Showing 2 results for Joneidi Jafari
Rezaee M, Ghasemi M, Joneidi Jafari N,
Volume 65, Issue 13 (Vol 65, Supplement 1 2008)
Abstract
Background: Dermal- respiratory reactions to latex glove is a common problem and
sometimes life threatening. Among health care workers, dental working personnel have
extensive use of latex gloves. A few numbers of researches have been done in Iran about
prevalence of these reactions but there is no comprehensive study for dental workers. The
purpose of this study was to evaluate reactions to latex gloves amongst dental workers in
military dental health centers.
Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive survey, dental workers with a minimum of
three months length of employment and most often use of latex gloves were asked to fill
standard questionnaire (derived from South Carolina Medical University) regarding latex
related clinical manifestation and personal medical history and predisposing factors Data
analysis was done by χ2 and Student's t test.
Results: In our study 330 personnel were assessed. The mean age and length of
employment was 31.6 and 8 years respectively. The most occupation was dentistry. A
total of 232 subjects (70.3%) reported latex gloves-allergic symptoms. 72 (21.8%) of
persons have history of atopy and food allergy was seen in 114 (34.5%). 63 (19.1%) of
subjects reported history of hand dermatitis. All of these predisposing factors had
positive regression with dermal and respiratory reactions.
Conclusion: In this survey the prevalence of allergic reactions was higher than similar
studies which may be due to type of gloves, lack of preemployment assessments and
other factors. Use of diagnostic methods such as serologic measures, SPT and pulmonary
function testing (such as spirogram) could be considered as tools for confirmatory and
differential diagnosis and important complementary for these studies. Because of
relationship between allergic reactions to latex gloves and some medical histories, it
seems to be necessary for preemployment evaluation and periodic health surveillance of
dental workers.
Ahmad Joneidi Jafari , Ebrahim Sahebdel , Asghar Hajipour , Mihan Jafari Javid , Seyed Mohammad Mireskandari , Kasra Karvandian , Afshin Jafarzadeh , Shahram Samadi ,
Volume 71, Issue 11 (February 2014)
Abstract
Background: Surgeons and anesthesiologists working in orthopedic operating theatres are exposed to significant noise pollution due to the use of powered instruments. This may carry a risk of noise-induced hearing loss. The present study was designed to quantify the noise pollution experienced by anesthesiologists at Imam Khomeini Hospital which is one of the largest Iranian hospitals.
Methods: Prior to beginning of any operation a sound level meter was worn by the anesthesiologist at the level of chest pocket. Basal sound level was recorded. All changes in the sound level of 25 operation rooms and two related pass ways were recorded and the mean sound level along with maximum sound level were noted. These data were analyzed by SPSS version 17. For comparing the mean values, the One way ANOVA and Post-Hoc analysis was used. Noise exposures were compared with occupational health guidelines.
Results: Our comparative data showed that orthopedic operation room had the highest level of noise, indicating that orthopedic operation room is significantly suffered by the most types of noise with the P value of 0.002. This is contrast to the sound levels at the other operation rooms which were at same range and were not significantly different. Comparison of the maximum sound level between these 27 places showed that orthopedic and one of general surgery room had top two maximum sound levels.
Conclusion: Overall total noise dose during all types of surgeries was measured as twice of permitted dose and also orthopedic and general operation rooms experience brief periods of noise exposure in excess.
