|
|
1389/10/10، جلد ۵، شماره ۴، صفحات -
|
|
|
| عنوان فارسی |
|
|
| چکیده فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| عنوان انگلیسی |
Comparison of Three Methods for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis |
|
| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Background: Leishmaniasis is one of the infectious parasitic diseases of highest incidence in the world. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) has long been reported in Shiraz, Southern Iran. There is a need to find a sensitive and specific method for treatment and control of the disease. Methods: We have compared the sensitivity of the conventional methods microscopy and cultivation of lesion scrapes against PCR amplification of parasite kinetoplast DNA from these samples. The samples (n=219) were obtained from the patients clinically suspected of CL. The smears were stained with Giemsa for microscopy and cultured in Novy-Nicolle-McNeal (NNN) blood agar for promastigote growth. For PCR, the dry smears were scraped off the slides and DNA was extracted. Results: The positive rates from 219 specimens were 76.71%, 50.68%, and 93.61% for microscopy, cultivation, and PCR, respectively. The highest correlation was found between PCR and microscopy method (P= 0.014). In PCR assay, 95.61%, 3.9%, and 0.49% of the samples were identified as Leishmania major, L. tropica, and dermatropic L. infantum, respectively. Conclusion: The PCR method appears to be the most sensitive for the diagnosis of CL and is valuable for identifying the other species of Leishmania with confusing dermatropic signs. |
|
| کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله |
PCR, Diagnosis, Cultivation, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis |
|
| نویسندگان مقاله |
53306---53307---53308---53309---53310---53311--- |
|
| نشانی اینترنتی |
http://ijpa.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijpa/article/viewArticle/221 |
| فایل مقاله |
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است |
| کد مقاله (doi) |
|
| زبان مقاله منتشر شده |
en |
| موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده |
|
| نوع مقاله منتشر شده |
Articles |
|
|
|
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه |
نسخه مرتبط |
نشریه مرتبط |
فهرست نشریات
|
