Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Gharebaghi
Efficacy of education with American Society of Health system Pharmacists guidelines on the prevention of stress ulcer
Naser Gharebaghi , Mohammadamin Valizade Hasanloei, Seied Hasan Adeli , Seied Arash Mansuri Zangir , Javad Rasuli ,
Volume 71, Issue 10 (January 2014)
Abstract
Background: Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP) is important in patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the American Society of Health System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines, for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Methods: In this Quasi experimental study, data of patients that admitted to the ICU of Imam Khomeini Hospital of Urmia was recorded for three months. Then our guideline that was selected on the basis of ASHP guidelines were presented to physicians for one month and then patients’ data were collected again. The patients that hospitalized due to acute gastrointestinal bleeding and died in the early hours of admission were excluded. The data were analyzed. Results: This study involved 234 patients, of them 112 patients (91.1%) in the pre- intervention period and 99 patients (89.2%) in the post-intervention period had received acid-suppressive therapy (AST) (P=0.632). Of 77 patients (62.8%) in the pre- intervention period and 88 (79.3%) in the post-intervention period had an indication for SUP according to our ASHP-based guideline (P=0.005). Of the patients without an indication for SUP, 39 of 123 (31.7%) received AST in the pre-intervention period versus 18 of 111 (16.2%) in the post-intervention period (P=0.006). of 112 (91.1%) cases in the pre-intervention period compared with 93 (83.8%) cases of the prescription drug order was incorrect (P=0.092). Gastrointestinal bleeding were in five patients (4.1%) found during the pre-intervention period and 8 (7.2%) cases in the post-intervention period (P=0.295). Conclusion: In this study the majority of cases not been in accordance with the ASHP-based guideline and our education did not affect the quality of stress ulcer prophylaxis. It seems that more attention to the training of physician in the prophylaxis of stress ulcer can be effective in improving the health status of patients and additional costs may be reduced.
A comparative study of the efficacy of coenzyme Q10 and propranolol in prophylaxis of migraine headaches: a double-blinded clinical trial
Hadi Gharebaghian, Azar Ghasemi , Elaheh Hoseinpour,
Volume 80, Issue 9 (December 2022)
Abstract

Background: Migraine is a recurrent disease which its definitive mechanism is still unknown. Thus mitochondrial dysfunction and neurovascular damage are two hypothetical underlying mechanisms for migraine headaches. The effectiveness of some possibly effective compounds such a CoQ10 has been studied. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in migraine headache prophylaxis.
Methods: This study was performed as a double-blinded randomized clinical trial on 112 patients with a diagnosis of migraine who were referred to the Neurology Clinic of Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah from March to September 2018. Then the patients were randomly divided into two equal groups (control and intervention). Both groups received propranolol 20 mg twice daily (totally 40 mg/d). The intervention group was treated by CoQ10 60 mg once daily, additionally. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of migraine headaches such as nausea and vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, severity, frequency and duration of attacks were evaluated by Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon tests.
Results: At the end, it was concluded that CoQ10 supplement of 60 mg daily with propranolol 40 mg daily in patients with migraine headaches improves symptoms more than receiving propranolol 40 mg alone. The results also showed that in the intervention group, nausea and vomiting, photophobia and the severity of headache in patients significantly improved compared to the control group (P values of 0.001, 0.114 and 0.001, respectively). However, the symptoms of phonophobia, frequency and duration of headache attack in the intervention group were not significantly different from the control group (P values were 0.062, 0.853 and 0.106, respectively).
Conclusion: In conclusion considering the main goal of this study, consumption of CoQ10 60 mg daily with propranolol 40 mg daily significantly improves symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, photophobia and severe headache compared to propranolol 40 mg daily. In conclusion, CoQ10 is a suitable choice in patients who do not respond adequately to the standard drug regimen.


Comparative study of the effect of neurotec vs gabapentin on sensory symptoms of patients with diabetic neuropathy
Hadi Gharebaghian, Mehri Amiri, Sepideh Seydi,
Volume 81, Issue 3 (June 2023)
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy throughout the world and has negative impact on patient's quality of life. There is no cure and to date several drugs have been used for its symptomatic treatment, including antidepressants and antiepileptics. Neurotec is a herbal medicine (combination of wild star anise, nettle and tansy) that can be potentially effective in the treatment of this disorder. Proposed mechanisms include its effects on increasing nerve conduction velocity and repairing peripheral nerves.
Methods: In a single-blind randomized clinical trial from April to September 2018 in Kermanshah of patients referred to Taleghani Hospital Clinic, 100 diabetic patients with sensory complaints, were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 100 to 300 mg gabapentin (a well-known effective antiepileptic drug) daily and the second group received 100 mg Neurotec daily. At the beginning of the study and at the weeks of 6 and 12, patients were evaluated with DN4 questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) for severity of sensory symptoms including paresthesia and numbness and the results were compared and analyzed. In each serial visit, possible drug side effects were asked from patients and recorded.
Results: Neurotec reduced the feeling of coldness, pain, paresthesia and numbness VAS and DN4 scores (P of 0.01,0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.001, 0.05 respectively). Neurotec showed a significant advantage over gabapentin in reducing pain intensity and in other parameters the difference between the two groups was not significant. The only significant complication of Neurotec was dyspepsia that could be minimal in patients who receive the drug after a meal. Conversely in the gabapentin group, dizziness, drowsiness, and vertigo were significantly more common (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Neurotec can be useful for sensory symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Its effect on symptomatic therapy is comparable to gabapentin or even better for painful diabetic neuropathies. Its proposed mechanism in neuronal repair needs to be evaluated and can be a potential advantage over symptomatic therapies. Neurotic has no serious side effects.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb