Volume 80, Issue 12 (March 2023)
Tehran Univ Med J 2023, 80(12): 965-973 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ashrafi K S, Saeedi N, Soltani P, Sadough Abbasian A, Rafiei M, Nejati F, et al . Evaluation and comparison of statistical models of hemodialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients in two groups (fistula and permanent catheter) in Arak dialysis center. Tehran Univ Med J 2023; 80 (12) :965-973
URL: http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-12274-en.html
URL: http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-12274-en.html
Kowsar Sadat Ashrafi * 
1, Nasser Saeedi1 , Parvin Soltani1 , Ali Sadough Abbasian1 , Mohammad Rafiei2 , Fereshteh Nejati2 , Mahdieh Gholamzadeh2 , Mojtaba Ahmadlou2
1, Nasser Saeedi1 , Parvin Soltani1 , Ali Sadough Abbasian1 , Mohammad Rafiei2 , Fereshteh Nejati2 , Mahdieh Gholamzadeh2 , Mojtaba Ahmadlou2
1- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
2- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
2- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Abstract: (941 Views)
Background: Adequacy of dialysis is a very important issue in dialysis patients, so comparing the adequacy of dialysis in different dialysis methods is very important. Therefore, due to the fact that the number of people undergoing dialysis through fistulas and catheters varies in different centers, and depending on different centers, there is a possibility of decreasing or increasing the adequacy of dialysis, so we decided to do this comparison in Arak support center.
Methods: In this analytical-cross-sectional study, the dialysis patients of Hami Arak Center from April 2019 to September 2019 were divided into two groups (the first group with permanent catheter, the second group with arteriovenous fistula) based on vascular access. The both groups were matched in terms of age, sex, weight, pump speed, filter size and also the duration of dialysis. All patients were dialyzed with the same type of dialysis machine, and the duration of hemodialysis for all samples was 4 hours in each session. To confirm the reliability of the device, it was calibrated before each use and the same setting was used for all samples. The blood samples were taken from the arterial route before dialysis and starting the dilution with heparin or normal saline. Statistical models of dialysis adequacy of patients in two groups were measured using the Kt/V criterion, SPSS and AMOS data analysis was performed.
Methods: In this analytical-cross-sectional study, the dialysis patients of Hami Arak Center from April 2019 to September 2019 were divided into two groups (the first group with permanent catheter, the second group with arteriovenous fistula) based on vascular access. The both groups were matched in terms of age, sex, weight, pump speed, filter size and also the duration of dialysis. All patients were dialyzed with the same type of dialysis machine, and the duration of hemodialysis for all samples was 4 hours in each session. To confirm the reliability of the device, it was calibrated before each use and the same setting was used for all samples. The blood samples were taken from the arterial route before dialysis and starting the dilution with heparin or normal saline. Statistical models of dialysis adequacy of patients in two groups were measured using the Kt/V criterion, SPSS and AMOS data analysis was performed.
|
Results: In the analysis of covariance of BUN before dialysis, there is a statistically significant difference in the studied groups (P<0.05), also in the UF and URR variables, dialysis time and the number of times of dialysis in three consecutive repetitions, there is a statistically significant difference in the studied groups. (dime fistula and catheter) are not present (P<0.05).
Conclusion: In this study, during repeated repetitions, 22% of the dialysis adequacy in the two groups did not have good adequacy, and 78% of the patients in the two groups had appropriate dialysis adequacy. |
Type of Study: Original Article |
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
