Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Bostani

Arash Bostani, Hadi Gharabaghian Azar, Mehdi Jafari, Mastane Babaei Gramkhani,
Volume 80, Issue 1 (April 2022)
Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS), as an inflammatory autoimmune disease and chronic degenerative central nervous system degeneration, often occurs in early adulthood. One of the common and debilitating symptoms of this disease is fatigue, which can affect up to 80% of patients with MS. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic field therapy on fatigue in patients with MS.
Methods: Present study is a single-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) that Was conducted on patients with multiple sclerosis from March 2019 to September 2021. In this study, 46 patients who met our inclusion criteria were divided into two groups randomly: magnetotherapy intervention and control group. The intervention was performed in the form of a pulsed magnetic field with a frequency of 15 Hz and an intensity of 4.5 Millie Tesla. In order to blind patients, they were unaware of the intervention or control group, and the technician in charge of the treatment and the statistician knew about it. Data were then collected and recorded using the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale Questionnaire.
Results: Of the 46 patients studied, 22 (48%) were male and the rest of them were female [24 cases (52%)]. The mean age of men and women was 34.4±7.3 and 33.5±1.7 years, respectively. Among the intervention and control groups, 8 people took amantadine equally in each group. In the magneto-therapy intervention group, the mean severity of fatigue reduced from 4.91±0.86 to 4.27±1.10, which was significant (p=0.024). In our control group, the mean intensity of fatigue reduced from 4.83±0.83 to 4.37±0.81, which was significant statistically (p=0.028). Although, the difference between the response of the two groups to treatment was not significant (p=0.382).
Conclusion: Due to the lack of significant differences in the reduction of fatigue severity, this treatment is not recommended for the treatment and management of fatigue in patients with MS.

Reza Sahraei, Ahmad Bostani , Mousa Zare, Navid Kalani, Fatemeh Eftekharian,
Volume 82, Issue 3 (June 2024)
Abstract

Background: Cataract surgery is the most common surgery in the world. The prevalence of age-related cataract increases with age, and its prevalence increases with each decade of age after forty years. Various drugs are used to control analgesia and hemodynamics in patients undergoing cataract surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine and 2% lidocaine in the control of analgesia and hemodynamic changes in cataract surgery with local anesthesia.
Methods: In this double-blind clinical trial study, 52 patients with anesthesia class I and II underwent cataract surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: lidocaine (three cc) and dexmedomedin (five μg/kg + lidocaine). The information collection checklist in this study included: age, gender, history of aspirin use, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
Results:  The Mann-Whitney U test showed that the Dex-Metomedin group had less pain than the Lidocaine group in the first hour after the intervention (P=0.012). Two hours after the intervention, the dexmedemodin group had less pain than the lidocaine group (P=0.001). In the investigation of IOP after retrobulbar block in the dexmedetomidine group, we saw a significant increase in IOP from 16.56±3.12 to 17.96±2.68 mmHg compared to before the block (P=0.001). In the lidocaine group, we also saw a significant increase in IOP from 16.18±3.66 to 19.66±4.67 mm Hg compared to before the block (P=0.001). Before and after retrobulbar block, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.694 and P=0.108, respectively). To investigate the effect of these interventions more precisely, the amount of IOP pressure change was also compared between the two groups, and we saw a greater increase in the lidocaine group than in the dexmedetomidine group (P=0.002).
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that dexmedetomidine + lidocaine in retrobulbar form compared to lidocaine was able to control the pain level of patients after surgery and systolic and diastolic blood pressure during surgery. It is suggested to use this drug as local anesthesia in cataract surgery.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb