Motefaker M, Sadrbafghi S.m, Rafiee M, Bahadorzadeh L, Namayandeh S.m, Karimi M, Abdoli A.m,
Volume 65, Issue 4 (3 2007)
Abstract
Background: Following socioeconomic development, the amount of physical inactivity among a given population has typically increased. Physical inactivity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to measure the prevalence of physical inactivity among the urban adult population of Yazd, Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on an urban population of 1500 employed persons over the age of 20 years via cluster sampling. We use the IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) to evaluate physical activity levels. We evaluated the subjects according to their level of fitness, attitude toward physical activity and physical activity levels.
Results: According to the fitness information provided by the participants, 2.1% were weak, 10% were moderately fit, 39.9% were fit, and 48% very fit. Regarding the attitudes of the participants toward physical activity, 1% was unfavorable, 32.4% were partly favorable, and 67.7% were favorable. Concerning the intensity of physical activity, 67.3% persons were inactive, 15% were sufficiently active, and 17.7% were highly active. After adjustment for age, 65.8% were inactive, 13.8% were sufficiently active, and 19.8% were highly active. According to gender, 81.6% of men were inactive, as were 54.4% of women. Inactivity according to age was as follows: 57.8% of the 20-24 year old, 66.9% of those aged 30-44 years, 70.4% of the 45-59 year olds, and 68.4% of those over the age of 60. Furthermore, physical inactivity was more prevalent in the higher socioeco-nomic group.
Conclusion: The level of physical activity in urban population of Yazd is low. High risk is associated with employment, retirement, high socioecono-mic class and higher levels of education.
Alireza Sarmadi, Ahmad Kachoei, Mostafa Vahedian, Enayatollah Noori , Mojdeh Bahadorzadeh, Amrollah Salimi , Mohammad Hossein Assi,
Volume 79, Issue 9 (December 2021)
Abstract
Background: Cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgeries and its preferred method is laparoscopy. The difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in diabetic patients is not clear and the preferred method of cholecystectomy in these patients is still under controversy. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Methods: This retrospective analytical study was performed in Shahid Beheshti Hospital and Forghani Educational and Medical Center from April 2019 to April 2020. Samples were easily selected and 86 people in two groups of diabetic and non-diabetic patients were included in the study. All patient records were reviewed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for factors such as age, sex, diet, duration of surgery, bleeding, adhesions, and open surgery, and finally, diabetes as a risk factor. It was compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed in SPSS software version 22, an independent t-test was used to analyze quantitative data and the chi-square test was used to analyze qualitative data. In this study, a significance level of less than 0.05 was considered.
Results: Abdominal scar, palpable gallbladder and gallstone were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.33). But the history of cholecystectomy attacks was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Laboratory values were not significant (P>0.05) . Hard operations in diabetic patients were more than nondiabetic
patients and even two cases of open surgery were seen in the group of diabetic
patients, but there was no significant relationship (P=0.09). Intraoperative bleeding was
statistically significant between the two groups (P=0.02), But adhesion during the
operation was not related (P=0.38).
Conclusion: Finally, our study showed that diabetes can be a predictive risk factor for the difficulty of cholecystectomy.
Mojdeh Bahadorzadeh, Mostafa Vahedian, Mostafa Vahedian, Elaheh Khan Babaei , Pouya Derakhshan-Barjoei ,
Volume 81, Issue 6 (September 2023)
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal ulcers occur due to an imbalance between the defense mechanisms of the gastric mucosa and damaging forces, especially gastric acid and pepsin. Overall, complications occur in 10%-20% of these patients, and 2%-14% of wounds eventually perforate. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, smoking, Helicobacter pylori and high salt diet can be mentioned as important etiologies in this regard.
Methods: In this study, the information of patients with peptic ulcer who referred to Beheshti Hospital from 2019 to 2022 was analyzed. They were divided into two groups with perforation and without perforation. Then the variables of age, sex, smoking, NSAID and opium use, Helicobacter pylori infection and proton pump inhibitor use and previous history of peptic ulcer were investigated in two groups.
Results: The findings of the present study showed that the average age in the group with perforation was 48.7 and in the group without perforation was 42.04. In the non-perforated group, 58.5% of the patients were male, and in the group with perforation, 82.2% of the patients were male. In terms of smoking, 29.6% were smokers in the group without perforation and 50.4% were smokers in the group with perforation. Opium consumption was about 15.6% in people without perforation and about 33.3% in people with perforation. In terms of NSAID use, the prevalence was 35.6% in the group without perforation and 27.4% in the group with perforation. PPI consumption was 46.7% in the group without perforation and 21.5% in the group with perforation. In terms of the prevalence of H.pylori infection, the prevalence in the non-perforated group was 45.2% and in the perforated group it was 30.4%. The previous history of PUD was 56.3% in the non-perforated group and 37.8% in the group with perforation.
Conclusion: There was a significant difference between cigarette and opium consumption in the perforated and non-perforated groups, and PPI consumption in these two groups. In general, the prevalence of PUD was higher in males in both perforated and non-perforated types. Fuzzy results also confirmed the effect of risk factors concordance with perforation. |
