Search published articles
Showing 23 results for Information System
Malihe Ghanaatjoo, Nader Jahanmehr, Dr. Hamed Dehnavi, Aida Samadi,
Volume 18, Issue 2 (5-2024)
Volume 18, Issue 2 (5-2024)
Abstract
Background and Aim: The increase in the amount of information and the need for their daily monitoring have led to the development of tools called management dashboards that have the ability to analyze graphical data. In addition to preparing quick reports in different time frames and user-specific format, the dashboard can be useful for providing dynamic updated information for accurate decision-making and quick response to changes.
Materials and Methods: The current research was carried out in the form of qualitative studies and participatory action research method in 9 steps. In this applied and developmental research that was conducted cross-sectionally using the data of the first half of 2022, 11 members of the leadership team of a super-specialized children’s hospital were selected as research participants. The data collection tool was an interview using a questionnaire to determine the importance of indicators and a usability questionnaire (usability) of the dashboard based on three independent variables (usefulness, ease of use and satisfaction). The Excel file of data needed for the dashboard was collected from the HIS system of the hospital, and the dashboard was designed with Power BI software, and the capabilities and access levels of users were determined based on their duties. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics and Excel software version 2016.
Results: In the stage of determining key performance indicators, out of 39 indicators selected by the research team, 22 indicators scored an average score of 4 or higher (from 5 points) and 21 indicators were able to be implemented. The data repository in Excel format was used as an intermediate environment. The dashboard was displayed on six pages (indicators related to the performance of inpatient beds, mortality, emergency and other indicators) and the capabilities of each page were determined. After implementing the dashboard and determining the access levels of users, obtaining a high score from the questions of the usability questionnaire (5 out of 7 points) and obtaining an average score of 71.8 out of 5 questions related to usefulness variables, 70.5 out of 8 questions related to ease of use. And 71 out of 3 questions related to the satisfaction variable showed that the dashboard designed for the hospital had high usability.
Conclusion: Hospital management dashboard information can be a basis for informed decision-making to achieve benefits such as identifying the best performance, improving performance quality, making faster decisions, reducing errors, improving capacity management and work flow, allocating resources and planning for growth and development.
Materials and Methods: The current research was carried out in the form of qualitative studies and participatory action research method in 9 steps. In this applied and developmental research that was conducted cross-sectionally using the data of the first half of 2022, 11 members of the leadership team of a super-specialized children’s hospital were selected as research participants. The data collection tool was an interview using a questionnaire to determine the importance of indicators and a usability questionnaire (usability) of the dashboard based on three independent variables (usefulness, ease of use and satisfaction). The Excel file of data needed for the dashboard was collected from the HIS system of the hospital, and the dashboard was designed with Power BI software, and the capabilities and access levels of users were determined based on their duties. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics and Excel software version 2016.
Results: In the stage of determining key performance indicators, out of 39 indicators selected by the research team, 22 indicators scored an average score of 4 or higher (from 5 points) and 21 indicators were able to be implemented. The data repository in Excel format was used as an intermediate environment. The dashboard was displayed on six pages (indicators related to the performance of inpatient beds, mortality, emergency and other indicators) and the capabilities of each page were determined. After implementing the dashboard and determining the access levels of users, obtaining a high score from the questions of the usability questionnaire (5 out of 7 points) and obtaining an average score of 71.8 out of 5 questions related to usefulness variables, 70.5 out of 8 questions related to ease of use. And 71 out of 3 questions related to the satisfaction variable showed that the dashboard designed for the hospital had high usability.
Conclusion: Hospital management dashboard information can be a basis for informed decision-making to achieve benefits such as identifying the best performance, improving performance quality, making faster decisions, reducing errors, improving capacity management and work flow, allocating resources and planning for growth and development.
Pezhman Sadeghi, Nader Jahanmehr, Reza Rabiei,
Volume 19, Issue 5 (12-2025)
Volume 19, Issue 5 (12-2025)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Information systems serve different purposes in organizational and management hierarchies. The hospital intelligent management system is an analytical and decision-support management information system that provides information and important performance indicators for managers in hospitals. Considering the role of this system in increasing the efficiency and effectiveness and the lack of academic hospitals having the desired level of productivity, this research was conducted to investigate the effective factors in improving the acceptance of the intelligent hospital management system in the hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU).
Materials and Methods: This descriptive and correlational research was conducted in 19 hospitals (12 teaching hospitals and 7 non-teaching hospitals) of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2022. In this study, 126 senior and middle managers and experts of the productivity committee participated. The data of this study were collected Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT) Questionnaire and for statistical analysis, SPSS software (statistical table and linear and multiple regression tests, sequencing, and chi-square) was used. The validity of the questionnaire was determined using the opinion of research experts and its reliability was also determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.824).
Results: Most of the participants in the study were from teaching hospitals (63.2%) and were middle managers (50.8%). Behavioral intentions were identified as the most important factors in the use of system by senior and middle managers and experts of productivity committee (P<0.001). The effort expectancy had the greatest impact on the intention to use the system as compared to the expected components of Performance expectancy and social influence. Also, training and having educational programs on how to use the HIM and its applications can increase the intention and use of the HIM by employees (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the results, the effect of the moderating variables in this study was insignificant. If senior managers and influential people encourage working with the system, and employees also make more effort to learn the system, and working with the system meets their expectations, employees will be willing to use the system. In other words, employees use the system when they believe that this system is user-friendly, valuable, and useful for them.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive and correlational research was conducted in 19 hospitals (12 teaching hospitals and 7 non-teaching hospitals) of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2022. In this study, 126 senior and middle managers and experts of the productivity committee participated. The data of this study were collected Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT) Questionnaire and for statistical analysis, SPSS software (statistical table and linear and multiple regression tests, sequencing, and chi-square) was used. The validity of the questionnaire was determined using the opinion of research experts and its reliability was also determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.824).
Results: Most of the participants in the study were from teaching hospitals (63.2%) and were middle managers (50.8%). Behavioral intentions were identified as the most important factors in the use of system by senior and middle managers and experts of productivity committee (P<0.001). The effort expectancy had the greatest impact on the intention to use the system as compared to the expected components of Performance expectancy and social influence. Also, training and having educational programs on how to use the HIM and its applications can increase the intention and use of the HIM by employees (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the results, the effect of the moderating variables in this study was insignificant. If senior managers and influential people encourage working with the system, and employees also make more effort to learn the system, and working with the system meets their expectations, employees will be willing to use the system. In other words, employees use the system when they believe that this system is user-friendly, valuable, and useful for them.
Ahmad Negahban, Azam Salehzadeh, Razieh Farrahi, Alireza Nourozi, Sina Tavakoli,
Volume 19, Issue 6 (3-2026)
Volume 19, Issue 6 (3-2026)
Abstract
Background and Aim: With the digitalization of healthcare, hospital information systems handle vast amounts of sensitive data, making their protection crucial. This study aimed to assess the compliance of these systems in hospitals affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences with the physical and technical safeguard standards of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 2024.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in 15 hospitals affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. The study population consisted of Information Technology (IT) unit managers, who were selected using a census method (15 individuals). The research instrument was a researcher-developed checklist consisting of 56 items based on the physical and technical standards of HIPAA. The face validity of the checklist was confirmed by five experts in Health Information Management, Medical Informatics, and Health Policy, and its reliability was verified with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.84. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
Results: A total of 15 information technology managers (14 men and 1 woman) from 15 hospitals, including 8 teaching and 7 non-teaching hospitals, participated in the study. The findings showed that the hospital information systems of Birjand University of Medical Sciences complied with the HIPAA physical and technical safeguard standards at rates of 81.7% and 86.7%, respectively. In the domain of physical safeguards, the workstation security standard demonstrated the highest level of compliance, with a mean score of 89.3%. Full compliance (100%) was observed for certain indicators, including emergency access procedures for facilities and physical access control procedures. In contrast, the lowest compliance in this domain was related to the device and media controls standard, with a mean score of 74.9%, particularly in the identification and tracking of hardware and electronic media. In the domain of technical safeguards, the overall mean compliance rate was 86.7%. Among these standards, person or entity authentication achieved the highest level of compliance, with all hospitals demonstrating full compliance (100%). In addition, access control (93.3%), audit controls (86.7%), and transmission security (85.3%) were all at desirable levels. However, the lowest compliance was observed for the integrity standard (50%), highlighting the need to strengthen technical infrastructure and implement more advanced electronic mechanisms to ensure data accuracy and integrity.
Conclusion: Although the overall level of compliance in the hospitals under study is satisfactory, significant gaps remain, particularly in device and media control and data integrity. These deficiencies may lead to breaches of patient privacy and undermine public trust in the healthcare system. It is recommended that senior hospital managers and health policymakers address these deficiencies by developing and implementing clear internal guidelines, investing in appropriate supportive technologies, and conducting continuous, targeted training programs for all personnel. In addition, periodic compliance monitoring is essential to ensure continuous improvement.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in 15 hospitals affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. The study population consisted of Information Technology (IT) unit managers, who were selected using a census method (15 individuals). The research instrument was a researcher-developed checklist consisting of 56 items based on the physical and technical standards of HIPAA. The face validity of the checklist was confirmed by five experts in Health Information Management, Medical Informatics, and Health Policy, and its reliability was verified with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.84. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
Results: A total of 15 information technology managers (14 men and 1 woman) from 15 hospitals, including 8 teaching and 7 non-teaching hospitals, participated in the study. The findings showed that the hospital information systems of Birjand University of Medical Sciences complied with the HIPAA physical and technical safeguard standards at rates of 81.7% and 86.7%, respectively. In the domain of physical safeguards, the workstation security standard demonstrated the highest level of compliance, with a mean score of 89.3%. Full compliance (100%) was observed for certain indicators, including emergency access procedures for facilities and physical access control procedures. In contrast, the lowest compliance in this domain was related to the device and media controls standard, with a mean score of 74.9%, particularly in the identification and tracking of hardware and electronic media. In the domain of technical safeguards, the overall mean compliance rate was 86.7%. Among these standards, person or entity authentication achieved the highest level of compliance, with all hospitals demonstrating full compliance (100%). In addition, access control (93.3%), audit controls (86.7%), and transmission security (85.3%) were all at desirable levels. However, the lowest compliance was observed for the integrity standard (50%), highlighting the need to strengthen technical infrastructure and implement more advanced electronic mechanisms to ensure data accuracy and integrity.
Conclusion: Although the overall level of compliance in the hospitals under study is satisfactory, significant gaps remain, particularly in device and media control and data integrity. These deficiencies may lead to breaches of patient privacy and undermine public trust in the healthcare system. It is recommended that senior hospital managers and health policymakers address these deficiencies by developing and implementing clear internal guidelines, investing in appropriate supportive technologies, and conducting continuous, targeted training programs for all personnel. In addition, periodic compliance monitoring is essential to ensure continuous improvement.
Related Websites
Site Keywords
Health Information Management, Health Care Management, Medical Laboratory Sciences, Medical Library & Information Sciences, Radiation Biology (Radiobiology and Radiation Protection), Operating Room, Anesthesiology
Site Statistics- Registered users: 3391 users
- Online users: 0 users
- Guest users: 95 users
- All visits: 7213574 visits
- Visits in 24 Hours: 7888 visits
- Total articles: 3256 articles
- Published articles: 841 articles
© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0
Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb