Ghanbari Z, Rostaminia Gh, Kajbafzadeh Ab, Pirzadeh L, Haghollahi F, Naghizadeh Mm, Pirooz E, Jabbari Z,
Volume 67, Issue 9 (6 2009)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Background: Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and related urinary symptoms
are frequent disorders in elderly women and their management improves life
expectancy and quality of life. Urodynamic tests applied in pathophysiologic
diagnosis and treatment of urinary disorders are not always cost effective.
This study aims to evaluate the results of Urodynamic tests in patients with
pelvic organ prolaps.
Methods: This case- control study was done using UDI-6 questionnaire during 18
months in vali-e-asr clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Iran with 105 cases of POP the cases were divided into
two groups: group one (66 cases with urinary incontinency) and group two (39 without incontinency) and
assessed with urodynamic tests.
Results: Based on UDI-6, the patients of group one had more clinical symptoms (frequency, urine
leakage, urge incontinence and stress incontinence). (p<0.001). Except for first desire to
voide and normal voided volume indices, there were no significant differences in
the other urodynamic parameters in two groups. Sensitivity and specificity of
urgency leak in group one was 22 and 68/8% and in group two was 30 and 65/5% respectively. Stress leak
sensitivity and specificity in group one were 25/4% and 100% and in group two were 57/1% and 71/9% respectively.
Conclusion: In this study, considering sensitivity and specificity
of symptoms and urodynamic test for urinary incontinency assessment is advised
in patients with POP who need surgery.
Farideh Hosseini, Mohammad Reza Sam , Nasrollah Jabbari ,
Volume 72, Issue 3 (June 2014)
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy has been used to treat many types of cancers over the past years. Radiotherapy generates side effects on normal tissues. Radiosensitizer products provide decrease in tumor proliferation and reduce radiation dose in radiotherapy. Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) as an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid has anti-proliferative effects on malignant cells. In this study, the effects of DHA accompanied by ionizing radiation on growth rate and survival fraction of HT29 colorectal cancer cells were evaluated.
Methods: The present study was performed at the Institute of Biotechnology, affiliated to Urmia University, Urmia, Iran in the year 2013. In this laboratory experiment, ma-lignant cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. HT-29 cells were cultured at 5105 cells/well into 6-well culture plates for overnight. Thereafter, the cells were pretreated with either 50 or 100 µM DHA for 4 hours and malignant cells were irradiated with either dose of 2 or 10 Gy. Cell viability was evalu-ated by trypan blue staining after 48 hours. Moreover, malignant cells were pretreated with either 50 or 100 µM DHA for 48 hours and irradiated with dose of 2 to 10 Gy. Thereafter, survival rate was evaluated by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay after 6 days.
Results: Cell viabilities were found to be 59.8% and 17.5% for 50 µM DHA in combi-nation with doses of 2 and 10 Gy respectively. Using 100 µM DHA diminished cell vi-ability up to 47% and 13.9% following doses of 2 and 10 Gy respectively. Treatment of cells with DHA accompanied by increasing doses of γ-rays significantly diminished survival rate. In treated cells with 50 and 100 µM DHA, survival rate were measured to be 79.1%, 57.6%, 42.8%, 40.5%, 34% and 55.8%, 43.7%, 33.6%, 27.9%, 23.5% for doses of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 Gy respectively.
Conclusion: Our study indicates that DHA decreases colorectal cancer cells prolifera-tion and could provide a new radiosensitizer drug to enhance the efficacy of colorectal cancer radiotherapy.
Ayoub Amirnia, Parinaz Mehnati , Nasrollah Jabbari ,
Volume 75, Issue 2 (May 2017)
Abstract
Background: Due to the presence of radiosensitive organs in the abdominopelvic region and increasing the number of requests for CT scan examinations, concerns about increasing radiation doses in patients has been greatly elevated. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the absorbed dose of radiosensitive organs and the effective dose in patients underwent abdominopelvic CT scan using ImPACT CT patient dosimetry Calculator (version 1.0.4, Imaging Performance Assessment on Computed Tomography, www.impactscan.org).
Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Imam Reza Hospital from November to February 2015 February 2015 in the Imam Reza Hospital, in Urmia, Iran. The demographic and dosimetric information of 100 patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT scan in a 6-slice CT scanner were obtained through the data collection forms. The demographic data of the patients included age, weight, gender, and BMI. The dosimetric parameters included pitch value, CT dose volume index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), tube voltage, tube current, exposure time, collimation size, scan length, and scan time. To determine the absorbed dose of radiosensitive organs and also the effective dose in patients, ImPACT CT patient dosimetry calculator was used.
|
Results: The results of this study demonstrated that the mean and standard deviation (SD) of patients' effective dose in abdominopelvic CT scan was 4.927±0.164 mSv. The bladder in both genders had the greatest mean organ dose, which was 64.71±17.15 mGy for men and 77.56±18.48 mGy for women (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The effective dose values of this examination are in the same range as previous studies, as well as International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. However, the radiation dose from CT scan has the largest contribution to the medical imaging. According to the ALARA principle, it is recommended that the scan parameters, especially mAs, should be chosen so that the patient dose is minimum, and the image quality is maximum. Furthermore, other imaging modalities are used as an alternative to the CT scan.
|
Fateme Azizi Mayvan , Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi , Ali Taghipour , Mohammad Taghi Shakeri , Mahsa Mokarram ,
Volume 76, Issue 7 (October 2018)
Abstract
Background: Regarding the increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes in pre-diabetic people, identifying pre-diabetes and determining of its risk factors seems so necessary. In this study, it is aimed to compare ordinary logistic regression and robust logistic regression models in modeling pre-diabetes risk factors.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study and conducted on 6460 people, over 30 years old, who have participated in the screening of diabetes plan in Mashhad city that it was done by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences from October to December 2010. According to the fasting blood sugar criteria, 5414 individuals were identified as healthy and 1046 individuals were identified as pre-diabetic. Age, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and waist-to-hip ratio were measured for every participant. The data was entered into the Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and then analysis of the data was done in R Project for Statistical Computing, Version R 3.1.2 (www.r-project.org). Ordinary logistic regression model was fitted on the data. The outliers were identified. Then Mallow, WBY and BY robust logistic regression models were fitted on the data. And then, the robust models were compared with each other and with ordinary logistic regression model according to goodness of fit and prediction ability using Pearson's chi-square and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve respectively.
Results: Among the variables that were included in the ordinary logistic regression model and three robust logistic models, age, body mass index and systolic blood pressure were statistically significant (P< 0.01) but waist-to-hip ratio was not statistically significant (P> 0.1). There were 552 outliers with misclassification error in the ordinary logistic regression model. Pearson's chi-square value and area under the ROC curve value in the Mallow model were almost the same as for ordinary logistic regression model. But it was relatively higher in BY and WBY models.
Conclusion: Based on results of this study age, overweight and hypertension are risk factors of prediabetes. Also, WBY and BY models were better than ordinary logistic regression model, according to goodness of fit criteria and prediction ability.
