Tehran University Medical Journal

Background: One of the most empirical subjects particularly in substantial operations for example in surgeries involving the vertebral column, are the implication of sedatives in a manner which would create the least complications such as changes in the hemodynamic parameters. Two such drugs that are widely used in this capacity in clinical settings are midazolam and dexmedetomidine. Hemodynamic stability is particularly important in surgical operations, especially during spinal surgery. One of the ways to prevent hemodynamic changes during surgery is the use of drugs such as midazolam and dexmedetomidine.
Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial recruited 105 patients undergoing laminectomy spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan between 21 April 2019 till 1 September 2019. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: First was the midazolam group, second the dexmedetomidine group and the third was the control group. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation and percentages. In order for the evaluation of differences to be performed between all groups, an evaluation using the one-way analysis of variance was utilized. Statistical analysis was done by means of the SPSS software version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). The P-value which was accepted as significant was P less than 0.05. (P<0.05)

Background: A variety of sedatives like ketamine, propofol, opioids, and benzodiazepines are used during Fibroptic bronchoscopy. The effectiveness of ketamine-dexmedetomidine and ketamine-midazolam on pain level and sedation after Fibroptic bronchoscopy was examined.
Methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out from October 2020 to April 2021 at educational hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The participants were 60 candidates for fibroptic bronchoscopy who were allocated randomly into two groups of 30 people. Group one (Ketodex) received 1mg/kg ketamine and 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine for 10 min followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.5mg/min ketamine. Group two (Ketomed) received 2.5mg of midazolam and 1mg/kg of ketamine for 10min along with infusion of 1 µg/kg/min midazolam and 0.5mg/min of ketamine. The variables under the study were systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), percentage of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and level of pain. Furthermore, the sedation score of patients were recorded on the basis
of sedation score is a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS (v.26). To compare the data collected at different occasions and different groups, repeated measure tests and independent t-test were used (P<0.05).

Results: Compared to the Ketomed group, the sedation term in patients in the Ketodex group was longer significantly (P<0.001) with a significantly shorter recovery term (P<0.001). In addition, the differences between the groups were insignificant in terms of diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and percentage of arterial oxygen saturation (P>0.05). The pain levels were notably lower in patients who received Ketomed compared to Ketomed during 20 min (P=0.04) and 30 min (P=0.001) following the procedure. Conclusion: The use of Ketodex was associated with a longer sedation duration and significantly shorter stay in the recovery room and lower pain intensity compared to Ketomed, therefore it may be more preferable in bronchoscopy.

Background: In this study, the effect of intravenous dexamethasone on pain, nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic ovarian surgery was investigated.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2019 to March 2019 on patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in Beheshti Hospital, Isfahan. In this study, 88 patients aged 18 to 45 years were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups receiving dexamethasone (D) and normal saline (S). Two minutes before induction of anesthesia, the first group received 8 mg (2 ml) of dexamethasone and the second group received normal saline (2 ml). The duration of surgery and stay in recovery, the frequency of pain and nausea and vomiting, the need for analgesic and anti-nausea drugs, and the cardiovascular response during the study were evaluated and recorded.

Results:  No significant difference was seen in terms of demographic characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The frequency of pain during recovery (P=0.4) was not significantly different between the two groups, but at 2 hours (P=0.005), 12 hours (P<0.001) and 24 hours after the operation (P=0.005) (P=0) was significantly lower than S group. The frequency of nausea in group D during recovery (P=0.003), 2 hours later (P<0.001), and 12 hours (P=0.002) was significantly lower than group S, but 24 hours after the surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.15). During recovery, there was no vomiting in both groups (P=1), the frequency of vomiting in 2 hours (P=0.003), 12 hours (P<0.002) and 24 hours after the operation (P=0.48) in group D was lower than S. At the time of the study, the dose of diclofenac and metoclopramide received in group D patients was lower than group S. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular response between the two groups during the study (P>0.05). Conclusion: Dexamethasone with a dose of 8 mg before induction of anesthesia can be effective in reducing pain, nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic ovarian surgery and reducing the need for analgesics and anti-nausea drugs.

Background: Double lumen tube (DLT) is used in lung surgeries. Classically, the patient should undergo fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) to confirm the location of the DLT and its proper function. However, the sensitivity of ultrasound and clinical methods in diagnosing the correct position of DLT has not yet been definitively determined. This study was designed to assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and auscultation versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in determining the position of the Double-Lumen Tube.
Methods: This cross-sectional study of diagnostic value measurement type was conducted on patients who were candidates for double lumen implantation. After induction of anesthesia, DLT with the appropriate size was implanted, and then the position of DLT was evaluated. In the first step, the lungs were examined by auscultation, then the ultrasound was performed, and two signs of lung pulse sign and lung sliding sign were examined as signs of normal lung and ventilated lung. FOB was performed by an anesthesiologist. At the end, by opening the chest after surgery, the surgeon's opinion about the quality of lung collapse was recorded.

Results: In our study, the correct placement of the tube was correct in 37 cases and wrong in 3 cases, which were checked and corrected by FOB. Vital signs of the patients were stable before and during the operation. There were no problems with anesthesia during the surgery. Diagnostic sensitivity of lung auscultation clinical examination was 64.9% and chest ultrasound was 91.9%. The sensitivity of ultrasound compared to auscultation was not significant (P=0.242), but there was a clinically significant difference in the positive predictive value of the two, so that the positive predictive value of lung auscultation was 88.9% and lung ultrasound was 91.9%. In terms of surgeon satisfaction level, 22 cases (59.5%) had excellent satisfaction and 15 cases (40.5%) had moderate satisfaction. The sensitivity of ultrasound was not significant in comparison with the surgeon's satisfaction. Conclusion: Ultrasound can be a good substitute for FOB. Although ultrasound cannot have all the functions of FOB, but having advantages such as lower cost, speed of operation, and non-invasiveness, makes it more practical than FOB.

Both lidocaine and ketamine effectively reduce hemodynamic changes during endotracheal intubation, but lidocaine potentially has greater benefits in terms of improving oxygenation and reducing heart rate variability, as well as reducing recovery time during anesthesia. No significant difference was detected between the two studied groups regarding diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure changes, recovery stay, extubation time, and laryngoscopy grade. Conclusion: Based on the findings in this study, lidocaine offered more desirable hemodynamic stability than ketamine and resulted in fewer hemodynamic disturbances. Also, in the case of persistent hypertension or tachycardia. This was not observed in any of the groups.

Background: Tonsils are lymphoid tissues of the body's defense system that surround the pharynx and prevent the entry of microbes through inhalation. Tonsillectomy is the final treatment for enlarged tonsils and is one of the most common procedures in the ear, throat and nose. To prevent and improve postoperative complications, various methods are used, including lidocaine and dexmedetomidine injections. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous infusions of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on the rate and severity of immediate complications after tonsillectomy surgery.
Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial on 96 patients who were candidates for tonsillectomy under general anesthesia at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. The patients had informed consents and met the conditions to enter the study. 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, or placebo. All patients were examined for intraoperative bleeding, laryngospasm in the first 2 hours after the operation, and laryngitis in the first 24 hours after the operation. SPSS version 26 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: The findings of this research indicated that at 45, 75 and, 90 minutes after recovery, the mean score of pain and at 15-90 minutes in terms of anxiety was significantly different from the rest in at least one of the three groups (P<0.05). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and arterial oxygen blood pressure in minutes 30 to 90, as well as Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in minutes 60, 75 and 90, showed a significant difference between the three studied groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the incidences of laryngospasm in the groups. However, there was a significant difference between the incidences of bronchospasm in all three groups. In terms of factors such as cough and nausea, no significant differences were observed in the studied groups. However, the average amount of bleeding in surgery, the recovery time and, the first time to tolerate liquids and solids in at least one group were significantly different from the others. Conclusion: Overall, both dexmedetomidine and lidocaine are effective in reducing heart rate, SBP, Per Os (PO), and bleeding, and also increase arterial oxygen pressure, while respiratory rate, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cough, nausea and extubation time were not significantly different between the three study groups.

Background: More than one-third of women develop headaches in the first week after childbirth. Approximately 75% are benign primary headaches such as migraines or tension headaches. Others are secondary and include headaches of vascular origin or from hypertensive disease, infection, space-occupying lesions and dural puncture. Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is a common and annoying complication of spinal anesthesia, especially in cesarean section. This study compares the impress of an Atropine-Neostigmine mixture and Ondansetron on Post Spinal Puncture Headaches in Cesarean sec.
Methods: This triple-blinded controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 pregnant women candidates for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, that was carried out from May 2021 to August 2021 at Behshti Medical and Education Center affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University (IR.MUI.REC.1400.009) and informed consent was obtained from the patients/legal guardians. This clinical trial was registered at www.irct.ir with identification code IRCT 20160307026950N39.
 People were randomly assigned into three groups. A mixture of neostigmine (20 micrograms per kilogram) and atropine (10 micrograms per kilogram) in the first group and 4 mg of Ondansetron in the second group and a similar volume of normal saline in the control group were administered before surgery. Patients were followed up for headaches up to seven days after surgery. The severity of the headache was measured using the VAS scale. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and non-parametric equivalent, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square test, and repeated measure test were used to measure the relationship between the variables.

Results:  Analysis of the data did not show a significant difference between the three groups in terms of headache severity (P=0.788), headache duration, (P=0.723), the time elapsed from lumbar puncturing to the occurrence of the first headache (P=0.653), and the frequency of attempts for correct spinal tap (P=0.685). Conclusion: none of our considered interventions had a noticeable impress on preventing or reducing PDPH in Cesarean section.