Search published articles


Showing 7 results for Sayadinia
Investigating the level of anxiety in elective cataract surgery candidates
Pourya Adibi , Mehrdad Sayadinia, Parnia Dabiri , Majid Vatankhah, Mehrdad Malekshoar, Tayyebeh Zarei , Bibi Mona Razavi,
Volume 82, Issue 9 (December 2024)
Abstract
Background: Preoperative anxiety assessment allows for better analgesia in the postoperative period and a better experience for the patient. Previous studies have investigated anxiety factors specific to cataract surgery, reporting vision problems, particularly blindness, among the main preoperative fears. However, there is little research that fully and accurately investigates the causes and factors of anxiety in this population. Therefore, in this study, the factors related to anxiety in the elective eye patients.
Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, the comparison of the level of anxiety in elective eye patients of Shahid Mohammadi Bandar Abbas Hospital in the spring and summer of 2023 was investigated. Patients referred to Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital were included in the study according to the entry criteria and obtaining informed consent. In this study, after the approval of the research committee of the university, the necessary information was made by the researcher's checklist, which includes gender, age, causes of anxiety, patient's level of education, previous history of eye surgery, previous history of non-eye surgery and other underlying diseases. Was collected and the level of anxiety was measured in 2 stages before and after eye surgery based on VAS criteria.
Results: In this study, 85 (47.2%) patients were male and 95 (52.8%) were female. Also, most of the patients had a diploma-level education. Most patients mentioned a non-ocular surgery history (18.3%). Also, most of the patients (52.8%) noted an unknown cause as an anxiety-causing factor, and the least frequent among the anxiety-causing causes mentioned by the patients was the fear of death due to surgery. The level of anxiety in patients who had a history of non-ocular surgery was significantly lower. Patients who mentioned the unknown cause, the surgery itself, and financial problems as the cause of their anxiety experienced significantly higher preoperative anxiety and postoperative anxiety.
Conclusion: The level of anxiety in patients who have a history of eye and non-eye surgery is significantly lower. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative anxiety are significantly higher in patients who mention the unknown cause, the surgery itself, and financial problems as the cause of their anxiety.

Comparison of endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway methods based on dynamic compliance and airway resistance
Mehrdad Malekshoar, Bibi Mona Razavi, Mehrdad Sayadinia, Saeed Kashani, Nadia Mohammadi, Majid Vatankhah,
Volume 82, Issue 10 (January 2025)
Abstract
Background: This study was designed to compare the effects of using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation on airway resistance and compliance in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia. Evaluating these two methods is crucial for improving respiratory quality and reducing complications related to airway management in patients.
Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia at Hospital in Bandar Abbas between May and September 2024. The patients were equally divided into two groups: the first group received a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), while the second group underwent endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. The primary variables, including airway resistance and compliance, were measured at 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after anesthesia induction. Demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and ASA class were also recorded. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21, with descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test), considering a significance level of P<0.05.
Results: The findings of the present study showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age distribution and ASA class. A comparison of airway resistance and compliance between genders revealed no significant differences at 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes. There was no significant difference between the two anesthesia groups (laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube) in terms of age distribution. There was no statistically significant difference in ASA classification between the two anesthesia groups. At minute 0 of anesthesia, airway resistance was significantly higher in the endotracheal intubation group compared to the LMA group (P<0.001). At 30 and 60 minutes of anesthesia, airway resistance remained significantly higher in the endotracheal intubation group (P<0.001). Airway compliance was significantly higher in the LMA group at all measured time points (0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes) compared to the endotracheal intubation group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) compared to endotracheal intubation leads to improved airway compliance and reduced airway resistance during anesthesia. These findings may influence the selection of anesthesia methods and enhance postoperative care quality.

Investigating the frequency of anterograde amnesia after endoscopy with midazolam as a premedication
Mehrdad Sayadinia, Seyed Mohamad Seyed Mirzayi , Majid Vatankhah, Mehrdad Malekshoar, Tayyebeh Zarei, Bibi Mona Razavi,
Volume 82, Issue 11 (February 2025)
Abstract
Background: Endoscopy is a common medical procedure that often involves the administration of sedative agents to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, is commonly used as a premedication for its anxiolytic and amnestic properties. Despite its widespread use, there is limited research specifically assessing the occurrence of anterograde amnesia, a potential side effect associated with midazolam administration during endoscopic procedures. Understanding the frequency of this adverse effect is crucial for optimizing patient safety and procedural outcomes.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study After obtaining approval and ethical clearance, patients eligible for endoscopy at Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital were included in the study. They received 2mg midazolam intravenously before the procedure, followed by propofol for anesthesia maintenance. A memory test involving personal details was conducted before and after the procedure to assess progressive amnesia. Additionally, patients were asked about the procedure 5 minutes before discharge.
Results: 342 endoscopy candidates participated, with an average age of 46.77 years, over half being men. Less than a quarter had a diploma. Average endoscopy time was 2.96 minutes, mostly ASA class 2. Recall scores after midazolam injection and endoscopy were 5.22 and 2.87, respectively. Post-graduate education showed a significant difference in midazolam amnesia. No significant gender difference was observed. Longer endoscopy duration correlated with decreased recall scores. ASA class 2 patients had lower post-endoscopy recall scores than ASA class 1. Recall scores decreased with age, with the highest in the 19-29 age range, a statistically significant finding.
Conclusion: This study In conclusion, this study provided valuable insights into the factors influencing midazolam anterograde amnesia. Key findings include a significant association between higher education levels, particularly post-graduate education, and increased recall scores after midazolam injection. Gender did not show a significant impact on midazolam amnesia, but the duration of endoscopy played a crucial role. Additionally, patients in ASA class 2 exhibited lower recall scores than those in class 1, highlighting the influence of overall health status. Age also emerged as a factor, with the youngest age group showing the highest recall scores after endoscopy. These findings contribute to our understanding of factors affecting midazolam-induced amnesia during endoscopy procedures.

