hand dexterity of left-handed men was significantly (P<0.001) higher than that of right-handed men. Two-handed agility (P<0.001) and assembly dexterity (P<0.001) are significantly higher in ambidextrous people than in right- and left-handed people.
Conclusion: The power, precision grip and dexterity are different between women and men. The grip strength of men is stronger than that of women. Ambidextrous people have more dexterity and assembly agility, so in jobs that require the use of two hands, they perform better and will be recommended for employment in this category of jobs.