Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Taheri F

Raji B, Taheri F, Osia Sh,
Volume 65, Issue 6 (3 2007)
Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia can be associated with hemodynamic changes and some other complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding fentanyl to lidocaine on the spinal anesthesia time and its complications for cesarean section.

Methods: Sixty pregnant women with gestational age of 37- 42 weeks and ASA physical status I and II undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in a randomized double blinded clinical trial. They were randomly allocated to receive spinal anesthesia with lidocaine-normal saline (LS: 75 mg lidocaine 5% with 0.3 ml normal saline) lidocaine-fentanyl (LF) group (75 mg lidocaine 5% with 50 μg fentanyl). The duration of initiation of sensory block to achieve T4 level, time to return of sensory level to T12, time to first analgesic request, ephedrine requirement, nausea and vomiting during and after the surgery, pruritus, respirator depression, headache and apgar score of the new born  at 1st and 5th minutes were assessed.

Results: There was no significant difference between time to achieve T4 level, ephedrine dose, post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus and headache in study groups. Time to return of sensory level to T12 was significantly longer in LF group (152.6±14.7 vs. 66.2±11.2 min, P=0.0009). Time to first analgesic request was also longer in LF group (164.2±20.8 vs. 68.1±11.3 min, P=0.0009). The incidence of nausea and vomiting during surgery was significantly more in LF group (20% vs. 0%, P=0.023). No case of respiratory depression was observed in groups.The 1st and 5th minute's apgar score were comparable between groups and were between 7 and 10.

Conclusions: Addition of fentanyl to intrathecal lidocaine in patients undergoing elective cesarean section results in increasing of the block duration and time to first analgesic request without significant maternal or neonatal side-effects, without effect on 1st and 5th minutes apgar score  with increasing the incidence of during surgery nausea and vomiting.


Ali Mazouri, Majid Aklamli, Mahdis Mohammadian Amiri , Pegah Taheri Fard , Danesh Aminpanah , Mahaan Memarian,
Volume 81, Issue 2 (May 2023)
Abstract

Background: Today, the health of mothers and babies is of particular importance in health systems. So far, various interventions have been implemented to improve the health of pregnant mothers. The present study aimed to compare the effect of Entonox gas and Sufentanil epidural anesthesia in labor pain on the umbilical cord blood gas analysis and neonatal Apgar score.
Methods: The present study is a clinical trial on 800 pregnant women It was done in April 2020 to January 2022 at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital. Mothers were divided into two groups: spinal anesthesia and the group receiving Entonox gas. To measure the effectiveness, Apgar scores were measured at 1 and 5 minutes along with BE, HCO3, and PCO2 parameters. Two independent sample t-tests and ANOVA were used in SPSS version 22 software to analyze the data.
Results: The results of the study showed that the average age of mothers participating in the study was 27 years, and the average Apgar score of 1 and 5 minutes in the group of mothers receiving Entonox gas and spinal anesthesia was 9.9 and 8.6, respectively. Also, the average Apgar score at minutes 1 and 5 in the group of mothers with spinal anesthesia was 9.8 and 8.2, respectively. The results of the analysis and comparison of the parameters obtained from the arterial gases of the umbilical cord of newborns were not significantly different between both groups of mothers. Also, no significant difference was found in Apgar scores between both groups of mothers.
Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the effectiveness of using Entonox gas with spinal analgesia in the painless delivery of mothers; Therefore, considering the cost of each intervention along with their effect may cause a difference in the two interventions. This means that although both of the interventions have the same clinical and diagnostic effects, the one which costs less, will be more preferable from the point of view of the health system.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb