Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Bakhshandeh

Radmehr H, Shahzadi M, Bakhshandeh Ar, Torfi Y,
Volume 67, Issue 5 (6 2009)
Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Background: Surgical methods for treatment of tricuspid valve (TV) endocarditis include repair, replacement and partial or complete exicion. The aim of this study was to assess the results of these different techniques.
Methods: Sixty seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. This study was carried-out between April 1997 and July 2007 in Imam Khomeini hospital. Decision of methods of choice for surgery was according to intraoperative findings.
Results: The mean age was 25.52±7.35 years and 74.36% were male. The most common bacteria was Staphylococcus areus (62.30%). Most of patients (74.60%) were IV drug abuser. The most common treatment modality was TV reconstruction (56.72%) and after that was TV replacement (29.85%) and the last one was complete TV excision (13.43%). Eight patients (11.94%) needed emergent TV replacement. The morbidity rate was 28.36% and the mortality rate was 13.51%. Thirty seven patients were followed. In follow-up period it was shown that postoperative Ejection Fraction (EF) and End-Diastolic Right Ventricle Diameters (EDRVD) values did not differ from preoperative values, but Pulmonary Artery (PA) pressure and Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) severity were significantly lower compared with preoperative values. The postoperative function class did not show any changes compared with peroperative values.
Conclusion: Considering the specific epidemiology of patients with infective endocarditis, who are suffering from TV regurgitation, in some patients, it would be better to consider replacement instead of repair. This could be due to sever deformities and diffuse damage of TV leaflets from infection in our patients.


Amin Banaei, Bijan Hashemi, Mohsen Bakhshandeh, Bahram Mofid,
Volume 77, Issue 2 (May 2019)
Abstract

Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is one of the most usable methods in prostate radiotherapy that is used with different techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the dosimetric and radiobiological effects of prostate IMRT techniques regarding to joint volume between the target tissue and organs at risk as a patients anatomical parameter.
Methods: This research was a cross-sectional, analytical, and quantitative study that was carried out from April 2016 to June 2018 at the radiotherapy and oncology center of Shoheday-e-Tajrish Hospital and Medical Physics Department of Tarbiat Modarres University Tehran, Iran. Four various prostate IMRT techniques (9, 7 and 5 fields and automatic) were planned on 63 prostate cancer patients CT scans. Radiobiological effects were calculated using Relative Seriality model for the organs at risk (bladder and rectum) and target tissue. Results of mentioned prostate IMRT techniques were compared based on the patient’s anatomical parameter. 
Results: For the patients with joint volumes ranged from 0 to 15%, statistical differences were not observed among various IMRT techniques. The tumor control probability and complication free tumor control probability values decreased as a function of joint volume. The normal tissue complication probability value increased as a function of joint volume. The 9 and 7 fields IMRT techniques had not any significant differences (P=0.06) in all of the joint volume ranges. In patients with the joint volumes higher than 30%, the 9 and 7 fields techniques showed significantly better radiobiological values in comparison with 5 fields and automatic techniques (P=0.009).
Conclusion: In the patients with lower percentage of joint volume, all the mentioned prostate IMRT techniques showed same radiobiological effects; however, in the patients with higher joint volume percentages (> 30%), the 9 and 7 fields techniques have better results. It is proposed to use the 7 fields technique instead of the 9 fields technique, especially in prostate cancer cases with high uncertainty in patients’ setup.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb