Showing 2 results for Mireskandari
Darabi M.a, Mireskandari S.m, Sadeghi M,
Volume 65, Issue 6 (3 2007)
Abstract
Background: Invasive procedures such as bone marrow aspiration in children with oncologic malignancies are painful and may produce anxiety for both patients and their parents. Various pharmacologic treatments have been used to sedate children undergoing bone marrow aspiration. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the effectiveness of these combinations, as well as their associated hemodynamic and respiratory side-effects and recovery in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration.
Methods: Fifty children with oncologic malignancies whose ages ranged between 2-12 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned either to the Propofol- Alfentanyl group or the Midazolam- Ketamine group for analgesia and sedation during bone marrow aspiration in the operating room. Time to induce sedation, sedation score and recovery time were recorded.
Results: There were no statistical differences between groups in weight, age, sex and duration of procedures. Procedures were completed with satisfactory sedation levels in all patients in the study groups according to the modified Ramsay score. Induction and recovery times in the Propofol- Alfentanyl group were significantly shorter than in the Midazolam- Ketamine group (p<0.001). After Midazolam- Ketamine sedation, a statistically significant increase in systolic blood pressure and heart rate were seen, however the opposite was observed after Propofol- Alfentanyl sedation. Other side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, agitation myoclonus and aspiration, were not seen in our patients.
Conclusion: Both Propofol- Alfentanyl and Midazalam-Ketamine combinations can be used safely and effectively for sedation and analgesia during bone marrow aspiration in the pediatric patient group.
Ahmad Joneidi Jafari , Ebrahim Sahebdel , Asghar Hajipour , Mihan Jafari Javid , Seyed Mohammad Mireskandari , Kasra Karvandian , Afshin Jafarzadeh , Shahram Samadi ,
Volume 71, Issue 11 (February 2014)
Abstract
Background: Surgeons and anesthesiologists working in orthopedic operating theatres are exposed to significant noise pollution due to the use of powered instruments. This may carry a risk of noise-induced hearing loss. The present study was designed to quantify the noise pollution experienced by anesthesiologists at Imam Khomeini Hospital which is one of the largest Iranian hospitals.
Methods: Prior to beginning of any operation a sound level meter was worn by the anesthesiologist at the level of chest pocket. Basal sound level was recorded. All changes in the sound level of 25 operation rooms and two related pass ways were recorded and the mean sound level along with maximum sound level were noted. These data were analyzed by SPSS version 17. For comparing the mean values, the One way ANOVA and Post-Hoc analysis was used. Noise exposures were compared with occupational health guidelines.
Results: Our comparative data showed that orthopedic operation room had the highest level of noise, indicating that orthopedic operation room is significantly suffered by the most types of noise with the P value of 0.002. This is contrast to the sound levels at the other operation rooms which were at same range and were not significantly different. Comparison of the maximum sound level between these 27 places showed that orthopedic and one of general surgery room had top two maximum sound levels.
Conclusion: Overall total noise dose during all types of surgeries was measured as twice of permitted dose and also orthopedic and general operation rooms experience brief periods of noise exposure in excess.
