Showing 4 results for Kazemeini
Salarifar M, Kazemeini S.m, Haji Zeinali A.m,
Volume 65, Issue 1 (5 2008)
Abstract
Background: Premature coronary artery disease (CAD) has a familial predisposition and
occurrence. We determined the prevalence of CAD and related risk factors in individuals
with a history of premature CAD in their first-degree relatives.
Methods: This study included 700 healthy individuals with a history of premature CAD
in their parents or siblings in Tehran Heart Center in 2003-2004. History of smoking,
diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension was taken. Fasting levels of blood sugar (FBS),
triglycerides (TG), cholesterol, LDL and HDL were measured. Noninvasive studies for
CAD were performed with resting echocardiography (ECG) and ECG with exercise
tolerance test (ETT). Patients with positive findings for ischemia in these tests underwent
a myocardial perfusion scan and if positive proceeded to coronary angiography.
Results: The mean age of our subjects was 35.2 (15-65) years. DM was found in 5.3%,
smoking in 14.7%, hypertension in 20.6%, cholesterol above 200 mg/dl in 39.9%, TG
above 150 mg/dl in 58.6%, LDL above 130 mg/dl in 38% and HDL below 40 mg/dl in
32.6%. In addition, 6.4% had ECG changes and 3% echocardiographic abnormalities in
favor of ischemia. ETT was positive in 7.3% and myocardial perfusion scan in 2.1%.
Coronary angiography showed 50-70% stenosis in eight patients (1.1%) and >70% in
four patients (0.6%).
Conclusion: High cholesterol, TG and LDL and low HDL were found among our
subjects. Risk factor determination in these individuals may prove to be beneficial.
Noninvasive tests for CAD yield low true-positive results and are not recommended in
the population as a whole. In certain subgroups, including those with persons older than
40 years and diabetic patients, these tests may be useful.
Karimian F, Moghadamyeghaneh Zh, Aminian A, Pasha Meysami A, Fazely Ms, Kazemeini A,
Volume 67, Issue 4 (6 2009)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 !mso]>
ject classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui>
Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution can induce
complications when used as preoperative bowel preparation. The aim of this study
was to compare two methods for mechanical bowel preparation in elective
operations of colon.
Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 129 patients elected for
anastomosis of colon and referred to the surgical clinic of Imam Khomeini
Hospital of Tehran between March 2008
and March 2009 were included. They
were randomly allocated into two groups of PEG1
(1liter of PEG or 70gr
plus 15 mg bizacodil, n=63)
and PEG4 (4 liter
of PEG), according to the way of bowel preparation
and on the day before surgery, they received oral and IV
prophylactic antibiotics and cleared solutions. In the morning of the surgery,
they received their medication during 240
minutes. Then, they underwent anastomosic surgery of colon. The principle variables
recorded were nausea, vomiting, flatulence, Na and K
in the night before surgery, patients' and surgeons' satisfaction from bowel
preparation and postoperative infection and leakage.
Results: The majority of the patients were male (62%).
Nausea (28.57% vs. 98.48%,
p=0.001), flatulence (36.51%
vs. 95.45%, p=0.001),
and vomiting (4.76% vs. 75.76%,
p=0.001) were significantly lower in PEG1
and the patients' satisfaction were significantly higher (59.02%
vs. 1.52%, p=0.001)
Peroperative Na was significantly higher in PEG4
group (141.21±3.63 vs. 139.94±2.97mg/l,
p=0.001) and serum K
was significantly lower (3.55±0.25 vs. 3.76±0.21,
p=0.001). Surgeons' satisfaction were significantly
higher in PEG4 group (good to very
good 72.73% vs. 43.54%,
p=0.001). Postoperative infection of surgical site,
anastomosis leakage and ICU admission were
comparable between study groups.
Conclusions: Bowel
preparation with 1
liter of PEG plus
3
bizacodile pills instead of 1 liter of
PEG in
patients undergoing elective anastomosis of colon is not only associated with
lesser nausea, vomiting, flatulence, but also increases the patients'
satisfaction and tolerance, lessens electrolyte disturbances and do not
influence postoperative infection of surgical site and anastomosis leakage.
Sadegh Fazeli M, Safari S, Kazemeini A, Larti F, Joneidi E, Rahimi M, Meisami A,
Volume 69, Issue 8 (6 2011)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Background: Hemorrhoid
is among the most common anorectal diseases and patients with high-grade disease
conditions need surgical treatment. Many surgical procedures are available to
treat the disease. The aim of this study was to compare the operative time and
outcomes, (post-operative pain and complications) of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy
with those of the open conventional method.
Methods : This randomized single-blind clinical trial included 57 patients (28 in LigaSure and 29 in the open group). The
primary variable was the operative time for the excision of a single
hemorrhoidal packet. The other variables were post-operative pain measured by
morphine doses administered to control pain, scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) used to measure pain severity,
pain during home stay measured by doses of oral ibuprofen and the mean daily VAS scores, early complications
including bleeding and urinary retention, longer-term complications and time to
return to work.
Results : The demographic data were comparatively the same between the two
groups. The average time to excise a single packet of hemorrhoid was
significantly shorter in the LigaSure group (8.91
min vs. 17.35 min, P<0.001). Post-operative pain
measurements (morphine doses and VAS scores) were lower in the LigaSure group, but the differences were
not statistically significant (P=0.055 and 0.077, respectively). Complications of the two procedures were also comparable.
Neither of the groups returned to work in a shorter time.
Conclusion: LigaSure
hemorrhoidectomy seems to be a safe method and it can reduce the operative time
significantly. It may also have a modest effect on post-operative pain.
Amir Keshvari , Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli , Alireza Kazemeini , Alipasha Meysamie , Mohammad Kazem Nouri Taromlou,
Volume 71, Issue 10 (January 2014)
Abstract
Background: Colorectal carcinoma is considering as a curable disease. Treatment of recurrent cases is hard and sometimes impossible. Evaluation of the rate and affecting factors of recurrence in each hospital would help to decreasing recurrent cases. The aim of this study is evaluation of the rate, clinical and pathologic features, and outcome of recurrent colorectal carcinoma in a referral teaching hospital in Tehran.
Methods: Clinical data of 166 curative resections of colorectal carcinoma who were operated between Mehr 1384 and Mehr 1388 (between 23 September 2005 and 23 September 2009) in Imam Khomeini Hospital and were accessible for follow up was collected. Follow up data was collected prospectively up to Farvardin 1391 (19 April 2012). Forty nine recurrences were happened in this period. We compared recurrent and non-recurrent cases for different variables
Results: Average age of the patients was 53.5 years, and 47% of them were female. The median time to the diagnosis of recurrent disease was 12 months (range 1 months to 54 months). There were no significant differences between recurrent and non-recurrent patients about age, sex, sub-site of the tumor and sub-type of primary operation. Rate of overall recurrence, local recurrence and distant metastasis were 29.5%, 15.7% and 12.1% respectively.
Local recurrence rate was higher in colon cancer (16.44% vs. 15.05%) but distant metastasis rate was higher in rectal cancer (12.9% vs. 10/96%). Rate of curative re-resection was about 25%. Overall survival of the recurrent patients who underwent surgery was better than who underwent chemo or radiotherapy (66.7% vs. 56.8%). Median survival time of recurrent patients after primary surgery was 28 months, and after diagnosis was 12 months (9.28- 14.72,95% CI).
Conclusion: In this study the rate of overall recurrence was 29.5%. Local recurrence rate was higher in colon cancer (16.44% vs. 15.05%) but distant metastasis rate was higher in rectal cancer (12.9% vs. 10/96%).