Non-pharmacological methods of anxiety control in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a review article
Shahram Shafa, Mehrdad Sayadinia, Bibi Mona Razavi, Tayyebeh Zarei , Maryam Ziyaei , Mansour Deylami,
Volume 83, Issue 2 (May 2025)
Abstract
Background: Controlling patients' anxiety before surgery reduces the possibility of postoperative problems and increases the possibility of patient participation and cooperation in the postoperative care and treatment plan.
Methods: This study uses a review approach to investigate non-pharmacological methods of anxiety management in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The systematic search involves several key steps. Literature search: A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, Sciences Direct, Scopus, Magiran, Sid, and Google Scholar databases. The search was refined using keywords such as “aromatherapy,” “music therapy,” “massage,” “educational intervention,” “educational film,” and “sound of the Quran” and their English equivalents to identify relevant studies published in the past ten years. Inclusion criteria included studies on orthopedic surgery, Persian and English articles, and original articles. Exclusion criteria included studies outside the specified time frame or studies that deviated from the defined focus. In this review, we conclude by summarizing key aspects of the review process, emphasizing the rigorous approach applied in study selection, data extraction, and synthesis.
Results: The results of the present study showed that the non-pharmacological methods used to control or reduce anxiety in orthopedic surgery include methods; Music therapy, the sound of the Quran, relaxation techniques, back massage, educational intervention, educational video, awareness and training before surgery and aromatherapy (chamomile, lemon, rose, valerian, cardamom, cinnamon, calendula, lavender, lemon sour).
Conclusion: The results of numerous and reputable research findings clearly show that the use of non-pharmacological methods plays an effective role in reducing the level of anxiety of patients before, during and after orthopedic surgery. These methods, which are generally low-cost, low-complication, and applicable in various clinical settings, include techniques such as preoperative education, music therapy, breathing and relaxation techniques, mindfulness-based interventions, psychological support, and the creation of a calm and reassuring environment. Since anxiety is a known factor in weakening the immune system, increasing postoperative pain, prolonging the recovery period, and reducing overall patient satisfaction, its management is of great importance. Therefore, by integrating and utilizing such non-invasive methods into nursing care protocols and holistic patient care programs, the detrimental and undesirable effects of anxiety after orthopedic surgery can be significantly reduced and faster recovery, a better patient experience, and more favorable clinical outcomes can be achieved.
 
A comparative study of metoclopramide and ondansetron for prevention of aspiration pneumonia in mechanically ventilated ICU patients
Majid Vatankhah, Saeed Kashani, Mohsen Sarafikhah, Bibi Mona Razavi, Mehrdad Sayadinia, Mehrdad Malekshoar,
Volume 83, Issue 2 (May 2025)
Abstract
Background: Aspiration pneumonia is a significant and potentially preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill ICU patients. Prophylactic pharmacological interventions, particularly antiemetics like metoclopramide (a prokinetic agent) and ondansetron (a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist), are commonly employed to reduce gastric aspiration and subsequent pneumonia. Despite their widespread use, comparative efficacy data remains limited. This randomized controlled trial was specifically designed to rigorously compare the effectiveness of these two distinct antiemetic strategies in preventing aspiration pneumonia among high-risk, mechanically ventilated patients, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.
Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial involved 116 individuals admitted to the ICU at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abbas from March 2024 to March 2025. Subjects were randomly assigned to metoclopramide or ondansetron groups. Enrollment criteria consisted of patients between 17 and 70 years old in the ICU requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Monitoring continued for 72 hours, with evaluation utilizing the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), chest X-ray (CXR) results, and physical assessments. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 21 employing descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, percentage, frequency) and inferential tests with significance set at P<0.05.
Results: Chi-square analysis indicated no statistically significant gender difference between groups (P=0.947). Mean age was 30.6±10.5 years for metoclopramide recipients and 32.9±6.12 years for ondansetron recipients. Further analysis revealed no significant differences in age or BMI between cohorts. No significant difference emerged between metoclopramide and ondansetron groups regarding aspiration pneumonia occurrence, with similar incidence rates in both arms. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that statistically, no variables influenced aspiration pneumonia development.
Conclusion: The results of this randomized trial clearly demonstrate no statistically significant difference in efficacy between metoclopramide and ondansetron for preventing aspiration pneumonia in intubated ICU patients. Both agents showed comparable effectiveness in our study population, suggesting that either drug represents a clinically acceptable prophylactic option. This finding provides clinicians with valuable therapeutic flexibility based on individual patient characteristics, drug availability, and cost considerations. However, further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm these findings across diverse patient populations and settings.
 
