Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Tavasoli

Karimiyazdi A, Sazgar Aa, Aghayan Hr, Sadrhoseini Sm, Arjmand B, Tavasoli A, Imamirazavi Sh,
Volume 66, Issue 9 (5 2008)
Abstract

Background: Several therapeutic modalities have been cited for patients with microtia. Recently there are several reports about using cadaveric homograft cartilage for some other purposes. The aim of this study was to assess the results of auricular reconstruct-tion in 10 patients (12 ears) with congenital atresia using homograft rib cartilage from the Iranian Tissue Bank.

Methods: We enrolled 10 patients with microtia who were referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital from September 2006 to July 2007 for auricular reconstruction. The reconstruction was performed using a pre-shaped homograft(s) of each patient's ear(s) made by the Iranian Tissue Bank from the 6th, 7th and 8th costal cartilage according to the method of Marquette. In six patients, the second stage of reconstructive surgery was performed three months after the first stage. The patients were followed regarding the ear appearance, the dimensions of cartilage and tissue reaction.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 11.08 (SD=5.57) years and the average duration of follow-up was 6.29 (SD=3.12) months. Eight cases had unilateral involvement (six right and two left), in addition to two cases of bilateral involvement. During the follow-up period, the appearance of the helix was satisfactory in 11 ears and the lobule in 10 ears. The height and width of the reconstructed auricles was an average of 1-2 millimeters different from the opposite ear. Erythema was the most common early complication. Late complications, including cartilage exposure and infection, were observed in one patient.

Conclusion: Auricular reconstruction using homograft costal cartilage in patients with microtia has promising results. The short term resorption can be ignored and significant early or late complications are infrequent.


Bagheri R, Maddah Gh, Tavasoli A, ,
Volume 69, Issue 7 (7 2011)
Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors are classified as tumors that originate from smooth muscles. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common types of the proposed tumors and can be seen in the GI tract from the esophagus to the anus, but they are mostly seen in the stomach. Mostly from the stomach and asymptomatic, the majority of patients would benefit from surgery as the best method of treatment.

Methods: In this retrospective study we evaluated the data of patients with the diagnosis of esophageal or gastric mesenchymal tumors admitted in Ghaem and Omid Hospitals affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Iran, from 1992 to 2010. We analyzed factors such as age, sex, presenting symptoms and signs, diagnostic methods, types of pathology, types of treatment, morbidity, mortality and 3-year survival rates.

Results: Twenty four patients (16 male, 8 female) with a mean age of 50 were included in the study. The common site of tumor was gastric fundus. The most common symptom at the time of diagnosis was epigastric fullness which was observed in almost 50% of the patients. The most common type of surgery in the patients was subtotal gastrectomy and no hospital mortality was recorded. Paralytic ileus was the commonest complication seen in five patients (20.5%). Adjuvant therapy had been performed in eight patients (33.1%). Following the patients three years postoperatively, there were only three deaths (12.45%).

Conclusion: Regarding to the low mortality and morbidity of the surgeries, surgical treatment, if tolerated, is recommended for all Esophagogastric mesenchymal tumors patients.


Saba Jalali , Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri , Maryam Taheri , Abbas Basiri , Sanaz Tavasoli ,
Volume 77, Issue 11 (February 2020)
Abstract

Background: Renal calculus with increasing prevalence and incidence in recent decades have the highest burden of urologic diseases. While preventive measures could significantly reduce the rate of recurrence, the amount of compliance with the preventive guidelines is unclear among urologists. This study was designated to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice in kidney stones prevention among urologists for the first time in Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the participants of the 20th Iranian Urological Association Congress. The questionnaires included questions regarding demographics, educational and occupational information, knowledge, attitude, and practice of urologists in the field of kidney stones prevention. The questionnaires were designed according to the latest guideline of the European Association of Urology and previous studies. Scores related to the knowledge and practice were calculated based on the number of questions with correct answers. The response rate was also calculated. The correlation of knowledge and practice with background variables, including age, work experience, and time since graduation were assessed.
Results: The total response rate was 18.08% (64 out of 354 distributed questionnaires). The mean age of the respondents was 47.25±10.20 and the mean work experience was 15.61±11.70 years. The mean knowledge and practice scores were 8.36±1.48 out of 11 and 4.44±1.45 out of 7 scores, respectively. A total of 96.2% and 73.4% of the urologists earned at least half of the knowledge and practice scores, respectively. There was no significant correlation between knowledge and practice scores (P=0.706). Work experience and time since graduation had a negative relationship with the knowledge scores (respectively, P=0.02 and P=0.026), and faculty membership had a positive correlation with the practice scores (P=0.022). Most respondents had an acceptable attitude regarding the effectiveness of stone prevention.
Conclusion: Although the study participants had good knowledge, attitude, and practice pattern regarding urinary stone prevention, their performance score was less than their level of awareness. However, we could not generalize the results to other urologists due to the low response rate of the study.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb