[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Registration :: Submission :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Contact :: Search ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Indexing & Abstracting::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations891303
h-index189
i10-index318
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Kocheili

Saeid Izadkhah, Nasin Naseri, Nader Maarufi, Yashar Kocheili, Hashem Shabedin,
Volume 9, Issue 5 (1-2016)
Abstract

Background and Aim:: Muscular shortness is one of the most common musculoskeletal impairments. It may occur as a result of trauma or even a sedentary life style and cause clinical symptoms. Hamstring muscle, due to its functional roles, is prone to injuries during physical activities. Research has shown that decreased hamstring muscle flexibility may lead to lower extremity injury. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of myofascial release (MFR) and muscle energy technique (MET) effects on hamstring muscle flexibility. 

Materials and Methods: Twenty four non-athlete healthy subjects (means ± SD= 26/12 ± 5.4 Years) were randomly assigned to two groups; myofascial release group and muscle energy technique group. Passive range of motion (ROM) of knee extension was measured using a digital goniometer before and immediately after the intervention.

Results: There was a significant increase in the knee passive range of motion immediately after both interventions (in MFR group p=0.000 and in MET Group p=0.000).The amount of knee extension increase was greater in myofascial release group (p=0.023).

Conclusion: Both MFR and MET can increase hamstring muscle flexibility; however, in this study MFR has shown to be more effective than MET.

Keywords: Flexibility, Muscle energy technique,  Myofascial release technique,  Hamstring muscle


Yashar Kocheili, Ali Ashraf Jamshidi, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, N Maarufi, Hossein Bagheri, Arezo Sedigh, Paria Jamshidian,
Volume 9, Issue 6 (3-2016)
Abstract

Background and Aim: ACL injury is one of the most common sport injuries which undergo reconstructive surgery. Electromyography or recording of muscles’ electrical activity is a suitable means to assess changes in motor control system output. The goal of this study is to compare the lower limb muscles EMG activity during drop landing in individuals after ACL reconstruction and healthy subjects.

Materials and Methods: Eleven men who had undergone ACL reconstruction 6 to 24 months ago (Age 29±6 years old) and 11 healthy men (Age 28±2 years old) participated in the study. Amount of electrical activity for tibialis anterior, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus and biceps femoris muscles was recorded using surface electrodes during drop landing and calculated for two time intervals. The amount of activity was measured in -150 to +50 and +50 to +180 intervals in relation to the landing moment. Subjective IKDC questionnaire and cross-over hop functional test were used to determine the subjective and objective functional level.  Independent t test was used to determine between-group statistical differences.

Results: Feed forward activity of semitendinosus (P=.041) and biceps femoris (P=.008) muscles were significantly higher in ACLR group and feedback activity of vastus medialis (P=.03) muscles was significantly lower in ACLR group. Healthy individuals showed higher score on both the functional test and IKDC questionnaire. (P<.0005)

Conclusion: Individuals who had undergone reconstructive surgery of ACL showed different muscular activity compared to healthy subjects and closer to ACL deficient individuals 6 months after surgery and routine rehabilitation.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Electromyography, Neuromuscular control



Page 1 from 1     

فصلنامه توانبخشی نوین Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 28 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657