Comparison of two methods prolene and ultralight prolene mesh in inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial study
Bibi Mona Razavi, Tayyebeh Zarei, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Ahmadi Rashti , Mehrdad Sayadinia,
Volume 83, Issue 3 (June 2025)
Abstract
Background: The use of mesh is considered one of the most effective methods and is considered the method of choice in hernia repair. However, the debate about the choice of mesh type still persists. Therefore, in the present study, the results of using ultra-light Prolene mesh with standard Prolene mesh in hernia repair surgery were compared.
Methods: The present study is a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial that was conducted at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital in Bandar Abbas. Demographic information including age, sex, height, and weight were recorded in a checklist. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Each group used Prolene mesh in the first group and ultra-light Prolene mesh in the second group for repair. Hernia repair was performed by the surgeon using the Lebakhstein method.
Results: 119 patients were included in the study. 70 patients (57.4%) had direct hernia and 52 patients (42.6%) had indirect hernia. The mean age of the Prolene group was 43.8±7.49 and the ultra-light Prolene group was 44.32±8.91 years (P=.713). The mean BMI in the Prolene group was 29.94±3.43 and in the ultra-light Parwan group was 29.66±3.76 (P=.673). Wound infection was not observed in either group. Chronic pain was 14.5 in the Prolene group and 10.3 in the ultra-light Prolene group (P=.490). Administrative retention was 6.3 in the Prolene group and 8.5 in the ultra-light Prolene group (P=.738). The recurrence rate 3 months after surgery was 0 in the Prolene group and 1 case (1.7%) in the ultra-light Prolene group (P=.487). The recurrence rate 12 months after surgery was 2 cases (3.2%) in the Prolene group and 3 cases (5.2%) in the ultralight Prolene group (P=. 672). The time to complete recovery was 6.94±1.63 days in the Prolene group and 6.68±1.64 days in the ultralight Prolene group (P=. 368). There was no significant difference in pain intensity at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery between the two study groups.
Conclusion:  Both Prolene and ultralight Prolene mesh have relatively similar efficacy in inguinal hernia repair. Although the advantages of ultralight Prolene mesh, such as pain intensity, chronic pain, and faster onset of motion, were slightly different in the ultralight Prolene group, the recurrence rate was slightly higher in the ultralight Prolene group.

Abdominal compartment syndrome following abdominoplasty: a case report
Navid Kalani , Arnoosh Ghodsian , Abdolali Sepidkar, Mehrdad Sayadinia, Reza Sahraei ,
Volume 83, Issue 4 (July 2025)
Abstract
Background: Although abdominoplasty is cosmetically effective in patients with obesity or a history of significant weight loss, it can lead to serious complications. This case report highlights the role of elevated intra-abdominal pressure and delayed diagnosis of Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in the development of multiorgan failure and patient mortality.
Case Presentation: A 49-year-old female patient with a history of appendectomy and hysterectomy in the past years was admitted to the hospital for cosmetic abdominoplasty. She had a history of hypothyroidism and was taking levothyroxine regularly. Occasional tobacco use was also mentioned in the patient's history. During the operation, in addition to abdominoplasty, liposuction and flank surgery were also performed. The patient was initially placed in the supine position and then in the prone position for the last two hours. During recovery, the patient complained of shortness of breath and developed tachycardia. Despite persistently elevated BUN and creatinine, and progressive acidosis, a surgical consultation was performed with suspicion of Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), but this diagnosis was rejected by the surgeon. Also, despite clinical suspicion of Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) by the anesthesia team, in the early stages, the surgeon responsible for the patient did not have sufficient clinical suspicion of this complication and accordingly, intra-abdominal pressure measurement via bladder catheter was not performed. Since monitoring intra-abdominal pressure via bladder catheter requires a specific technique and coordination between anesthesia, surgery, and critical care teams, and since the possibility of ACS had been ruled out by the surgeon at that time, this procedure was not performed. Ultimately, the patient was transferred to the dialysis unit, but during hemodialysis, he suffered respiratory arrest and, after tracheal intubation, subsequently suffered cardiac arrest. Unfortunately, despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts, the patient died.
Conclusion: Although rare, abdominal compartment syndrome should be considered a critical differential diagnosis in high-risk patients following prolonged surgeries such as abdominoplasty with extensive plication. Monitoring intra-abdominal pressure and early intervention upon symptom onset may prevent fatal outcomes.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb