Tehran University Medical Journal

Background: Abnormal placental invasion in pregnancy is one of the most important dilemmas in gynecology and obstetrics medicine and because of the high potential risk of life-threatening massive bleeding, it has been considered as one of the most important causes of maternal morbidity and even mortality. According to the fact that previous cesarean section is the most highlighted and well-known risk factors for developing these types of abnormal placental invasion, and despite comprehensive recommendations for decreeing of this kind of surgery, the rate of caesarian delivery is raising worldwide, detecting the safer methods of management for optimizing the outcome is mandatory.
Case Presentation: In this report, we are discussing a patient in Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran, with twin pregnancy accompanying with placenta previa with abnormal invasion, which has got the best possible outcome after performing a multidisciplinary approach without any need to blood transfusion or general anesthesia during cesarean hysterectomy as the standard management of placenta increate. In this case, we have performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery. We found out that we can use the exact site of placental margin and the distance between placental margin and uterovesical junction. So we have done the uterine incision horizontally without damaging to the placenta. Generally, Doppler ultrasonography has enough accuracy for detecting all kinds of placenta creates.
Conclusion: By selecting a safe uterine incision, we can prevent such a sudden and massive bleeding during the operation and also avoid occurring end-organ damage due to hemorrhage for instance, acute tubular necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation resulted in maternal morbidity and mortality. In this report, we also discuss the points needed for management and treatment of abnormal placental invasion by reviewing the recent literatures.

Background: mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is a common practice before laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries but the role and efficacy of preparation have been questioned. this study assesses visualization and bowel handling in a group of patients who receive MBP and the control group and thereafter; compares the results.
Methods: We designed and conducted this randomized, single-blinded and controlled trial on patients who underwent advanced gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries. This clinical trial was carried out between July 2020 and January 2021. The patients were enrolled from l the laparoscopic office. 120 women aged 18-65 years undergoing level 2 and 3 benign gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries were randomized to bowel preparation with a normal saline enema (n=60) or non-bowel preparation (n=60) groups. Our patients underwent level 2 and 3 of benign laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries with or without MBP. The visualization and bowel handling were assessed by the primary surgical team and a questionnaire was later obtained. The outcomes included intraoperative surgical view and bowel handling, preoperative and post-operative patient signs and symptoms. The patients were also assessed in respect to discomfort prior and after the surgery, this assessment was obtained using a questionnaire. The gathered data was analyzed using IBM’s SPSS v26 software.

Background: Benign tumors of the gastrointestinal tract with a muscular origin are typically found in the esophagus, stomach, or small intestine, and rarely in the large intestine. Approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal leiomyomas occur in the large intestine, primarily in the descending colon and sigmoid colon. These lesions are usually asymptomatic and are often discovered during endoscopic procedures.
Case Presentation: A 38-year-old female patient admitted to the emergency department of Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnurd city in January 2024, reporting vague and nonspecific lower abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, low appetite and signs of partial gastrointestinal obstruction over the past week that don’t have any history of weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding, constipation or family history of cancer. Her symptoms had not responded to Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines and outpatient treatment. Given the nonspecific manifestations, a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with iv contrast was requested for further evaluation of inta abdominal disease. The CT findings indicated a 5.5 cm lesion at the beginning of the large intestine, which exerted pressure on the distal part of small intestine, leading to evidence of partial obstruction of the distal part of small intestin. The patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction due to an ascending colon tumor and was scheduled for surgical intervention. She underwent resection of right colon, 10-15 cm of terminal ileum along with drainage of the regional lymph nodes. The excised tissue sample was sent for histopathological examination, which suggested a benign colon tumor likely to be a leiomyoma. To facilitate a more accurate diagnosis, immunohistochemical analysis was recommended, which confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyoma.
Conclusion: Colonic leiomyomas can present with various symptoms depending on their size and location. Due to the difficulty in differentiating leiomyomas from malignant colonic tumors, particularly when they are larger, surgical intervention is often recommended. This case highlights the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management strategies for these tumors to prevent potential complications.